Where is the ICCRCMR being held?

The International Conference on Conflict Resolution and Civil-Military Relations is scheduled to take place in Copenhagen, DNK.

International Conference on Conflict Resolution and Civil-Military Relations - ICCRCMR

Name: International Conference on Conflict Resolution and Civil-Military Relations - ICCRCMR
Start: 2026-09-16T00:00:00Z
End: 2026-09-16T00:00:00Z
Location: Chhatak

Sep 16, 2026Chhatak, BangladeshIn-person

Registration open

The International Conference on Conflict Resolution and Civil-Military Relations (ICCRCMR) is set to convene in Copenhagen, Denmark. This event focuses on the critical intersection of conflict resolution strategies and the evolving dynamics of civil-military relations in contemporary global affairs. It provides a platform for scholars, practitioners, and policymakers to engage with current research and practical applications in these fields.

Committees & topics

Topics
Conflict Resolution in Contemporary International Relations · Civil-Military Relations in Democratic and Transitional States · Peacebuilding in Post-Conflict Societies · Security Studies and the Evolving Threat Landscape · Mediation Techniques in International Disputes · Crisis Management in International Affairs · Negotiation Dynamics in International Diplomacy · Policy Development for Peace and Security

Why it matters

In an era marked by complex global challenges, understanding and effectively managing conflict, alongside fostering robust civil-military relations, is paramount. The ICCRCMR addresses this need by bringing together diverse perspectives to explore innovative approaches to peacebuilding and security. The discussions are particularly relevant given the increasing involvement of military forces in humanitarian aid, disaster response, and peacekeeping operations, which blurs traditional lines between civilian and military roles.

The conference's focus on both conflict resolution and civil-military relations highlights the interconnectedness of these domains. Effective conflict resolution often relies on a clear understanding of military capabilities and constraints, while stable civil-military relations are foundational for democratic governance and societal resilience, especially in post-conflict environments. By examining these areas concurrently, the ICCRCMR aims to contribute to more integrated and sustainable solutions for global peace and security. The insights shared at this conference can inform policy development and operational strategies for international organizations, national governments, and non-governmental actors alike.

How to prepare

Delegates preparing for the ICCRCMR should focus on understanding the multifaceted nature of civil-military interactions and contemporary conflict dynamics. Reviewing concepts such as "dynamic-analysis" will be beneficial for assessing evolving conflict landscapes. Furthermore, an understanding of "gender-dynamics-across-cultures" is crucial, as gender considerations increasingly shape both conflict and peacebuilding efforts.

To maximize engagement, participants should consider how different stakeholders, including "hidden-stakeholders", influence conflict trajectories and civil-military cooperation. Preparing to discuss various "engagement-strategies" and their efficacy in diverse contexts will be valuable. A strong grasp of these areas will enable delegates to contribute meaningfully to discussions and network effectively with peers from various backgrounds.

Country perspectives

Where the most-relevant 4 countries stand on the core issues in play. Click through for the full country profile.

United States

A key player in global security, the USA often navigates complex civil-military relations in its extensive international engagements.

Role in topic

The USA's military and diplomatic efforts frequently involve intricate civil-military coordination in conflict zones and humanitarian missions, providing significant case studies for analysis.

Switzerland

Known for its neutrality, CHE plays a significant role in international mediation and humanitarian aid, emphasizing civilian-led conflict resolution.

Role in topic

CHE's experience in facilitating peace talks and hosting international organizations offers valuable insights into non-military approaches to conflict resolution and the importance of civilian leadership.

Denmark

As the host nation, DNK has a strong tradition of international cooperation and contributions to peacekeeping missions, often emphasizing a comprehensive approach to security.

Role in topic

DNK's experience in integrating military and civilian efforts in international operations, particularly in fragile states, provides a relevant national perspective on civil-military relations and conflict resolution.

Japan

JPN's post-war constitution limits its military's role to self-defense, leading to a unique civil-military dynamic focused on international cooperation and humanitarian assistance.

Role in topic

JPN's approach to international security, emphasizing non-military contributions and development aid, offers a distinct model for civil-military relations in peacebuilding contexts.

Topics & background

The background behind each topic and the actors that shape it.

