For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt.
Skip to main content

Know the topic better than anyone in your committee.

Brief yourself on the mandate in minutes, then read all forty position papers at once — scored against your rubric, with the gaps, blocs, and opening questions pulled out for the dais.

DISEC has handled lethal autonomous weapon systems since 2013 through the CCW Group of Governmental Experts. The core fault line: a binding treaty banning fully autonomous systems, pushed by 30+ states and the ICRC, against a code of conduct under existing IHL. 12

Three procedural facts a chair needs: the CCW works by consensus, which has been used to block treaty-drafting motions; UNGA Resolution 78/241 was the first Assembly-level text on LAWS, passing 152–4–11; and the next real moment is the 2026 review. 23

Bloc-level: the Non-Aligned Movement largely favours a ban or moratorium, the EU is split but converging on 'meaningful human control' as a legal standard, and the P5 are divided — expect your delegates to arrive with exactly these three scripts. 34

One sourced workflow, start to final draft.

Ask, read, and draft without leaving the record.

Start for Free

Forty position papers, read before Friday.

Upload your committee's submissions in one go. Every paper comes back scored on country accuracy, research depth, policy proposals, structure, voice, and strategy — with a line of feedback the delegate can actually act on, and your edits on top. Included with Pro.

Open the organizer tools

The committee read before the first gavel.

One synthesis across the whole room: the gaps everyone shares, the bloc lines the papers imply, the delegates who will need a nudge, and the opening questions that will actually move debate.

Open the organizer tools

Chair the topic, not just the room.

Pull the mandate, the voting record, and the live state of play from primary documents — so when a delegate cites a resolution from the floor, you already know what it says.

Explore Model Diplomat search

Built on the primary record — not the open web.

Model Diplomat reasons over the documents your committee will argue about — treaties, voting records, official statements, case law. Every answer points back to one you can open from the dais.

100,000+users globally
200+primary sources
193countries covered
Treaties & accordswith ratification records
UN voting recordsCouncil & Assembly
Declassified cablesdated & attributed
Case lawICJ & national courts
Official datasetstrade, conflict, development
Scholarshippeer-reviewed

From first gavel to Secretary-General.

Read more
PrachiPrachiMUN Chair

When I chair my next MUN, I'll be only using Model Diplomat!

AanyaAanyaSecretary-General, EpicCrisis MUN

I love it! The chair tools make running committees so much smoother.

EdwardEdwardCo-Director, UNA-NCA

Model Diplomat is an essential resource for modern MUN preparation. It helps students effectively research diplomatic positions while preserving the educational value of the experience.

Ryaan KhanRyaan KhanMUN Delegate

I was able to finish my position paper in 10 minutes.

Abhiroop SinghAbhiroop SinghMUN Delegate

Model Diplomat AI sharpens my MUN game — helping me craft burning POIs, expose contradictions, and argue with precision.

CarstonCarston4-time MUN BestDelegate

model diplomat is an innovative website that can help seasoned veterans and fresh beginners all the same with easy to use interface and in depth guides

What you’re wondering.

The questions we get asked first.

No — it drafts the feedback and you decide. Every paper comes back with a score per rubric criterion and a written justification, and every line is editable before you export. The gavel is still yours.
The standard position-paper dimensions chairs already use: country accuracy, research depth, policy proposals, structure and format, diplomatic voice, and strategic awareness — weighted, with a 0–100 roll-up. Debate rounds use a case rubric instead: motion responsiveness, argumentation, evidence, clash, structure, and persuasion.
Yes. Export the committee as a DOCX pack with one feedback sheet per delegate, or as a CSV score matrix you can drop into your awards spreadsheet.
It flags near-duplicate submissions within the same committee and marks claims that read as unsupported or generic, so you know where to look. It is a signal for the dais, not a verdict.
PDF, DOCX, and plain text. Upload a whole committee's worth at once, or share one submission link and let delegates upload their own — they need no account, just the link. Delegate name, assignment, and school are read off the paper where possible and stay editable.
Yes. Pick a committee and it drafts the guide chapter by chapter — topic introduction, historical context, past UN action, the current situation, bloc positions, and QARMAs — with the sources it used shown against each chapter. You edit any chapter, regenerate any chapter, and export to DOCX or Markdown.
Import your roster and the committee page gives you roll call, the speakers list with a speaking timer, and a motion log that keeps the vote arithmetic honest. Speeches and motions are tallied per delegate as you go.
No. It ranks candidates for each award and shows the evidence behind every suggestion — paper score, speeches, motions — and you decide every award. Nothing is recorded until you say so.
Yes. Invite a co-chair to a conference and they get the same chair tools on it — papers, guides, roster, and the dais. You can withdraw access at any time.
The organizer tools are included with Pro, which starts with a free trial and can be cancelled anytime. Research pages, country profiles, Discover, and Learn stay open to everyone.
Take your seat at the table

The best committees are chaired by someone who read everything.

Brief yourself on the topic, review the whole room's papers in one run, and walk to the dais with the questions that open real debate.