Know your topic better than your delegates.
Research your committee topic deeply, draft a background guide that actually prepares the room, and field any point of information — every answer pinned to a UN document a delegate can open.

The debate runs through the CCW Group of Governmental Experts. A bloc led by Austria, Brazil, and much of the Global South backs a legally binding instrument with a ban on fully autonomous systems. 12
Major military powers — the US, Russia, and others — resist binding rules, favouring non-binding principles and national review instead. 3
The fault line for your committee: meaningful human control as a legal standard versus a voluntary norm — and whether the CCW or the General Assembly is the right venue. 45
One sourced workflow, start to final draft.
A background guide delegates can't outprep.
Research history, current state, country positions, and proposed frameworks — every claim cited to a treaty, vote, or report. Build the guide on a foundation a prepared delegate can't poke holes in.
Explore Research →Built on the primary record — not the open web.
Model Diplomat reasons over the documents committees argue about — treaties, voting records, official statements. Every answer points back to one a delegate can open.
Run a committee that runs itself.
What you’re wondering.
The best committees are run by chairs who read it closely.
Research the topic, build the guide, and walk in ready for any point of information — sourced, every line.
No card required · built on the primary record