Conflict Resolution in Contemporary International Relations

Conflict resolution as a structured field emerged after World War II, drawing on the work of scholars such as Johan Galtung and Kenneth Boulding, and was institutionalized through the UN Charter's Chapter VI provisions on the pacific settlement of disputes. The Cold War constrained multilateral resolution efforts, but the post-1989 era saw a proliferation of negotiated settlements, from the 1995 Dayton Accords ending the Bosnian War to the 2016 Colombian peace agreement with the FARC. These cases established a toolkit combining track-one diplomacy, third-party mediation, power-sharing arrangements, and transitional justice mechanisms. Contemporary conflicts have proven less amenable to classical resolution frameworks. Civil wars in Syria, Yemen, Sudan, and the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo involve fragmented armed groups, transnational sponsors, and overlapping criminal economies that defeat conventional negotiation models. The return of great-power competition has further eroded UN Security Council consensus, leaving regional bodies such as the African Union, ASEAN, and the OSCE to carry growing mediation burdens. Debates today center on whether liberal peacebuilding templates remain viable, how to integrate non-state armed actors into political settlements, and how to sequence ceasefires, humanitarian access, and political transitions.

Key players

Civil-Military Relations in Democratic and Transitional States

Civil-military relations concern how societies subordinate armed forces to legitimate political authority while maintaining military effectiveness. Samuel Huntington's 'objective control' model and Morris Janowitz's 'constabulary' framework shaped Western thinking after 1945, with NATO accession criteria later codifying democratic oversight as a benchmark. The post-1989 democratic transitions across Latin America, Central Europe, and parts of Africa produced significant reforms — defense ministries staffed by civilians, parliamentary oversight committees, and shrinking military prerogatives in domestic politics. This trajectory has partially reversed in the past decade. Coups in Mali, Burkina Faso, Guinea, Niger, and Gabon between 2020 and 2023 returned West and Central Africa to levels of military intervention not seen since the 1990s. Myanmar's 2021 coup ended a decade of partial liberalization, while Sudan's 2021 putsch and the 2023 SAF-RSF war demonstrated how unresolved security-sector pluralism can collapse into civil war. Even in consolidated democracies, debates over military deployments in domestic policing, intelligence oversight, and the politicization of senior officer corps have intensified. The field now grapples with hybrid civil-military arrangements, the role of private military companies such as the Wagner Group's successors, and security-sector reform in post-conflict environments.

Key players

Peacebuilding in Post-Conflict Societies

Peacebuilding entered the international lexicon with UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali's 1992 'An Agenda for Peace,' which distinguished it from peacekeeping and peacemaking as the long-term work of preventing relapse into violence. The 2005 World Summit established the UN Peacebuilding Commission, Peacebuilding Fund, and Peacebuilding Support Office, creating dedicated architecture for post-conflict recovery, institution-building, and reconciliation. Liberal peacebuilding — combining elections, market liberalization, and rule-of-law reform — became the dominant template through operations in Sierra Leone, Liberia, Timor-Leste, and Kosovo. The model has come under sustained critique. Approximately half of post-conflict states relapse into violence within a decade, as seen in South Sudan after 2011 and the Central African Republic. The 2015 'Sustaining Peace' twin resolutions reoriented UN doctrine toward prevention and nationally-owned strategies, and the 2020 review emphasized financing gaps and the need to address root causes including climate stress and inequality. Current peacebuilding debates focus on adapting to non-permissive environments where peacekeepers have withdrawn (Mali, DRC), integrating women and youth meaningfully per Resolutions 1325 and 2250, and aligning donor incentives with locally-led recovery rather than externally-imposed benchmarks.

Key players

Security Studies and the Evolving Threat Landscape

Security studies originated as a Cold War subfield focused on nuclear strategy, deterrence, and bipolar competition, exemplified by the work of Thomas Schelling and Bernard Brodie. The end of the Cold War triggered a broadening of the field — the Copenhagen School's securitization theory, human security frameworks adopted in the UNDP's 1994 Human Development Report, and feminist and critical security approaches challenged the state-centric paradigm. Issues such as environmental degradation, pandemic disease, and forced migration entered the security agenda. The field has since witnessed a partial return to traditional concerns. Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine revived interest in conventional deterrence, alliance politics, and nuclear signaling, while U.S.-China competition has reframed the Indo-Pacific around great-power rivalry. Simultaneously, novel threat vectors — offensive cyber operations, military applications of artificial intelligence, hypersonic weapons, and the weaponization of supply chains and undersea cables — have outpaced existing arms-control architecture. Climate-security linkages, recognized by the UN Security Council's 2007 debate and subsequent resolutions, remain contested but increasingly central. Contemporary security studies must reconcile these traditional and non-traditional agendas while addressing the erosion of multilateral verification regimes.

