Where is the Danish Security Fair 2027 taking place?

The Danish Security Fair 2027 is scheduled to be held in Fredericia, DNK.

What is the primary focus of the Danish Security Fair 2027?

The fair's primary focus is on showcasing the latest advancements and solutions within the security industry, providing a platform for professionals in Fredericia to explore new technologies and discuss emerging threats.

How long does the Danish Security Fair 2027 last?

The Danish Security Fair 2027 is a multi-day event.

Danish Security Fair 2027

Name: Danish Security Fair 2027
Start: 2027-08-25T00:00:00Z
End: 2027-08-26T00:00:00Z
Location: Fredericia

Aug 25–26, 2027Fredericia, DenmarkIn-person

Registration open

The Danish Security Fair 2027 is a significant event hosted in Fredericia, DNK, focusing on the latest innovations and solutions within the security sector. This gathering serves as a crucial platform for professionals to explore new technologies, discuss emerging threats, and foster collaborations aimed at enhancing security measures across various domains. It underscores DNK's commitment to advancing security infrastructure and knowledge.

Committees & topics

Security Council 1 (UNSC)
The Situation in Sudan
Security Council 2 (UNSC)
Cybersecurity and the Protection of Critical Infrastructure
Committee on Digital Affairs & Sovereignty
Digital Sovereignty, Cross-Border Data Flows and Platform Governance
Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)
Sovereign Debt Restructuring in Developing Countries
UNESCO
Protection of Cultural Heritage in Armed Conflict and the Ethics of AI in Education
UN Environment Programme (UNEP)
Operationalising the Global Plastics Treaty and Closing the Emissions Gap
World Health Organisation (WHO)
Implementation of the WHO Pandemic Agreement
Human Rights Council (HRC)
Human Rights in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence

Why it matters

This event is critical for understanding the evolving landscape of global security. As threats become more sophisticated, forums like the Danish Security Fair 2027 provide an essential space for knowledge exchange and the development of robust countermeasures. The fair's focus on practical solutions and technological advancements directly contributes to strengthening national and international security frameworks.

For policymakers and industry leaders, the fair offers insights into the future direction of security technology and policy. It highlights the importance of proactive strategies in addressing challenges ranging from cyber warfare to physical security breaches. By bringing together diverse stakeholders, the event facilitates a holistic approach to security, emphasizing that effective protection requires continuous innovation and collaboration. The discussions and exhibitions at the fair can influence investment decisions and policy reforms, shaping the security agenda for years to come.

How to prepare

To effectively engage with the Danish Security Fair 2027, participants should conduct thorough preparatory research on current security trends and the specific challenges faced by DNK and its regional partners. Understanding the geopolitical context, particularly concerning cyber threats and critical infrastructure protection, will be crucial. Attendees should also familiarize themselves with the key players in the European security market and DNK's strategic security priorities.

Delegates should prepare to articulate their organization's contributions to security innovation and be ready to engage in discussions about cross-border cooperation. Reviewing lessons such as "Engagement Strategies" and "Dynamic Analysis" can provide valuable frameworks for maximizing participation. Identifying potential partners and areas of mutual interest beforehand will enable more productive networking and collaboration opportunities at the fair. Consider a "Stakeholder Mapping Workshop" to identify key individuals and organizations to connect with.

Country perspectives

Where the most-relevant 4 countries stand on the core issues in play. Click through for the full country profile.

Denmark

Host and key innovator in security technology.

Role in topic

As the host nation, DNK plays a central role in organizing and shaping the agenda of the Danish Security Fair 2027. The country is a significant contributor to security innovation, particularly in areas like cybersecurity and critical infrastructure protection, and uses this platform to showcase its advancements and foster international collaboration.

United States

Major developer and exporter of security solutions.

Role in topic

The USA is a global leader in security technology and defense. Its participation in the fair would likely involve showcasing cutting-edge solutions in cybersecurity, surveillance, and defense systems, and seeking opportunities for partnerships and market expansion within Europe.

