Bloc strategy
Map allies, swing votes, and red lines. Who do you talk to first, and why? Built for Model UN delegates who want a draft that reads like real diplomacy — not a Wikipedia summary.
Key highlights
Allies and swing votes mapped
Who's with you, who's gettable, and the concession that wins each swing delegation.
Opposition red lines
The lines you can't cross without losing the other bloc entirely.
Outreach order
Who to caucus with first, second, third — and the case to make to each.
Compromise language
Draft working-paper text built to draw both sides toward the middle.
About this template
Unmoderated caucus is won by whoever walks in with a plan. This template maps the committee for your country: who your natural allies are and why, which swing delegations are gettable and what concession wins each, and the opposing bloc's red lines you can't cross without losing them entirely.
It turns that map into a sequence — who to caucus with first, second, and third, and the specific case to make to each — and hands you compromise language for a working paper that could pull both sides. Instead of improvising the politics, you arrive knowing who to talk to and what to say.
Model Diplomat vs. generic AI
The same prompt in a general chatbot can produce something that reads right and isn't. Here's the difference.
| Aspect | This template | ChatGPT / generic AI |
|---|---|---|
| Sources | Primary documents, cited and openable | Often fabricated, or none at all |
| Format | Conference-ready, in your committee's standard structure | A blank page — you supply the format |
| Verifiability | Every claim checkable against its source | No way to tell what's real |
| Built for the work | Tuned for diplomacy, politics, and law | General-purpose, not domain-aware |
| Cost | Free to start | — |
Who it's for
MUN delegates
Preparing a bloc strategy for an upcoming committee and want it conference-ready.
First-time delegates
Learning the formats and registers that experienced delegations already know.
Chairs and dais staff
Modeling what a strong, well-sourced submission looks like for the committee.
Anyone assigned a tough country
Needing to argue a position that isn't their own, grounded in the real record.
What you'll fill in
A preview of the 3 fields you'll complete in the composer — the rest is written for you.
The prompt
This is what lands in your composer — edit the [blanks] and send.
Bloc strategy for [country] in UN Security Council (UNSC) on [topic]. Map: (1) natural allies and the basis of alignment — historical, ideological, or interest-based; (2) swing delegations, what each one wants, and what concession would win them; (3) opposing bloc and the red lines you can't cross without losing them entirely; (4) outreach order — who to caucus with first, second, third, and the case to make to each; (5) compromise language for a working paper that could draw both sides.
Start from this template
Model Diplomat fills it in with answers grounded in primary sources — every claim comes with a citation you can check.
Related templates
Browse all →Country brief
Foreign-policy position on a topic, with allies, voting record, and rationale.
Position paper
Conference-ready paper in your committee's standard format. Footnoted and exportable.
Crisis prep
Background, escalation tree, likely directives, and a personal-portfolio brief.
Resolution draft
Preambular and operative clauses with proper UN formatting and cited precedent.