When does SICUREZZA take place?

SICUREZZA is scheduled to run from November 17 to November 19.

What is the primary focus of SICUREZZA?

SICUREZZA is an international exhibition dedicated to the security and fire industries, showcasing the latest advancements and solutions in these fields.

SICUREZZA 2027

Nov 17–19, 2027Rho, ItalyIn-person

Registration open

SICUREZZA is an international exhibition dedicated to the security and fire industries, held in Rho, Italy. This event serves as a platform for industry professionals to explore the latest advancements, technologies, and solutions in the field. It brings together manufacturers, distributors, installers, and end-users to foster collaboration and address contemporary security challenges.

Committees & topics

Security Council 1 (UNSC)
United Nations Security Council I: The Situation in Sudan
Security Council 2 (UNSC)
United Nations Security Council II: Cybersecurity and the Protection of Critical Infrastructure
Committee on Digital Affairs & Sovereignty
Digital Affairs and Sovereignty: Governing the Cross-Border Data Economy
Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)
Economic and Social Council: Sovereign Debt Restructuring in Developing Countries
UNESCO
UNESCO: Protection of Cultural Heritage in Armed Conflict
UN Environment Programme (UNEP)
UN Environment Programme: Operationalising the Global Plastics Treaty
World Health Organisation (WHO)
World Health Assembly: Implementing the Pandemic Agreement
Human Rights Council (HRC)
Human Rights Council: Human Rights in the Age of Generative AI

Why it matters

The security and fire safety sectors are undergoing rapid transformation, driven by technological innovations and evolving global threats. Events like SICUREZZA are crucial for maintaining awareness of these changes and for facilitating the adoption of effective countermeasures. The exhibition's focus on showcasing cutting-edge products and systems means that attendees can gain insights into the future trajectory of security solutions.

Furthermore, the gathering in Rho, ITA, provides a significant opportunity for networking and knowledge exchange. Professionals from various segments of the security industry can connect, share expertise, and discuss emerging trends. This collaborative environment is vital for developing integrated security strategies that are robust and adaptable to complex global scenarios. The event's setting in Europe underscores the regional importance of such discussions.

How to prepare

To maximize engagement at SICUREZZA, delegates should undertake thorough preparatory work. This includes identifying key exhibitors and technologies relevant to their specific interests within the security and fire industries. Understanding the landscape of innovations presented at the event will allow for more targeted and productive interactions.

Consider utilizing frameworks such as the lesson on "what-is-stakeholder-mapping" to identify potential partners, competitors, and collaborators among the attendees. This strategic approach can enhance networking efforts and facilitate the formation of valuable alliances. Additionally, reviewing the "dynamic-analysis" lesson can help in understanding the evolving nature of security threats and how new technologies showcased at the event might address them.

For those interested in international collaboration, understanding the diverse perspectives brought by participants from various countries is key. Applying insights from "engagement-strategies" can help in navigating these interactions effectively, ensuring that discussions are productive and culturally sensitive. The event offers a prime opportunity to observe and analyze the practical application of security principles in a global context.

Country perspectives

Where the most-relevant 1 countries stand on the core issues in play. Click through for the full country profile.

Italy

As the host nation, ITA plays a central role in facilitating this international security exhibition.

Role in topic

ITA provides the venue for SICUREZZA in Rho, serving as a hub for security and fire industry professionals to convene and exchange knowledge. Its strategic location in Europe makes it an accessible meeting point for regional and international stakeholders.

Topics & background

The background behind each topic and the actors that shape it.