Key players

Mediation Techniques in International Disputes

Modern international mediation traces its lineage to figures such as Ralph Bunche, whose 1949 Rhodes armistice negotiations earned the first Nobel Peace Prize awarded to a UN mediator. The UN's 2012 Guidance for Effective Mediation codified principles including consent, impartiality, inclusivity, and national ownership, while the Mediation Support Unit and Standby Team of Senior Mediation Advisers institutionalized professional practice. Track-two and track-three dialogues, often facilitated by NGOs such as the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue and the Crisis Management Initiative, have complemented official efforts. Mediation practice has diversified considerably. Insider mediators, religious actors, and women mediator networks have expanded the pool of practitioners beyond traditional diplomatic envoys. Digital tools now enable remote dialogue, large-scale consultation, and conflict mapping, though they raise concerns about disinformation and surveillance. Recent high-profile efforts illustrate both promise and limits: Qatari and Egyptian mediation in Gaza, Omani back-channels between the U.S. and Iran, Turkish facilitation of the Black Sea Grain Initiative, and Saudi-Chinese brokerage of the 2023 Iran-Saudi rapprochement. Contemporary debates concern mediator proliferation and 'forum shopping' by parties, the inclusion of armed non-state actors, and how mediators navigate sanctions regimes and ICC arrest warrants.

Key players

Crisis Management in International Affairs

Crisis management emerged as a distinct discipline during the Cold War, shaped by the lessons of the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, which demonstrated the value of direct communication, signaling discipline, and face-saving off-ramps. Subsequent crises — the 1973 Yom Kippur War, the 1983 Able Archer scare, and the 1999 Kargil conflict — refined doctrine around escalation control, hotlines, and confidence-building measures. The European OSCE framework, the ASEAN Regional Forum, and various nuclear risk-reduction agreements institutionalized many of these practices. The contemporary crisis environment is more complex and more fragmented. Multiple simultaneous flashpoints — the Russia-NATO interface, the Taiwan Strait, the Korean Peninsula, the Red Sea, and the Iran-Israel confrontation — strain decision-makers' bandwidth and increase the risk of inadvertent escalation. Compressed decision cycles driven by social media, AI-enabled targeting, and offensive cyber capabilities reduce the time available for deliberation. Many Cold War-era risk-reduction mechanisms have lapsed or are under strain, including New START's uncertain future after 2026 and the suspension of NATO-Russia and U.S.-China military-to-military dialogues at various points. Current debates focus on rebuilding crisis communication channels, applying crisis-management frameworks to non-military emergencies such as pandemics and climate disasters, and integrating private-sector actors whose infrastructure underpins critical systems.

Key players

Negotiation Dynamics in International Diplomacy

The systematic study of international negotiation accelerated in the 1980s with the Harvard Negotiation Project's principled-negotiation framework and Robert Putnam's 'two-level games' theory, which highlighted the interaction of domestic and international bargaining. Major multilateral negotiations — the Uruguay Round of trade talks, the Montreal Protocol on ozone, the 1995 NPT extension, and the 2015 Paris Agreement — provided extensive case material on coalition-building, issue linkage, and the role of chairs and facilitators. Bilateral landmarks including the 1978 Camp David Accords and the 2015 JCPOA refined understanding of secret diplomacy, sequencing, and verification. The negotiating environment has shifted significantly. Multilateral consensus-based forums increasingly produce lowest-common-denominator outcomes or fail outright, as seen in repeated WTO Ministerial Conferences and stalled UN Security Council reform. Coalitions of the willing, minilateral arrangements, and plurilateral agreements have proliferated as alternatives. Domestic polarization in many democracies shortens the shadow of the future and reduces the credibility of negotiated commitments, while authoritarian centralization elsewhere can speed agreement but raise implementation risks. Current scholarship and practice emphasize negotiation under conditions of low trust, the role of AI in preparation and simulation, and how to negotiate effectively with parties subject to sanctions, ICC indictments, or non-recognition.

Key players

Policy Development for Peace and Security

Policy development in peace and security has historically oscillated between top-down doctrinal exercises — such as U.S. National Security Strategies, NATO Strategic Concepts, and EU Global Strategies — and bottom-up reform processes driven by lessons from operations. The post-Cold War decade produced ambitious doctrines including the Responsibility to Protect, endorsed at the 2005 World Summit, and the Women, Peace and Security agenda launched by UNSCR 1325 in 2000. These frameworks reshaped how states and international organizations conceived legitimate intervention, gender mainstreaming, and civilian protection. Implementation has consistently lagged ambition. R2P's invocation in Libya in 2011 generated lasting controversy that constrained subsequent applications in Syria and beyond. The 2015 'troika' of UN reviews — on peace operations, peacebuilding architecture, and Resolution 1325 — diagnosed systemic weaknesses, many of which persist. The current Pact for the Future, adopted in 2024, and the parallel New Agenda for Peace propose updated frameworks for prevention, disarmament, and governance of new technologies, but face financing shortfalls and geopolitical division. Policy development today must contend with shrinking multilateral consensus, the rise of regional organizations as primary security providers in some theaters, and the integration of climate, cyber, and AI considerations into traditional defense and diplomatic planning.