United Kingdom

Strong focus on intelligence and cyber defense.

Role in topic

The GBR has a robust intelligence and cyber defense sector. Its representatives would likely focus on sharing expertise in threat intelligence, digital forensics, and national security strategies, looking to collaborate on joint research and development initiatives.

Germany

Key player in industrial security and data protection.

Role in topic

DEU is a major industrial power with a strong emphasis on data protection and industrial security. Its presence at the fair would likely highlight solutions for protecting critical infrastructure, industrial control systems, and ensuring compliance with stringent data privacy regulations.

Topics & background

The background behind each topic and the actors that shape it.

Security Council 1 (UNSC)

The Situation in Sudan

Sudan has been engulfed in civil war since April 2023, when long-standing tensions between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) under General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) under Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo ('Hemedti') erupted into open conflict in Khartoum. The fighting was the violent culmination of a power struggle that followed the 2019 ouster of Omar al-Bashir and the 2021 military coup that derailed Sudan's democratic transition. Combat quickly spread to Darfur, Kordofan, and Gezira, with the RSF accused of ethnically targeted atrocities echoing the Darfur genocide of the 2000s. The war has produced the world's largest displacement crisis, with more than ten million people uprooted internally or across borders into Chad, South Sudan, Egypt, and Ethiopia, alongside acute famine conditions declared in parts of Darfur. The Security Council's existing tools — the Resolution 1591 sanctions regime and Darfur arms embargo — have proven difficult to enforce, with credible reporting of external arms flows to the RSF via the UAE and to the SAF via Egypt and Iran. Mediation tracks in Jeddah, Manama, and through IGAD and the African Union have repeatedly stalled. The Council is now wrestling with humanitarian access, the protection of civilians, the prospect of expanded ICC referrals, and whether to broaden the sanctions regime beyond Darfur to cover the whole of Sudan. Russian and Chinese skepticism of coercive measures, alongside divisions among elected members with regional stakes, continues to shape the diplomatic terrain.

Key players

Security Council 2 (UNSC)

Cybersecurity and the Protection of Critical Infrastructure

State and state-sponsored cyber operations against critical infrastructure — energy grids, financial systems, hospitals, water utilities, undersea cables, and satellite networks — have moved from peripheral concern to central security issue. Incidents such as NotPetya (2017), Colonial Pipeline (2021), the Viasat KA-SAT attack at the outset of Russia's invasion of Ukraine (2022), and a steady stream of ransomware and wiper campaigns have demonstrated that disruptive cyber effects can cascade across borders and sectors with limited warning and uncertain attribution. The UN normative framework rests on the 2015 GGE report, endorsed by the General Assembly, which set out eleven voluntary norms of responsible state behaviour and confirmed that international law, including the UN Charter, applies in cyberspace. Successor processes — the Open-Ended Working Group (OEWG) on ICT security running through 2025 and parallel GGE work — have broadened participation but not resolved core disputes over how international humanitarian law applies, what counts as a use of force, and whether a new binding treaty is needed. A future Programme of Action is under negotiation as a permanent UN mechanism. In the Security Council itself, cyber has surfaced through Arria-formula meetings and thematic debates rather than binding resolutions. Members differ sharply on whether the Council should treat major cyberattacks on critical infrastructure as threats to international peace and security warranting Chapter VII tools, or whether such questions belong solely in disarmament and technical fora.

