Research that holds up under footnote scrutiny.
Grounded in primary sources — UN documents, treaty text, government policy records, and geopolitical datasets. Built for the depth university coursework demands, not plausible-sounding text.

The AU shifted from early cooperation to open friction after the 2009 al-Bashir warrant, framing the Court as disproportionately focused on Africa.
In 2017 the AU adopted a non-binding 'withdrawal strategy,' though only Burundi actually left — most members stayed, revealing a split between rhetoric and state practice.
The deeper question for a paper: is this a critique of selectivity, a sovereignty claim, or elite self-protection — the scholarship divides sharply.
One sourced workflow, start to final draft.
Sources that work in footnotes.
Every answer is grounded in UN documents, treaty databases, government publications, and verified geopolitical sources — the kind that survive a TA's scrutiny.
Explore Research →Built on the primary record — not the open web.
Model Diplomat reasons over the primary record — treaties, UN documents, court rulings, official datasets — so your analysis rests on sources you can cite.
Sources you can actually cite.
What you’re wondering.
The strongest papers rest on sources you read closely.
Map the perspectives, find the primary record, and write analysis that holds up under footnote scrutiny.
No card required · built on the primary record