Where is the conference being held?

The conference is being held in Hanoi, VNM.

What is the duration of the conference?

The conference spans two days, commencing in early August.

What is the primary focus of the conference?

The conference primarily focuses on the intersection of globalization, human rights, and post-conflict policy.

International Conference on Globalization, Human Rights, and Post-Conflict Policy (ICGHRPCP-26)

Name: International Conference on Globalization, Human Rights, and Post-Conflict Policy (ICGHRPCP-26)
Start: 2026-12-09T00:00:00Z
End: 2026-12-10T00:00:00Z
Location: Abu Dhabi

Dec 9–10, 2026Abu Dhabi, United Arab EmiratesIn-person

Registration open

The International Conference on Globalization, Human Rights, and Post-Conflict Policy (ICGHRPCP-26) convenes in Hanoi, VNM, bringing together academics, researchers, and policymakers. This event focuses on the intricate relationships between global processes, the protection of human rights, and the formulation of effective policies in regions emerging from conflict. Participants will explore how globalization impacts human rights frameworks and post-conflict recovery efforts, aiming to foster interdisciplinary dialogue and propose actionable solutions.

Committees & topics

Topics
Public Policy in a Globalized Era · Globalization: Trajectories and Tensions · Human Rights in the Contemporary International Order · Post-Conflict Policy and Human Rights · Globalization's Role in Post-Conflict Recovery · Human Rights Violations in Post-Conflict Areas · Reconciliation Processes and Human Rights · Policy Frameworks for Post-Conflict Societies

Why it matters

This conference is particularly relevant in an era where global interconnectedness increasingly shapes local realities, especially in post-conflict settings. The discussions will delve into how economic, social, and political globalization can either exacerbate existing human rights challenges or provide new avenues for their protection and promotion. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for crafting sustainable peace and development strategies.

The event's focus on post-conflict policy is vital for countries navigating the complex transition from violence to stability. It offers a platform to analyze various approaches to peacebuilding, reconciliation, and institutional reform, drawing lessons from diverse international experiences. By examining the successes and failures of past interventions, participants can contribute to more informed and effective policy-making.

Furthermore, the conference's location in VNM provides a unique regional perspective on these global issues. VNM's own history offers a compelling backdrop for discussions on post-conflict recovery and integration into the global economy, making the insights shared here particularly pertinent to the broader Asian context and beyond.

How to prepare

To effectively engage with the themes of globalization, human rights, and post-conflict policy, delegates should prepare by conducting thorough research into specific case studies. Consider how globalization has influenced human rights conditions and post-conflict recovery in countries like COL, RWA, or TLS. Analyzing the economic, social, and political dimensions of these influences will be key to contributing meaningfully to the discussions.

Participants should also familiarize themselves with various theoretical frameworks related to human rights and post-conflict transitions. This includes understanding different approaches to transitional justice, security sector reform, and economic reconstruction in fragile states. Reviewing the "Dynamic Analysis" and "Engagement Strategies" lessons can provide valuable context for understanding complex geopolitical shifts and the role of various actors.

Finally, preparing to articulate specific policy recommendations, backed by evidence, will enhance the impact of your participation. Consider how international cooperation, regional initiatives, and local ownership can be leveraged to address human rights abuses and foster sustainable peace. The "Hidden Stakeholders" lesson can help in identifying often-overlooked actors whose involvement is crucial for successful post-conflict policy implementation.

Country perspectives

Where the most-relevant 15 countries stand on the core issues in play. Click through for the full country profile.

Vietnam

VNM, as the host nation, offers a unique perspective on post-conflict recovery and economic integration within a globalized world.

Role in topic

VNM's historical trajectory provides a compelling case study for examining the long-term impacts of conflict and the challenges of nation-building, economic development, and human rights in a rapidly globalizing environment. Its experience can inform discussions on resilience and adaptation.

United States

The USA often champions human rights globally and plays a significant role in international post-conflict interventions.

Role in topic

The USA's foreign policy frequently emphasizes human rights and democratic transitions, often leading to involvement in post-conflict reconstruction efforts. Its perspective will likely focus on international norms, humanitarian aid, and the role of multilateral institutions.

China

CHN's growing global influence and economic model present an alternative perspective on globalization and development in post-conflict regions.

Role in topic

CHN's approach to international development and its "Belt and Road Initiative" have significant implications for post-conflict countries, particularly in terms of infrastructure development and economic integration. Its perspective may highlight sovereignty and non-interference.