Key players

Resources

News, lessons, and country profiles to prep for International Conference on Conflict Resolution and Civil-Military Relations - ICCRCMR.

Recent reporting to ground your prep

Actor Vijay's Political Move

Trump's Economic Reset

GOP Promotes Trump's Tax Savings on Deadline

Howard Lutnick's Senate Testimony on 2027 Bud

Lessons

Bite-sized lessons to build the basics

Dynamic Analysis

Gender Dynamics Across Cultures

Understanding Motivations

Hidden Stakeholders

Courses

Guided courses that go deeper on the topic

Conflict Resolution

Advanced Negotiation

Multilateral Negotiation

Policy Brief Writing

Bangladesh September 2026

By committee

Frequently asked questions

International Conference on Conflict Resolution and Civil-Military Relations - ICCRCMR

Sep 16, 2026Chhatak, BangladeshIn-person

Registration open

Committees & topics

Topics
Conflict Resolution in Contemporary International Relations · Civil-Military Relations in Democratic and Transitional States · Peacebuilding in Post-Conflict Societies · Security Studies and the Evolving Threat Landscape · Mediation Techniques in International Disputes · Crisis Management in International Affairs · Negotiation Dynamics in International Diplomacy · Policy Development for Peace and Security

Why it matters

How to prepare

Country perspectives

Where the most-relevant 4 countries stand on the core issues in play. Click through for the full country profile.

United States

A key player in global security, the USA often navigates complex civil-military relations in its extensive international engagements.

Role in topic

The USA's military and diplomatic efforts frequently involve intricate civil-military coordination in conflict zones and humanitarian missions, providing significant case studies for analysis.

Switzerland

Known for its neutrality, CHE plays a significant role in international mediation and humanitarian aid, emphasizing civilian-led conflict resolution.

Role in topic

Denmark

As the host nation, DNK has a strong tradition of international cooperation and contributions to peacekeeping missions, often emphasizing a comprehensive approach to security.

Role in topic

Japan

JPN's post-war constitution limits its military's role to self-defense, leading to a unique civil-military dynamic focused on international cooperation and humanitarian assistance.

Role in topic

JPN's approach to international security, emphasizing non-military contributions and development aid, offers a distinct model for civil-military relations in peacebuilding contexts.

Topics & background

The background behind each topic and the actors that shape it.

Conflict Resolution in Contemporary International Relations

Key players

Civil-Military Relations in Democratic and Transitional States

Key players

Peacebuilding in Post-Conflict Societies

Key players

Security Studies and the Evolving Threat Landscape

Key players

Mediation Techniques in International Disputes

Key players

Crisis Management in International Affairs

Key players

Negotiation Dynamics in International Diplomacy

Key players

Policy Development for Peace and Security

Key players

Resources

News, lessons, and country profiles to prep for International Conference on Conflict Resolution and Civil-Military Relations - ICCRCMR.

Recent reporting to ground your prep

Actor Vijay's Political Move

Trump's Economic Reset

GOP Promotes Trump's Tax Savings on Deadline

Howard Lutnick's Senate Testimony on 2027 Bud

Lessons

Bite-sized lessons to build the basics

Dynamic Analysis

Gender Dynamics Across Cultures

Understanding Motivations

Hidden Stakeholders

Courses

Guided courses that go deeper on the topic

Conflict Resolution

Advanced Negotiation

Multilateral Negotiation

Policy Brief Writing

Bangladesh September 2026

By committee

Committees & topics

Why it matters

How to prepare

Country perspectives

Topics & background

Resources

Related conferences

Roadmap for Trade, Growth and Economic Diplomacy: Conference 2026

International Conference on Violence, Conflict, and Global Governance

Understanding South Asian Geopolitics in the Context of Bangladesh

International Conference on Conflict Resolution, Peacebuilding, and Human Rights (ICCRPHR)

International Conference on Taxation, Innovation, and Economic Policy (ICTIEP-2026)

International Conference on Historical Political Analysis and Comparative Studies

Frequently asked questions

Committees & topics

Why it matters

How to prepare

Country perspectives

Topics & background

Resources

Related conferences

Roadmap for Trade, Growth and Economic Diplomacy: Conference 2026

International Conference on Violence, Conflict, and Global Governance

Understanding South Asian Geopolitics in the Context of Bangladesh

International Conference on Conflict Resolution, Peacebuilding, and Human Rights (ICCRPHR)

International Conference on Taxation, Innovation, and Economic Policy (ICTIEP-2026)

International Conference on Historical Political Analysis and Comparative Studies

Frequently asked questions