What is the primary focus of the ICTIEP-2026 conference?

The conference focuses on the interconnections between taxation, innovation, and economic policy.

What type of participants are expected at this conference?

The conference is designed for academics, researchers, and policymakers.

What kind of content will be presented at the conference?

Participants will present new research and discuss policy implications related to taxation, innovation, and economic development.

International Conference on Taxation, Innovation, and Economic Policy (ICTIEP-2026)

Name: International Conference on Taxation, Innovation, and Economic Policy (ICTIEP-2026)
Start: 2026-08-17T00:00:00Z
End: 2026-08-18T00:00:00Z
Location: Dhaka

Aug 17–18, 2026Dhaka, BangladeshIn-person

Starts in 9 daysRegistration open

The International Conference on Taxation, Innovation, and Economic Policy (ICTIEP-2026) is set to convene in Dhaka, Bangladesh. This event brings together academics, researchers, and policymakers to explore the intricate relationships between tax systems, technological innovation, and broader economic development. The conference provides a platform for presenting new research, discussing policy implications, and fostering collaboration on these critical global issues. Participants will delve into various aspects of taxation, including its role in fostering or hindering innovation, its impact on economic growth, and the challenges of adapting tax policies to rapidly evolving technological landscapes. The discussions are expected to cover both theoretical frameworks and practical case studies, offering insights relevant to diverse national contexts.

Committees & topics

Topics
Business and Economics: Navigating Global Market Transformation · Public Economics: Fiscal Capacity in an Era of Competing Demands · Taxation and Innovation in Modern Economies · Economic Policy for Fostering Innovation · Impact of Tax Incentives on Startups and Entrepreneurship · Public Finance and Technological Advancement · Tax Policy and Research Funding · Behavioral Economics in Taxation

Why it matters

In an era of rapid technological advancement and increasing global economic interdependence, understanding the nexus of taxation, innovation, and economic policy is paramount. Effective tax policies can incentivize research and development, support emerging industries, and ensure equitable distribution of economic benefits. Conversely, poorly designed tax regimes can stifle innovation, deter investment, and exacerbate economic disparities. This conference addresses these complex dynamics, providing a crucial forum for shaping future policy directions.

The insights generated from ICTIEP-2026 are particularly relevant for developing economies, which often face unique challenges in balancing revenue generation with the need to foster innovation and attract foreign investment. The discussions will contribute to a more nuanced understanding of how different countries can leverage their tax systems to achieve sustainable economic growth and technological progress. By bringing together diverse perspectives, the conference aims to inform policy decisions that promote both economic vitality and social equity.

Furthermore, the conference's focus on innovation extends beyond technological advancements to include novel approaches in policy design and implementation. This holistic perspective is essential for developing resilient and adaptive economic frameworks capable of navigating future disruptions and opportunities. The outcomes of this gathering will likely influence academic discourse and policy recommendations for years to come.

How to prepare

Delegates preparing for ICTIEP-2026 should focus on understanding the multifaceted impacts of taxation on innovation and economic policy. A strong grasp of various tax models, their economic consequences, and their influence on different sectors of the economy is crucial. Consider how specific tax incentives or disincentives might affect the lifecycle of innovative ventures, from initial research to market commercialization.

It is advisable to conduct a thorough analysis of the economic context of the host city, Dhaka, BGD, and the broader region of Asia. Understanding the prevailing economic policies, innovation ecosystems, and tax structures in this context will provide valuable background for the discussions. Delegates should also be prepared to engage with diverse perspectives, recognizing that what constitutes effective policy can vary significantly across different national and economic environments.

Consider utilizing frameworks such as "dynamic-analysis" to evaluate the long-term effects of policy choices. Additionally, preparing to discuss the roles of various "hidden-stakeholders" in the taxation and innovation landscape, including industry associations, labor unions, and international organizations, will enhance contributions. Familiarity with different "engagement-strategies" for policy advocacy and implementation will also be beneficial.