Germany

DEU, with its strong commitment to human rights and multilateralism, contributes significantly to peacebuilding and development aid.

Role in topic

DEU's post-World War II reconstruction and its current role as a major donor and advocate for human rights position it as a key voice in discussions on transitional justice, reconciliation, and the rule of law in post-conflict settings.

Brazil

BRA represents a major emerging economy with a unique perspective on South-South cooperation and human rights in the Global South.

Role in topic

BRA's experiences in addressing social inequalities and its diplomatic efforts in promoting peace and development in Latin America and Africa offer valuable insights into alternative models of engagement and human rights protection in post-conflict regions.

India

IND, as the world's largest democracy, offers insights into managing diversity and promoting human rights within a complex societal structure.

Role in topic

IND's internal challenges and successes in upholding democratic values and human rights amidst vast diversity can provide a rich context for discussions on governance, federalism, and the protection of minority rights in post-conflict states.

Japan

JPN's post-war reconstruction and its role as a major aid donor provide a perspective on economic recovery and peacebuilding.

Role in topic

JPN's experience in rebuilding after conflict and its significant contributions to international development assistance, particularly in Asia, offer valuable lessons on economic recovery, infrastructure development, and humanitarian support in post-conflict contexts.

Russia

RUS, as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, holds a significant geopolitical role in discussions on international security and post-conflict resolutions.

Role in topic

RUS's involvement in various international conflicts and its geopolitical interests shape its approach to post-conflict policy and human rights. Its perspective often emphasizes state sovereignty and security concerns.

France

FRA, with its colonial history and commitment to universal human rights, plays a role in international interventions and development.

Role in topic

FRA's historical engagement in various regions and its strong advocacy for universal human rights principles position it as an important voice in debates on international law, humanitarian intervention, and post-conflict reconstruction, particularly in Francophone countries.

South Africa

ZAF's experience with truth and reconciliation offers a unique model for addressing historical injustices in post-conflict societies.

Role in topic

ZAF's transition from apartheid to democracy, particularly its use of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, provides a powerful case study for discussions on transitional justice, national healing, and the challenges of building an inclusive society after prolonged conflict.

United Kingdom

The GBR, a permanent member of the UN Security Council, contributes to international peace and security efforts and human rights advocacy.

Role in topic

The GBR's historical global influence and its ongoing commitment to international law and human rights mean it plays a significant role in shaping post-conflict policies, particularly through its involvement in peacekeeping missions and development aid.

Canada

CAN is known for its commitment to multilateralism, peacekeeping, and human rights advocacy on the international stage.

Role in topic

CAN's long-standing tradition of peacekeeping and its emphasis on human security and gender equality in its foreign policy make it a relevant voice in discussions on post-conflict reconstruction, protection of vulnerable populations, and inclusive peace processes.

Chile

CHL's transition from authoritarian rule to democracy provides insights into human rights and institutional reform in post-conflict contexts.

Role in topic

CHL's experience with democratic transition and its efforts to address past human rights abuses offer valuable lessons for countries undergoing similar processes, particularly concerning memory, justice, and reconciliation.

Norway

NOR is a prominent mediator in peace processes and a significant donor for humanitarian aid and development.

Role in topic

NOR's active role in facilitating peace negotiations in various conflicts and its substantial contributions to international development and humanitarian assistance provide a perspective focused on conflict resolution, human security, and long-term peacebuilding.

Netherlands

The NLD is a strong advocate for international law, human rights, and justice, often hosting international tribunals.

Role in topic

The NLD's commitment to international justice and its role as a hub for international legal institutions make it a key contributor to discussions on accountability for human rights violations and the establishment of rule of law in post-conflict settings.

Topics & background

The background behind each topic and the actors that shape it.

Public Policy in a Globalized Era

Public policy as a discipline emerged from early twentieth-century efforts to professionalize government decision-making, drawing on the administrative reforms of the Progressive Era in the United States and the welfare-state expansions in interwar Europe. After 1945, the Bretton Woods institutions, the OECD, and the UN system internationalized policy norms, while the 1980s saw a shift toward market-oriented reforms associated with the Washington Consensus. The 2008 financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, and recurrent climate shocks have since forced a re-examination of state capacity, regulatory authority, and the balance between market and public provision. The contemporary core dispute concerns how states design policies that are simultaneously effective, equitable, and democratically legitimate in an interconnected economy. Debates run along several axes: the appropriate role of industrial policy and subsidies (highlighted by the US Inflation Reduction Act and the EU Green Deal Industrial Plan), the regulation of digital platforms and AI, and the capacity of low-income states to deliver public goods amid fiscal stress. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development remains the principal multilateral reference point, though implementation has slowed and policy fragmentation across blocs has deepened.

