Feature · Crisis Directive Analyzer · Crisis committees · MUN
Stop writing directives your dais will laugh at.
Crisis committees move fast. Bad directives — wrong portfolio powers, implausible mechanics, war crimes for breakfast — destroy your credibility. The Model Diplomat Crisis Directive Analyzer gives you instant feedback before you submit.
Instant
Feedback in seconds
5-axis
Plausibility, powers, escalation, history, voice
Built-in
Standard directive structures
Sound familiar?
01
You don't know what your portfolio can actually do
First-time crisis delegates submit directives the dais can't process — actions outside portfolio powers, actions that would constitute clear acts of war absent declared war powers, actions that contradict the established historical setting.
02
Crisis arcs need internal logic
A directive that ignores your three previous moves reads as desperation. The strongest crisis directives compound — each move sets up the next. The Crisis Directive Analyzer tracks your arc across the session.
03
Chairs reward style as well as substance
Directives written in the right diplomatic register, with appropriate deniability mechanisms, conditional clauses, and intelligence-collection objectives — those are the ones that get awarded.
What you get.
Portfolio-powers check
Paste a directive. Get instant feedback on whether the proposed action falls within your assigned portfolio's authority — historically and procedurally.
Escalation-risk scoring
Every directive carries escalation risk. The Analyzer flags actions likely to trigger immediate retaliation, third-party intervention, or international legal consequence — so you can decide whether the risk is worth it.
Plausibility validation
Does this actually work given the committee's historical setting and the resources you've committed? The Analyzer surfaces logistical, technological, and political constraints.
Historical precedent matching
Model Diplomat looks up the real historical analogs to your directive — Operation Mongoose for covert action in Cuba, NSC-68 for early Cold War posture, etc. — and tells you what they actually achieved.
Voice and register
Crisis directives have a specific diplomatic-action register. The Analyzer flags directives that read too casual, too modern, or too direct for the committee's setting.
Suggested revisions
Not just critique — concrete suggestions. 'Reframe this as proxy action through X, add deniability mechanism Y, include intelligence-collection objective Z' — the Analyzer turns weak directives into strong ones.
Common questions.
Does using the Analyzer count as outside help?
Most conferences allow tools — same as using historical research books or notes. The Analyzer is a research and review tool, not a writer. You write the directive; it gives you feedback. Check your conference's rules.
What committee types does it support?
Strongest support is for historical crisis committees (Cuban Missile Crisis, Cold War, WWII, etc.). Works for ad-hoc crisis, JCC, and modern crisis. Less optimized for purely fictional / fantasy committees, though the diplomatic-register feedback still applies.
Can it analyze crisis notes (not just directives)?
Yes. Crisis notes (one-way communications to specific portfolios or NPCs) get specific feedback on plausibility and the likely response.
Pricing?
The Crisis Directive Analyzer is a Pro feature ($3/week or $10/month). Free tier includes core research and country profiles.
Submit better directives. Win more awards.
Open Model Diplomat. Paste your next directive. Get feedback before the dais does.
No credit card · Works on any device · Free tier always available