Country perspectives

Where the most-relevant 6 countries stand on the core issues in play. Click through for the full country profile.

Bangladesh

As the host nation, BGD is keenly interested in exploring tax policies that can stimulate innovation and drive economic development within its unique economic context.

Role in topic

BGD serves as a significant example of a developing economy grappling with the challenges and opportunities of integrating innovation into its economic policy framework, particularly concerning taxation.

United States

The USA often champions tax policies that encourage private sector innovation and investment, while also debating the role of taxation in addressing wealth inequality and funding public research.

Role in topic

The USA's experience with venture capital, corporate tax reforms, and intellectual property rights offers valuable case studies for discussions on innovation and taxation.

China

CHN focuses on leveraging its tax system to support strategic industries and technological self-reliance, often through targeted subsidies and tax breaks for high-tech sectors.

Role in topic

CHN's state-led innovation model and its use of taxation as a tool for industrial policy provide a contrasting perspective to market-driven approaches.

Germany

DEU emphasizes stable and predictable tax environments to support its strong manufacturing and engineering sectors, often with an eye towards fostering sustainable innovation.

Role in topic

DEU's approach to taxation and innovation, particularly its focus on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and vocational training, offers insights into supporting established industrial bases.

Singapore

SGP employs a highly competitive tax regime and targeted incentives to attract foreign direct investment and position itself as a global hub for innovation and technology.

Role in topic

SGP's success in using tax policy to build a knowledge-based economy provides a model for other nations seeking to enhance their innovation ecosystems.

Estonia

EST is known for its progressive digital governance and seeks to align its tax policies with its e-residency and digital innovation initiatives.

Role in topic

EST offers a unique perspective on how digital transformation can influence and be influenced by taxation and economic policy, particularly in a smaller, agile economy.

Topics & background

The background behind each topic and the actors that shape it.

Business and Economics: Navigating Global Market Transformation

The intersection of business strategy and macroeconomic policy has been reshaped by successive shocks since 2008: the global financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, supply-chain disruptions, and the inflation surge of 2021-2023. Central banks in advanced economies tightened monetary policy aggressively, while emerging markets faced capital outflows and currency pressures. Firms simultaneously confronted accelerated digitalization, ESG reporting mandates, and the reorganization of global value chains under 'friend-shoring' and industrial policy frameworks such as the U.S. CHIPS Act and the EU Green Deal Industrial Plan. Today the core dispute is how to reconcile open trade and competition with national security, climate transition, and resilience objectives. The OECD and IMF warn that fragmenting trade blocs could reduce global GDP by several percentage points over the long run, while proponents of strategic autonomy argue targeted intervention is necessary to correct market failures and rebuild domestic productive capacity. Debates also center on corporate taxation, market concentration in digital platforms, and the productivity slowdown across the OECD.

Key players

Public Economics: Fiscal Capacity in an Era of Competing Demands

Public economics studies how governments raise revenue and allocate spending to address market failures, redistribute income, and provide public goods. Since the pandemic, public debt-to-GDP ratios across advanced economies have risen to historic peaks—above 120% in the United States and Italy and near 260% in Japan—while demands on the public purse have multiplied: aging populations, defense rearmament in Europe, climate adaptation, and healthcare modernization. The IMF's 2024 Fiscal Monitor warned that current trajectories are unsustainable without structural reforms to either taxation or entitlement systems. The central dispute concerns who bears the burden of fiscal consolidation. Progressive coalitions advocate higher taxes on capital, wealth, and multinational profits, citing the OECD/G20 BEPS Inclusive Framework and the 15% global minimum tax (Pillar Two) implemented from 2024. Others emphasize spending efficiency, means-testing, and growth-oriented reforms. Developing economies, meanwhile, face acute fiscal space constraints, with tax-to-GDP ratios often below 15%, limiting their ability to finance the SDGs absent international tax cooperation.