Security Council 1 (UNSC)

United Nations Security Council I: The Situation in Sudan

Sudan has been engulfed in civil war since April 2023, when long-simmering tensions between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) under General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) under Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo ('Hemedti') erupted into open conflict in Khartoum. The fighting derailed a fragile civilian transition that had begun after the 2019 ouster of Omar al-Bashir and the subsequent 2021 military coup. Combat has since spread to Darfur, Kordofan, and Gezira, producing what the UN and IOM describe as the world's largest displacement crisis, with famine conditions confirmed in parts of Darfur and credible reports of ethnically targeted atrocities reminiscent of the early 2000s. The Council's existing tools — the Darfur sanctions regime and arms embargo under Resolution 1591 (2005), the ICC referral via Resolution 1593, and humanitarian access demands in Resolution 2724 (2024) — have proven difficult to enforce. External actors are widely reported to be supplying both belligerents in violation of the embargo, and ceasefire initiatives mediated in Jeddah, Geneva, and Manama have repeatedly collapsed. Debate now centers on tightening sanctions enforcement, expanding the embargo nationwide, securing unimpeded cross-border humanitarian corridors, and the prospects for a civilian-led political track.

Key players

Security Council 2 (UNSC)

United Nations Security Council II: Cybersecurity and the Protection of Critical Infrastructure

State and state-sponsored cyber operations against critical infrastructure — energy grids, hospitals, water utilities, financial systems, and undersea cables — have moved from isolated incidents to a structural feature of international security. Landmark cases including NotPetya (2017), the Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack (2021), repeated intrusions into Ukrainian power infrastructure, and incidents targeting hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic have demonstrated that cyberattacks can produce kinetic-scale humanitarian and economic harm without crossing traditional thresholds of armed conflict. The UN process has produced a normative baseline through successive Groups of Governmental Experts (2013, 2015, 2021) and the Open-Ended Working Group on ICTs, which endorsed eleven voluntary norms of responsible state behaviour, including a prohibition on knowingly damaging critical infrastructure. The OEWG's 2025 final report continues this work, but states remain divided over whether to negotiate a binding cyber treaty (favoured by Russia and China), to consolidate existing norms (the Western preference), and over how international humanitarian law applies in cyberspace. The Council must now consider attribution mechanisms, protection of humanitarian and medical entities, accountability for ransomware ecosystems, and the security of submarine cables and space-based assets.

Key players

Committee on Digital Affairs & Sovereignty

Digital Affairs and Sovereignty: Governing the Cross-Border Data Economy

The concept of 'digital sovereignty' has emerged as states grapple with a digital economy dominated by a small number of multinational platforms and cloud providers, the vast majority headquartered in the United States and China. The 2018 EU General Data Protection Regulation, China's 2021 Data Security and Personal Information Protection Laws, India's 2023 Digital Personal Data Protection Act, and the EU's Digital Services Act, Digital Markets Act, and AI Act have built a patchwork of overlapping — and sometimes conflicting — regimes governing data flows, content moderation, platform competition, and algorithmic accountability. Decisions such as Schrems II have repeatedly disrupted transatlantic data transfers. The UN response has crystallised in the 2024 Global Digital Compact, adopted as part of the Pact for the Future, which commits states to bridging digital divides, governing AI, protecting human rights online, and advancing data governance. Yet major questions remain unresolved: how to reconcile cross-border data flows with national security and privacy; how to tax and regulate platforms whose value is generated globally; whether 'sovereign AI' and data localisation requirements fragment the internet; and how to ensure developing states are rule-makers rather than rule-takers. The committee will weigh interoperability, human rights safeguards, and the geopolitical contest between competing regulatory models.

Key players

UNESCO: Protection of Cultural Heritage in Armed Conflict

Deliberate destruction and looting of cultural heritage have accompanied recent conflicts from Mali and Syria to Iraq, Yemen, Ukraine, and Gaza. The 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict and its 1999 Second Protocol, together with the 1970 Convention against illicit trafficking and the 1972 World Heritage Convention, form the legal core of UNESCO's mandate. Landmark cases — the Taliban's 2001 destruction of the Bamiyan Buddhas, ISIL's demolitions at Palmyra and Mosul, and the 2016 ICC conviction of Ahmad al-Mahdi for attacks on Timbuktu shrines — established that intentional destruction of heritage can constitute a war crime. UNESCO maintains the List of World Heritage in Danger, deploys emergency safeguarding missions, and works with INTERPOL and customs authorities against illicit trafficking. Yet enforcement remains uneven, satellite-documented damage continues to outpace response, and questions of restitution — including African and Asian objects held in European museums — have become increasingly politicised. Delegates will consider strengthening preventive inventories, financing for emergency safeguarding, the integration of heritage protection into peacekeeping mandates, and accelerated frameworks for restitution and the return of cultural property.

