The landscape on any issue, mapped in minutes.
Where every relevant actor stands — sourced to UN votes, treaty text, and official statements. Then the literature review, the memo, the comparative analysis. Every claim traced to a record you can open.

The split is structural. A majority bloc — led by Austria and most of the Non-Aligned Movement — pushes for a binding treaty with a ban on fully autonomous systems.
The major military powers resist. The United States, Russia, and India oppose a binding instrument, favouring non-binding principles and arguing existing international humanitarian law already applies.
The practical effect: CCW talks in Geneva stay deadlocked on consensus rules, so the action has shifted to the UN General Assembly, where a binding-track resolution passed over the objections of the holdout states.
One sourced workflow, start to final draft.
Every actor's position, sourced and side by side.
Map where 193 states stand on any multilateral issue — UN voting history, treaty obligations, bloc alignments — with the primary document behind each line. Hours of document hunting become one query.
Explore Research →Built on the primary record — not the open web.
Model Diplomat reasons over the documents analysts actually cite — treaties, voting records, official statements, case law, datasets, and peer-reviewed work. Every answer points back to one you can open.
Trusted by people who check their sources.
What you’re wondering.
Analysis is only as good as the record behind it.
Map the landscape, pull the primary sources, and draft from a foundation that holds up to review — sourced, every line.
No card required · built on the primary record