Key players

Globalization: Trajectories and Tensions

Modern globalization accelerated after 1945 with the GATT trading order, decolonization, and the spread of multinational production networks, and intensified after 1989 with the end of the Cold War, China's accession to the WTO in 2001, and the digital revolution. These shifts lifted hundreds of millions out of extreme poverty but also produced sharp distributional consequences within both advanced and developing economies, contributing to political backlash visible in Brexit, US-China trade tensions, and the rise of economic nationalism. The post-2018 period has been marked by what observers call 'slowbalisation' or 'fragmentation,' as supply chains are reorganized along geopolitical lines, industrial policy and export controls expand, and cross-border data flows face new restrictions. The core dispute is whether the rules-based multilateral trading system, built around the WTO, can be reformed to accommodate climate policy, digital trade, and national security concerns, or whether it will continue to erode into competing economic blocs. Debates over reform of the WTO Appellate Body, plurilateral digital trade agreements, and critical-minerals supply chains are central to this contestation.

Key players

Human Rights in the Contemporary International Order

The modern human rights regime was codified in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and elaborated through the 1966 International Covenants (ICCPR and ICESCR), regional instruments such as the European and Inter-American conventions, and thematic treaties on torture, racial discrimination, women's rights, and the rights of the child. The 1993 Vienna Declaration reaffirmed the universality, indivisibility, and interdependence of human rights, and the UN Human Rights Council was established in 2006 with the Universal Periodic Review as its principal monitoring tool. Today the regime faces simultaneous pressures: democratic backsliding in multiple regions, the use of digital surveillance and AI to restrict expression and assembly, mass displacement linked to conflict and climate, and contested claims of cultural relativism. Recent OHCHR work on business and human rights, the right to a healthy environment recognized in GA Resolution 76/300, and ongoing debates over a Special Rapporteur on AI and human rights illustrate the expanding substantive scope of the field. The core dispute remains how to enforce norms against sovereign states that reject external scrutiny, and how to fund and protect human rights defenders operating in increasingly hostile environments.

Key players

Post-Conflict Policy and Human Rights

The contemporary architecture for post-conflict policy crystallized in the 1990s after the wars in the former Yugoslavia, Rwanda, and Sierra Leone, which exposed the inadequacy of traditional peacekeeping for protecting civilians and rebuilding shattered societies. The 2000 Brahimi Report, the 2005 World Summit endorsement of the Responsibility to Protect, and the creation of the UN Peacebuilding Commission in 2005 institutionalized an integrated approach linking security, governance, development, and human rights. The ad hoc tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, and the establishment of the International Criminal Court in 2002, anchored the criminal accountability dimension. The core challenge is sequencing: post-conflict states must simultaneously demobilize armed groups, reform security and judicial institutions, deliver basic services, and confront past atrocities, often under severe fiscal and political constraints. Cases such as Colombia's 2016 peace accord, transitions in Tunisia and The Gambia, and ongoing instability in South Sudan, the Sahel, Syria, Yemen, and Sudan illustrate both the possibilities and the fragility of these processes. Recent debates focus on the role of women under UNSCR 1325, the protection of economic, social, and cultural rights during reconstruction, and the integration of climate and displacement concerns into peacebuilding mandates.

Key players

Globalization's Role in Post-Conflict Recovery

Since the end of the Cold War, post-conflict recovery has been deeply intertwined with global economic integration. The World Bank, IMF, and regional development banks have channeled reconstruction finance into countries from Bosnia and Herzegovina to Liberia, Iraq, and Ukraine, typically conditioning support on macroeconomic stabilization and market liberalization. Foreign direct investment, diaspora remittances, and access to preferential trade arrangements such as the EU's Everything But Arms or the US AGOA program have shaped recovery trajectories, while extractive industries and global commodity prices have often determined whether peace dividends materialize. The central debate is whether rapid integration into global markets accelerates recovery or entrenches new vulnerabilities. Critics, drawing on experiences in Iraq, Afghanistan, and parts of the Western Balkans, argue that liberalization without strong institutions invites corruption, illicit flows, and elite capture; proponents point to Rwanda, Vietnam, and post-war Korea as cases where openness enabled growth. Contemporary discussions emphasize the role of digital connectivity, climate finance, and supply-chain inclusion in reconstruction, as well as the implications of sanctions regimes and frozen assets — notably Russian sovereign assets — for funding recovery in Ukraine and elsewhere.