Key players

Taxation and Innovation in Modern Economies

Tax systems were largely designed for industrial-era economies in which value creation was tied to physical assets and stable jurisdictions. The rise of intangible capital—software, patents, brands, data—has eroded traditional corporate tax bases, as multinationals shift profits to low-tax jurisdictions through transfer pricing of intellectual property. The OECD estimated annual revenue losses of USD 100-240 billion from base erosion and profit shifting before the BEPS reforms. In response, more than 140 jurisdictions agreed in 2021 to a Two-Pillar Solution, reallocating taxing rights over the largest multinationals (Pillar One) and establishing a 15% global minimum effective rate (Pillar Two). The core dispute is whether such reforms adequately balance revenue mobilization with incentives to innovate. Critics argue that high effective rates on R&D-intensive firms deter risk-taking, while patent boxes and super-deductions for research expenditure have proliferated—over 20 OECD countries now offer preferential IP regimes. The UN Tax Committee, backed by African states, has pushed for a parallel UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation (negotiations launched 2024), arguing the OECD process insufficiently serves developing-country interests.

Key players

Economic Policy for Fostering Innovation

Endogenous growth theory, advanced by Romer and Aghion, established that innovation is the principal long-run driver of productivity and that knowledge spillovers justify public support. Since the 1980s, governments have deployed an expanding toolkit: direct R&D subsidies, public research institutions, university-industry partnerships, mission-oriented programs (DARPA, Horizon Europe), and competition policy to keep markets contestable. The U.S. CHIPS and Science Act (2022), the EU Chips Act (2023), and China's Made in China 2025 represent a new generation of industrial policies explicitly framed around frontier technologies. A central tension persists between horizontal policies (broad R&D credits, education, IP protection) and vertical policies (targeted sectoral support, national champions). Critics warn of capture, deadweight loss, and trade frictions; proponents cite climate technology and semiconductor security as cases where market signals alone are inadequate. The OECD reports global R&D intensity has stagnated near 2.7% of GDP in advanced economies, with Korea and Israel exceeding 5% while many emerging economies remain below 1%.

Key players

Impact of Tax Incentives on Startups and Entrepreneurship

Tax incentives for early-stage firms emerged as a major policy instrument following the 1990s tech boom and expanded after 2008, when venture funding contracted sharply. Instruments include capital gains exemptions (e.g., U.S. Qualified Small Business Stock under Section 1202), R&D tax credits with refundability for loss-making firms, employee stock option deferrals, and angel investor reliefs such as the UK's SEIS/EIS schemes, which have channeled over GBP 25 billion into early-stage companies. France's JEI (Jeune Entreprise Innovante) status and Singapore's startup tax exemption scheme are widely studied analogues. The empirical debate concerns additionality—whether incentives generate new entrepreneurship or merely subsidize activity that would have occurred anyway. OECD evaluations suggest refundable R&D credits are particularly effective for cash-constrained startups, while broad capital gains exemptions show weaker evidence of effect. Equity concerns also feature: incentives tend to benefit founders and investors disproportionately concentrated in major metropolitan regions, raising questions about geographic and demographic inclusivity of innovation policy.

Key players

Public Finance and Technological Advancement

Public finance has historically funded the foundational research underpinning technological revolutions—from radar and the internet to mRNA vaccines and GPS. Mariana Mazzucato's 'Entrepreneurial State' literature documents that nearly all general-purpose technologies of the past century traced significant inputs to public funding. The U.S. federal R&D budget peaked at 1.9% of GDP during Apollo but has since declined to around 0.7%, even as private R&D has risen. The European Research Area and China's growing basic research allocations represent alternative public-finance models for technology leadership. The contemporary dispute concerns both the level and structure of public technology finance. Mission-oriented agencies like ARPA-E, ARIA (UK), and SPRIND (Germany) experiment with high-risk grant models, while sovereign wealth and strategic investment funds—Singapore's Temasek, France's Bpifrance, the EU's InvestEU—blur lines between public finance and equity investment. Critics warn of crowding out, picking-winners failures, and fiscal risk; supporters argue that climate technology, AI safety, and pandemic preparedness present coordination problems no private actor will solve.