Key players

Committee on Digital Affairs & Sovereignty

Digital Sovereignty, Cross-Border Data Flows and Platform Governance

The notion of 'digital sovereignty' — the assertion of state authority over data, infrastructure, and online services within national jurisdiction — has moved from a niche European concern to a defining axis of international digital policy. The EU has codified its approach through the GDPR (2018), Digital Services Act, Digital Markets Act, AI Act, and the Data and Data Governance Acts, while pursuing the Gaia-X cloud project. China's Cybersecurity Law (2017), Data Security Law (2021), and Personal Information Protection Law institutionalise a state-centric model with extensive data localisation. India, Brazil, Vietnam, Russia, and a growing number of states have adopted localisation or conditional transfer regimes of their own. These national frameworks coexist uneasily with a global digital economy built on cross-border data flows. The OECD, G7, and Japan's 'Data Free Flow with Trust' initiative seek interoperability, while the WTO e-commerce Joint Statement Initiative has struggled to conclude. The 2024 UN Global Digital Compact, adopted as part of the Pact for the Future, established a soft-law baseline on connectivity, data governance, AI, and digital public goods, but left implementation to subsequent processes including a planned international scientific panel on AI and a global dialogue on AI governance. At the same time, major platforms — Meta, Alphabet, ByteDance, X, Amazon, Microsoft — exercise quasi-regulatory power over speech, commerce, and information ecosystems, raising questions about platform liability, content moderation, algorithmic transparency, and the role of states from the Global South that host users but neither headquarters nor regulators of these companies.

Key players

Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)

Sovereign Debt Restructuring in Developing Countries

Developing-country debt distress has reached its highest level in a generation. UNCTAD estimates that more than half of low-income countries are in or at high risk of debt distress, with interest payments now exceeding combined spending on health or education in dozens of states. The pandemic, the post-2022 surge in global interest rates, currency depreciations, and commodity shocks compounded longer-term increases in borrowing from non-Paris Club creditors — notably China — and from private bondholders, which together account for the majority of external debt for many sovereigns. The G20's Debt Service Suspension Initiative (2020–2021) and the Common Framework for Debt Treatments Beyond the DSSI have produced only a small number of restructurings (Chad, Zambia, Ghana, Sri Lanka outside the framework), and have been criticised for delay, opacity, and unequal creditor participation. Zambia's restructuring took more than three years; comparability-of-treatment disputes between official and private creditors remain unresolved. African and Latin American debtors, supported by UNCTAD and a coalition led by states such as Kenya and Colombia, have pushed for a UN-anchored sovereign debt workout mechanism, building on GA Resolution 69/319 and the outcomes of the Fourth Financing for Development Conference (FfD4) in Sevilla in 2025. ECOSOC is the principal UN body where this debate intersects with the SDG financing gap, estimated by UN DESA at over USD 4 trillion per year. Core disputes concern where authority over restructuring should sit (IMF, G20, or UN), how to bring private creditors and Chinese policy banks into common rules, and how to embed climate and development considerations into debt sustainability analyses.

Key players

UNESCO

Protection of Cultural Heritage in Armed Conflict and the Ethics of AI in Education

UNESCO's mandate over culture, education, and science has been stress-tested by overlapping crises. Armed conflicts in Ukraine, Gaza, Syria, Yemen, Mali, and Sudan have damaged or destroyed hundreds of sites of cultural significance, many under the 1954 Hague Convention and its protocols, and several inscribed on the World Heritage List. UNESCO has documented damage to historic centres, religious sites, museums, and archives, and has activated emergency mechanisms including enhanced protection listings and satellite monitoring with UNOSAT. ICC jurisprudence in Al Mahdi (2016) established that intentional attacks on cultural heritage can constitute war crimes, reinforcing UNESCO's normative role. In parallel, UNESCO's 2021 Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence — adopted by all 193 member states — has become the principal global soft-law instrument on AI ethics, supplemented by the 2023 Guidance on Generative AI in Education and Research. As generative AI is integrated into curricula, assessment, and research, UNESCO is grappling with risks to academic integrity, linguistic diversity, teacher autonomy, and equity between connected and unconnected learners, alongside the 2.6 billion people still offline. The organisation also continues to manage geopolitical strain: the United States rejoined UNESCO in 2023 after a five-year absence, while disputes over the politicisation of heritage listings — particularly in Jerusalem, Hebron, and Crimea — remain live.

