For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt.
Skip to main content
Model Diplomat LogoModel Diplomat

For policy analysts · think tanks · NGOs · geopolitical research

Faster research. Same rigor.

A curated political knowledge base — UN documents, country positions, treaty text, diplomatic context — answered in minutes instead of hours.

193

Country profiles and positions

Daily

Diplomatic briefings on evolving situations

90,000+

Researchers and students

Sound familiar?

01

Mapping country positions across 193 actors takes time

For any multilateral issue — sanctions, climate agreements, arms treaties — understanding where every relevant actor stands requires hours of document research. Model Diplomat makes it a conversation.

02

Finding the actual primary source is half the battle

Analysts know what they're looking for. Getting to the specific UN resolution, treaty clause, or government statement quickly is where AI can actually save time.

03

Context matters as much as facts

Understanding why a country holds a position — the historical precedent, the domestic political constraint, the alliance logic — requires more than a database query.

What you get.

Primary source research with citations

Model Diplomat surfaces UN documents, government policy statements, treaty text, and verified geopolitical sources. Every answer links to where the information comes from.

All 193 country positions

Structured country profiles with foreign policy priorities, UN voting history, bloc alignments, and key bilateral relationships. The foundation for any multilateral analysis.

UN resolution and treaty database

Find and understand past resolutions, international agreements, and institutional precedents relevant to any policy area you're researching.

Geopolitical context and strategic logic

Not just what countries do — but why. Alliance logic, historical precedents, domestic political constraints, and the power dynamics that explain state behavior.

Cross-country comparative analysis

Compare positions across multiple countries on any issue. Understand where consensus is possible and where fundamental divergence exists.

Fast drafting support for policy memos

Use Model Diplomat to map out the landscape on any issue before writing — country positions, precedents, key arguments on all sides — then write your own analysis.

Common questions.

How does this differ from a geopolitical database subscription?

Traditional geopolitical databases are structured for queries — you look up specific data points. Model Diplomat lets you ask questions in natural language, synthesize across multiple sources, and get contextual explanations, not just raw data.

How current is the information?

The knowledge base is updated regularly. For breaking developments (last few days), supplement with current news sources. Model Diplomat is strongest for established positions, historical context, and structural analysis.

What policy areas are covered?

Security and defense, climate and environment, trade and economics, humanitarian law, human rights, public health, cybersecurity and technology governance, and more.

Is there a team or enterprise plan?

Contact us at team@modeldiplomat.com to discuss team access and pricing for organizations.

Faster geopolitical research.

Start with the free plan and explore the knowledge base. Enterprise and team plans available on request.

No credit card · Works on any device · Free tier always available

Live example for researchers

See it answer a real question.

Every Model Diplomat answer cites real primary sources. Nothing fabricated.

Recent IMF lending to Argentina — terms, history, and political fallout.

Argentina has had 22 IMF programs since joining in 1956 — the highest of any member state. The most recent is the April 2025 Extended Fund Facility (EFF) worth $20 billion over four years, replacing the 2022 EFF that itself replaced the failed 2018 $57 billion Stand-By Arrangement (SBA, the largest IMF program in history at the time).1

Key terms of the 2025 EFF: (a) lifting of currency controls (cepo cambiario); (b) fiscal-balance targets — primary surplus of 1.6% of GDP in 2025; (c) reserve-accumulation targets at the BCRA; (d) net financial flow of approximately $12 billion in 2025. The Milei government's commitment to these terms is the program's central political dependency.2

Political fallout traces three vectors: (1) IMF's institutional reputation — the 2018 SBA's failure prompted a 2021 Ex-Post Evaluation that was unusually critical of the Fund's own diagnostics; (2) Argentine domestic politics — Peronist opposition has historically framed IMF programs as sovereignty-erosion; (3) regional contagion concerns are limited compared to past episodes because most South American economies are decoupled from Argentina's capital account.3

Sources

1

Argentina and the IMF — Press Releases and Country Reports

International Monetary Fund

2

Argentina 2018 Stand-By Arrangement — Ex-Post Evaluation

IMF Independent Evaluation Office (2021)

3

Banco Central de la República Argentina — Monetary Policy Reports

BCRA

Run this query — or your own — in Model Diplomat AI Search.

Try this query
I've tested out the site with a few historical UN questions, and am in awe of how it uses AI to speed research tasks.
Jeff

Jeff

Veteran of UNA and TCF