Key players

Tax Policy and Research Funding

Governments support research through two main fiscal channels: direct grants and indirect tax expenditures, principally R&D tax credits. The OECD's R&D tax incentive database shows that over 30 of 38 OECD members now offer some form of credit, with indirect support exceeding direct funding in countries such as France, Australia, and the United Kingdom. Designs vary widely—volume-based versus incremental, refundable versus non-refundable, with or without SME enhancements. The U.S. permanent R&D tax credit (Section 41), expanded by the PATH Act of 2015, contrasts with the UK's recently reformed merged RDEC scheme (2024) that consolidated SME and large-company reliefs amid fraud concerns. The central policy question is the optimal mix between tax-based and grant-based instruments. Tax credits offer neutrality and predictability but reward incremental work that might occur anyway; competitive grants can target breakthrough research but involve administrative costs and political risk. Evaluations by the OECD and the U.S. Government Accountability Office suggest each additional dollar of tax credit generates roughly USD 1 of additional R&D—modest additionality—while basic research grants yield higher long-run social returns but lower private capture.

Key players

Behavioral Economics in Taxation

Traditional public finance assumed taxpayers are rational utility-maximizers responding only to statutory rates. Behavioral research—building on work by Kahneman, Thaler, Chetty, and Saez—has shown that salience, defaults, loss aversion, and social norms substantially shape tax compliance and economic responses. The establishment of behavioral insights units in over 200 governments and international organizations since the UK's Behavioural Insights Team (2010) has institutionalized this approach. Studies by HMRC, the IRS, and Denmark's tax authority have demonstrated that simple letter redesigns and norm-based messaging can lift voluntary compliance by several percentage points, generating substantial revenue at minimal cost. The emerging policy debate concerns scope and ethics. Pre-populated tax returns, used in Nordic countries and Chile, have dramatically reduced filing burden and errors; behaviorally-informed audit notices have raised collections. Yet critics question manipulation, distributional effects (nudges may regressively affect less-informed taxpayers), and whether behavioral fixes substitute for needed structural reform. The OECD's Tax Administration 3.0 agenda foregrounds these tools as part of a broader shift toward proactive, data-driven, taxpayer-centered administration.

Key players

Resources

News, lessons, and country profiles to prep for International Conference on Taxation, Innovation, and Economic Policy (ICTIEP-2026).

Recent reporting to ground your prep

US Job Openings at 6.7M

Trump's Legal Battles Impact 2026 Elections

Trump's Economic Reset

GOP Conservative Factions Clash Over Trump

Lessons

Bite-sized lessons to build the basics

Hidden Stakeholders

Engagement Strategies

Dynamic Analysis

Stakeholder Mapping Workshop

Courses

Guided courses that go deeper on the topic

Policy Brief Writing

Advanced Negotiation

Multilateral Negotiation

Conflict Resolution

The states in play, with the data that shapes their stance

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Bangladesh August 2026

By committee

Frequently asked questions

International Conference on Taxation, Innovation, and Economic Policy (ICTIEP-2026)

Aug 17–18, 2026Dhaka, BangladeshIn-person

Starts in 9 daysRegistration open

Committees & topics

Topics
Business and Economics: Navigating Global Market Transformation · Public Economics: Fiscal Capacity in an Era of Competing Demands · Taxation and Innovation in Modern Economies · Economic Policy for Fostering Innovation · Impact of Tax Incentives on Startups and Entrepreneurship · Public Finance and Technological Advancement · Tax Policy and Research Funding · Behavioral Economics in Taxation

Why it matters

How to prepare

Country perspectives

Where the most-relevant 6 countries stand on the core issues in play. Click through for the full country profile.