Key players

UN Environment Programme (UNEP)

Operationalising the Global Plastics Treaty and Closing the Emissions Gap

UNEP sits at the intersection of two of the most consequential environmental negotiations of the decade. Following UNEA Resolution 5/14 in 2022, member states negotiated an Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee process toward a legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment. After five INC rounds — concluding with INC-5 in Busan in late 2024 and a resumed session in 2025 — states remain divided over whether the treaty should cap primary plastic polymer production, regulate chemicals of concern, and create a dedicated financial mechanism, or focus narrowly on downstream waste management. In parallel, UNEP's annual Emissions Gap Report continues to show that current Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement put the world on track for roughly 2.5–2.9°C of warming by 2100, far above the 1.5°C goal reaffirmed at COP28's first Global Stocktake. The 2025 NDC submission cycle and the operationalisation of the Loss and Damage Fund, hosted at the World Bank under UNFCCC and Paris guidance, place new demands on developing-country capacity and on developed-country finance commitments, including the new collective quantified goal agreed at COP29 in Baku. UNEP is also the secretariat host for major MEAs including the Minamata Convention on Mercury, CITES, CMS, and the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions, giving it leverage in linking plastics, chemicals, and climate agendas.

Key players

World Health Organisation (WHO)

Implementation of the WHO Pandemic Agreement

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed systemic failures in pandemic preparedness, equity of access to medical countermeasures, and the architecture of the International Health Regulations (2005). In response, the World Health Assembly established an Intergovernmental Negotiating Body in 2021 to draft a new convention, agreement, or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. After three years of negotiation, the World Health Assembly adopted the WHO Pandemic Agreement in May 2025 alongside targeted amendments to the IHR, marking the first major treaty negotiated under Article 19 of the WHO Constitution since the FCTC. The Agreement enters its implementation phase with several core obligations still to be operationalised through an annex on Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing (PABS), under continued INB negotiation. Disputes persist over technology transfer terms (voluntary vs. mandatory), allocation of pandemic-related health products, One Health surveillance obligations, and sustainable financing for preparedness — particularly for low- and middle-income countries. The Pandemic Fund hosted at the World Bank remains under-capitalised relative to assessed needs. At the same time, WHO faces budgetary strain following the United States' 2025 notification of withdrawal, ongoing measles and mpox outbreaks, and the broader challenge of integrating non-communicable disease commitments from the 2025 UN High-Level Meeting on NCDs into national health systems.

Key players

Human Rights Council (HRC)

Human Rights in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence

The rapid diffusion of generative AI systems since 2022 has forced human rights bodies to confront a new generation of risks: large-scale disinformation and electoral interference, non-consensual intimate imagery, biased automated decision-making in welfare, migration and policing, surveillance enabled by facial recognition, and harms to labour rights and linguistic minorities. The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights has issued successive reports — including the 2021 and 2024 reports to the Council on the right to privacy in the digital age and on AI — calling for moratoria on the highest-risk applications and for human-rights due diligence by states and companies. The Council operates against a thickening regulatory backdrop: the EU AI Act (2024), the Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI (2024) — the first binding international AI treaty — UNESCO's 2021 Recommendation on the Ethics of AI, the 2024 UN Global Digital Compact, and the GA's 2024 resolution on safe, secure and trustworthy AI led by the United States, alongside a parallel China-led resolution on AI capacity-building. The B-Tech Project at OHCHR continues to operationalise the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights in the tech sector. The Council is now debating whether to establish a Special Rapporteur on the human rights implications of AI, how ICCPR Articles 17 and 19 apply to algorithmic content curation, and how to ensure that human rights — including non-discrimination, due process, and freedom of expression — are embedded in national AI laws and procurement, particularly in jurisdictions with limited technical capacity.

Key players

Resources

News, lessons, and country profiles to prep for Danish Security Fair 2027.