Key players

Human Rights Violations in Post-Conflict Areas

Even after formal hostilities end, post-conflict societies frequently experience persistent and sometimes severe human rights violations. These include extrajudicial killings by security forces, sexual and gender-based violence, arbitrary detention, attacks on returnees and minorities, land dispossession, and the suppression of journalists and civil society. UN commissions of inquiry and OHCHR fact-finding missions in contexts such as Sri Lanka after 2009, post-2003 Iraq, post-2011 Libya, and the Tigray region of Ethiopia have documented how wartime patterns of abuse mutate rather than disappear in transition periods. The central dispute concerns accountability versus stability. Governments and some international actors often prioritize short-term security and elite bargains, while victims' groups and human rights bodies demand prosecutions, vetting of security personnel, and reparations. The International Criminal Court, hybrid tribunals such as the Kosovo Specialist Chambers, and universal jurisdiction cases in European courts have expanded the toolkit, but enforcement remains uneven. Contemporary attention focuses on Ukraine, Gaza and the West Bank, Sudan, Myanmar, and the Sahel, where post-conflict or frozen-conflict dynamics generate continuing violations and complex evidentiary challenges.

Key players

Reconciliation Processes and Human Rights

Modern reconciliation processes trace their lineage to post-authoritarian transitions in Latin America and Southern Europe in the 1980s and especially to South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission (1995–2002), which combined truth-telling with conditional amnesty. More than forty truth commissions have since been established worldwide, including in Guatemala, Peru, Sierra Leone, Timor-Leste, Canada (on Indigenous residential schools), and Colombia. The UN has codified the field through the 2005 Basic Principles on Reparations and the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on Truth, Justice, Reparation and Guarantees of Non-Recurrence, established in 2011. The core dispute is how to balance the four 'pillars' of transitional justice — truth, justice, reparations, and guarantees of non-recurrence — when political settlements often require trade-offs among them. Critics argue that reconciliation discourse can be used to shield perpetrators or to impose premature closure on victims; defenders contend that without ritualized acknowledgment and institutional reform, societies remain trapped in cycles of grievance. Current debates focus on memorialization, the inclusion of socio-economic harms and corruption within transitional justice, the rights of Indigenous peoples, and the role of digital archives and testimony in preserving evidence.

Key players

Policy Frameworks for Post-Conflict Societies

The principal international framework for post-conflict policy was articulated in the 2005 World Summit Outcome and operationalized through the UN Peacebuilding Architecture — the Peacebuilding Commission, Peacebuilding Fund, and Peacebuilding Support Office. This was complemented by the 2011 New Deal for Engagement in Fragile States, developed through the g7+ group of fragile states and the OECD, which introduced the Peacebuilding and Statebuilding Goals. The 2015 'Sustaining Peace' twin resolutions (A/RES/70/262 and S/RES/2282) shifted emphasis from post-conflict response to prevention across the entire conflict cycle, and the SDG 16 agenda on peaceful, just, and inclusive societies provides a measurable target framework. The core dispute is over ownership and sequencing. Host governments and the g7+ argue that externally driven templates have often imposed inappropriate institutional models and undermined local legitimacy, while donors emphasize fiduciary safeguards, human rights conditionality, and anti-corruption measures. The 2020 review of the peacebuilding architecture and the Secretary-General's New Agenda for Peace (2023) called for more predictable financing, stronger links between climate and security, and meaningful inclusion of women and youth. Operational debates today focus on Haiti, the Sahel states following recent coups, post-war Ethiopia, Yemen, and prospective frameworks for Syria, Gaza, and Ukraine.

Key players

Resources

News, lessons, and country profiles to prep for International Conference on Globalization, Human Rights, and Post-Conflict Policy (ICGHRPCP-26).