Bangladesh

As the host nation, BGD is keenly interested in exploring tax policies that can stimulate innovation and drive economic development within its unique economic context.

Role in topic

United States

The USA often champions tax policies that encourage private sector innovation and investment, while also debating the role of taxation in addressing wealth inequality and funding public research.

Role in topic

The USA's experience with venture capital, corporate tax reforms, and intellectual property rights offers valuable case studies for discussions on innovation and taxation.

China

CHN focuses on leveraging its tax system to support strategic industries and technological self-reliance, often through targeted subsidies and tax breaks for high-tech sectors.

Role in topic

CHN's state-led innovation model and its use of taxation as a tool for industrial policy provide a contrasting perspective to market-driven approaches.

Germany

DEU emphasizes stable and predictable tax environments to support its strong manufacturing and engineering sectors, often with an eye towards fostering sustainable innovation.

Role in topic

DEU's approach to taxation and innovation, particularly its focus on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and vocational training, offers insights into supporting established industrial bases.

Singapore

SGP employs a highly competitive tax regime and targeted incentives to attract foreign direct investment and position itself as a global hub for innovation and technology.

Role in topic

SGP's success in using tax policy to build a knowledge-based economy provides a model for other nations seeking to enhance their innovation ecosystems.

Estonia

EST is known for its progressive digital governance and seeks to align its tax policies with its e-residency and digital innovation initiatives.

Role in topic

EST offers a unique perspective on how digital transformation can influence and be influenced by taxation and economic policy, particularly in a smaller, agile economy.

Topics & background

The background behind each topic and the actors that shape it.

Business and Economics: Navigating Global Market Transformation

Key players

Public Economics: Fiscal Capacity in an Era of Competing Demands

Key players

Taxation and Innovation in Modern Economies

Key players

Economic Policy for Fostering Innovation

Key players

Impact of Tax Incentives on Startups and Entrepreneurship

Key players

Public Finance and Technological Advancement

Key players

Tax Policy and Research Funding

Key players

Behavioral Economics in Taxation

Key players

Resources

News, lessons, and country profiles to prep for International Conference on Taxation, Innovation, and Economic Policy (ICTIEP-2026).

Recent reporting to ground your prep

US Job Openings at 6.7M

Trump's Legal Battles Impact 2026 Elections

Trump's Economic Reset

GOP Conservative Factions Clash Over Trump

Lessons

Bite-sized lessons to build the basics

Hidden Stakeholders

Engagement Strategies

Dynamic Analysis

Stakeholder Mapping Workshop

Courses

Guided courses that go deeper on the topic

Policy Brief Writing

Advanced Negotiation

Multilateral Negotiation

Conflict Resolution

The states in play, with the data that shapes their stance

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Bangladesh August 2026

By committee

Committees & topics

Why it matters

How to prepare

Country perspectives

Topics & background

Resources

Related conferences

Roadmap for Trade, Growth and Economic Diplomacy: Conference 2026

International Conference on Violence, Conflict, and Global Governance

Understanding South Asian Geopolitics in the Context of Bangladesh

International Conference on Historical Political Analysis and Comparative Studies

International Conference on Historical Political Analysis and Comparative Studies (ICHPA)

International Conference on Leadership, Human Rights, and International Law (ICLHRIL)

Frequently asked questions

Committees & topics

Why it matters

How to prepare

Country perspectives

Topics & background

Resources

Related conferences

Roadmap for Trade, Growth and Economic Diplomacy: Conference 2026

International Conference on Violence, Conflict, and Global Governance

Understanding South Asian Geopolitics in the Context of Bangladesh

International Conference on Historical Political Analysis and Comparative Studies

International Conference on Historical Political Analysis and Comparative Studies (ICHPA)

International Conference on Leadership, Human Rights, and International Law (ICLHRIL)

Frequently asked questions