Recent reporting to ground your prep

US Job Openings at 6.7M

Trump's Economic Reset

Supreme Court's Voting Rights Impact on 2026

Mifepristone Ruling Sparks 2026 Political Tug

Lessons

Bite-sized lessons to build the basics

Hidden Stakeholders

Engagement Strategies

Dynamic Analysis

Stakeholder Mapping Workshop

Courses

Guided courses that go deeper on the topic

Advanced Negotiation

Multilateral Negotiation

Policy Brief Writing

Conflict Resolution

Denmark August 2027

By committee

Frequently asked questions

Danish Security Fair 2027

Aug 25–26, 2027Fredericia, DenmarkIn-person

Registration open

Committees & topics

Security Council 1 (UNSC)
The Situation in Sudan
Security Council 2 (UNSC)
Cybersecurity and the Protection of Critical Infrastructure
Committee on Digital Affairs & Sovereignty
Digital Sovereignty, Cross-Border Data Flows and Platform Governance
Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)
Sovereign Debt Restructuring in Developing Countries
UNESCO
Protection of Cultural Heritage in Armed Conflict and the Ethics of AI in Education
UN Environment Programme (UNEP)
Operationalising the Global Plastics Treaty and Closing the Emissions Gap
World Health Organisation (WHO)
Implementation of the WHO Pandemic Agreement
Human Rights Council (HRC)
Human Rights in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence

Why it matters

How to prepare

Country perspectives

Where the most-relevant 4 countries stand on the core issues in play. Click through for the full country profile.

Denmark

Host and key innovator in security technology.

Role in topic

United States

Major developer and exporter of security solutions.

Role in topic

United Kingdom

Strong focus on intelligence and cyber defense.

Role in topic

Germany

Key player in industrial security and data protection.

Role in topic

Topics & background

The background behind each topic and the actors that shape it.

Security Council 1 (UNSC)

The Situation in Sudan

Key players

Security Council 2 (UNSC)

Cybersecurity and the Protection of Critical Infrastructure

Key players

Committee on Digital Affairs & Sovereignty

Digital Sovereignty, Cross-Border Data Flows and Platform Governance

Key players

Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)

Sovereign Debt Restructuring in Developing Countries

Key players

UNESCO

Protection of Cultural Heritage in Armed Conflict and the Ethics of AI in Education

Key players

UN Environment Programme (UNEP)

Operationalising the Global Plastics Treaty and Closing the Emissions Gap

Key players

World Health Organisation (WHO)

Implementation of the WHO Pandemic Agreement

Key players

Human Rights Council (HRC)

Human Rights in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence

Key players

Resources

News, lessons, and country profiles to prep for Danish Security Fair 2027.

Recent reporting to ground your prep

US Job Openings at 6.7M

Trump's Economic Reset

Supreme Court's Voting Rights Impact on 2026

Mifepristone Ruling Sparks 2026 Political Tug

Lessons

Bite-sized lessons to build the basics

Hidden Stakeholders

Engagement Strategies

Dynamic Analysis

Stakeholder Mapping Workshop

Courses

Guided courses that go deeper on the topic

Advanced Negotiation

Multilateral Negotiation

Policy Brief Writing

Conflict Resolution

Denmark August 2027

By committee

Committees & topics

Why it matters

How to prepare

Country perspectives

Topics & background

Resources

Related conferences

Geopolitics & Business Security

V2 Security Copenhagen 2026

Copenhagen Democracy Summit 2026

VL Summit 2026

AARCON Summer Conference 2026: "Transitions: The Aftermath of War and Conflict"

International Conference on International Humanitarian Law and Armed Forces Regulations

Frequently asked questions

Committees & topics

Why it matters

How to prepare

Country perspectives

Topics & background

Resources

Related conferences

Geopolitics & Business Security

V2 Security Copenhagen 2026

Copenhagen Democracy Summit 2026

VL Summit 2026

AARCON Summer Conference 2026: "Transitions: The Aftermath of War and Conflict"

International Conference on International Humanitarian Law and Armed Forces Regulations

Frequently asked questions