Debate case
Aff/neg case with carded evidence. Every claim sourced to a real document. Built for debaters who need evidence that holds up under cross-examination, not vibes.
What you'll get
- Carded evidence with author, qualification, date, and source
- Arguments structured for your specific debate format
- The strongest counterarguments pre-empted, with responses
What you'll fill in
resolution
Affirmative / Pro · Negative / Con
Policy debate · Lincoln-Douglas · Public Forum …
The prompt
This is what lands in your composer — edit the [blanks] and send.
Build an affirmative Public Forum case for the resolution: "[resolution]". Include: (1) framework/value (for LD) or stock issues (for policy debate); (2) three contentions, each with a clear warrant; (3) carded evidence — for every card, give author name, qualification, date, source publication or document, and the quoted text; (4) anticipated rebuttals from the other side with prepared responses. Format like real debate flow.
Start from this template
Model Diplomat fills it in with answers grounded in primary sources — every claim cites a real document, never a fabricated one.
Related templates
Browse all →Rebuttal prep
Anticipate the other side's best arguments and line up your responses.
Cross-examination
Questions that set traps and corner your opponent — with the follow-ups.
Country brief
Foreign-policy position on a topic, with allies, voting record, and rationale.
Position paper
Conference-ready paper in your committee's standard format. Footnoted and exportable.