Key players

UN Environment Programme (UNEP)

UN Environment Programme: Operationalising the Global Plastics Treaty

Plastic pollution has become one of the most visible failures of the linear global economy. UNEP estimates annual plastic production at over 400 million tonnes, with leakage into rivers and oceans projected to roughly triple by 2040 absent intervention. Microplastics have been documented from Arctic ice to human blood and placental tissue, and the petrochemical pathway from fossil fuels to plastics complicates climate mitigation goals. In response, the UN Environment Assembly adopted Resolution 5/14 in 2022, mandating negotiation of a legally binding instrument to end plastic pollution. The Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) has held successive rounds in Punta del Este, Paris, Nairobi, Ottawa, and Busan, with sharp divisions between a 'High Ambition Coalition' seeking caps on virgin polymer production and full-lifecycle measures, and a group of major petrochemical producers favouring a downstream, waste-management focus. Negotiations missed the original 2024 deadline. The committee will address production caps, regulation of chemicals of concern, extended producer responsibility, financing and technology transfer for developing countries, and the relationship between the future treaty and existing instruments such as the Basel Convention.

Key players

World Health Organisation (WHO)

World Health Assembly: Implementing the Pandemic Agreement

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed deep inequities in global health security: vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics reached high-income countries far earlier than the rest of the world, while pathogen sharing, surveillance, and supply chains repeatedly broke down. In response, the World Health Assembly established an Intergovernmental Negotiating Body in 2021 to draft a new pandemic instrument alongside parallel revisions to the International Health Regulations, which were amended in 2024. After protracted negotiations, the WHO Pandemic Agreement was adopted in May 2025, becoming the first treaty negotiated under Article 19 of the WHO Constitution in over two decades. The Agreement now enters its critical implementation phase. The most contested issue is the Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing (PABS) system, which would require manufacturers receiving pathogens and genetic sequence data to share a defined share of resulting vaccines and therapeutics with WHO. Other open questions concern technology transfer on 'mutually agreed terms', surge manufacturing capacity in developing regions, One Health surveillance, and financing through a coordinating mechanism. The committee will negotiate the PABS annex, sustainable financing, regional manufacturing hubs, and alignment with the amended IHR.

Key players

Human Rights Council (HRC)

Human Rights Council: Human Rights in the Age of Generative AI

The rapid mainstreaming of generative artificial intelligence since 2022 has raised acute concerns under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and other core human rights instruments. The 2021 and 2024 reports of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights documented risks to privacy, freedom of expression, non-discrimination, due process, and the right to an effective remedy from AI systems used in content moderation, predictive policing, border management, welfare administration, and surveillance. Several Special Rapporteurs have warned that opaque algorithmic systems can entrench bias and create accountability gaps that fall hardest on women, minorities, and people in the Global South. The normative landscape is consolidating quickly but unevenly: UNESCO's 2021 Recommendation on the Ethics of AI, the Council of Europe's 2024 Framework Convention on AI and Human Rights, the EU AI Act, the 2024 General Assembly resolution on AI for sustainable development, and the Global Digital Compact each address parts of the problem. The Council must consider whether existing human rights law sufficiently constrains state and corporate use of AI, the scope of due diligence obligations on platforms and developers, moratoria on high-risk applications such as real-time biometric surveillance, and the case for a Special Rapporteur or thematic working group on AI and human rights.

Key players