Recent reporting to ground your prep

Trump's Legal Battles Impact 2026 Elections

Trump's Economic Reset

Supreme Court's Voting Rights Impact on 2026

GOP Conservative Factions Clash Over Trump

Lessons

Bite-sized lessons to build the basics

Hidden Stakeholders

Engagement Strategies

Dynamic Analysis

Stakeholder Mapping Workshop

Courses

Guided courses that go deeper on the topic

Policy Brief Writing

Conflict Resolution

Advanced Negotiation

Multilateral Negotiation

United Arab Emirates December 2026

By committee

Frequently asked questions

International Conference on Globalization, Human Rights, and Post-Conflict Policy (ICGHRPCP-26)

Dec 9–10, 2026Abu Dhabi, United Arab EmiratesIn-person

Registration open

Committees & topics

Topics
Public Policy in a Globalized Era · Globalization: Trajectories and Tensions · Human Rights in the Contemporary International Order · Post-Conflict Policy and Human Rights · Globalization's Role in Post-Conflict Recovery · Human Rights Violations in Post-Conflict Areas · Reconciliation Processes and Human Rights · Policy Frameworks for Post-Conflict Societies

Why it matters

How to prepare

Country perspectives

Where the most-relevant 15 countries stand on the core issues in play. Click through for the full country profile.

Vietnam

VNM, as the host nation, offers a unique perspective on post-conflict recovery and economic integration within a globalized world.

Role in topic

United States

The USA often champions human rights globally and plays a significant role in international post-conflict interventions.

Role in topic

China

CHN's growing global influence and economic model present an alternative perspective on globalization and development in post-conflict regions.

Role in topic

Germany

DEU, with its strong commitment to human rights and multilateralism, contributes significantly to peacebuilding and development aid.

Role in topic

Brazil

BRA represents a major emerging economy with a unique perspective on South-South cooperation and human rights in the Global South.

Role in topic

India

IND, as the world's largest democracy, offers insights into managing diversity and promoting human rights within a complex societal structure.

Role in topic

Japan

JPN's post-war reconstruction and its role as a major aid donor provide a perspective on economic recovery and peacebuilding.

Role in topic

Russia

RUS, as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, holds a significant geopolitical role in discussions on international security and post-conflict resolutions.

Role in topic

France

FRA, with its colonial history and commitment to universal human rights, plays a role in international interventions and development.

Role in topic

South Africa

ZAF's experience with truth and reconciliation offers a unique model for addressing historical injustices in post-conflict societies.

Role in topic

United Kingdom

The GBR, a permanent member of the UN Security Council, contributes to international peace and security efforts and human rights advocacy.

Role in topic

Canada

CAN is known for its commitment to multilateralism, peacekeeping, and human rights advocacy on the international stage.

Role in topic

Chile

CHL's transition from authoritarian rule to democracy provides insights into human rights and institutional reform in post-conflict contexts.

Role in topic

Norway

NOR is a prominent mediator in peace processes and a significant donor for humanitarian aid and development.

Role in topic

Netherlands

The NLD is a strong advocate for international law, human rights, and justice, often hosting international tribunals.

Role in topic

Topics & background

The background behind each topic and the actors that shape it.

Public Policy in a Globalized Era

Key players

Globalization: Trajectories and Tensions

Key players

Human Rights in the Contemporary International Order

Key players

Post-Conflict Policy and Human Rights

Key players

Globalization's Role in Post-Conflict Recovery

Key players

Human Rights Violations in Post-Conflict Areas

Key players

Reconciliation Processes and Human Rights

Key players

Policy Frameworks for Post-Conflict Societies

Key players

Resources

News, lessons, and country profiles to prep for International Conference on Globalization, Human Rights, and Post-Conflict Policy (ICGHRPCP-26).

Recent reporting to ground your prep

Trump's Legal Battles Impact 2026 Elections

Trump's Economic Reset

Supreme Court's Voting Rights Impact on 2026

GOP Conservative Factions Clash Over Trump

Lessons

Bite-sized lessons to build the basics

Hidden Stakeholders

Engagement Strategies

Dynamic Analysis

Stakeholder Mapping Workshop

Courses

Guided courses that go deeper on the topic

Policy Brief Writing

Conflict Resolution

Advanced Negotiation

Multilateral Negotiation

United Arab Emirates December 2026

By committee

Committees & topics

Why it matters

How to prepare

Country perspectives

Topics & background

Resources

Related conferences

International Conference on Islamic Political Thought and International Relations (ICIPTIR - 26)

International Conference on Islamic Political Thought and International Relations (ICIPTIR)

International Conference on Globalization, Human Rights, and Refugee Policy (ICGHRRP-2026)