Where is the Resilience Reimagined Summit taking place?

The summit is scheduled to take place in Clark, PHL.

What is the primary focus of the i4C.PH – Resilience Reimagined Summit?

The summit's primary focus is on reimagining resilience strategies across various sectors to address contemporary global challenges.

i4C.PH – Resilience Reimagined Summit 2026

Name: i4C.PH – Resilience Reimagined Summit 2026
Start: 2026-09-15T00:00:00Z
End: 2026-09-17T00:00:00Z
Location: Clark

Sep 15–17, 2026Clark, PhilippinesIn-person

Registration open

The i4C.PH – Resilience Reimagined Summit is an international gathering focused on enhancing resilience across various sectors. Hosted in Clark, PHL, this event brings together experts and stakeholders to discuss innovative strategies and collaborative approaches to address contemporary challenges. The summit emphasizes the importance of reimagining resilience in an increasingly complex global landscape, fostering dialogue on how communities, systems, and infrastructure can better withstand and adapt to disruptions.

Committees & topics

Topics
Integrated Security: Converging Physical, Cyber, and Human Threats · Crisis Resilience: Governing Through Compounding Shocks · Digital Trust in an Era of AI and Disinformation · Disaster Risk Reduction Under the Sendai Framework · Emergency Preparedness for All-Hazards Response · Community Resilience and Locally Led Adaptation · Physical Security of Critical Infrastructure and Public Spaces · Cybersecurity and Norms for State Behavior in Cyberspace

Why it matters

In an era marked by rapid technological advancements, environmental shifts, and evolving geopolitical dynamics, the concept of resilience has become paramount. This summit offers a critical platform for participants to explore multifaceted approaches to resilience, moving beyond traditional emergency response to proactive adaptation and sustainable development. The discussions will likely cover a broad spectrum of topics, from cybersecurity and critical infrastructure protection to climate change adaptation and economic stability.

The insights shared and connections forged at this event are vital for developing robust strategies that can safeguard societies against future shocks. By convening in PHL, a nation frequently exposed to diverse challenges, the summit gains a unique contextual relevance. It provides an opportunity to examine both global best practices and localized solutions, ensuring that discussions are grounded in practical application and real-world impact. The collaborative environment aims to inspire actionable outcomes that can strengthen national and international resilience frameworks.

How to prepare

Delegates preparing for the i4C.PH – Resilience Reimagined Summit should focus on understanding the multifaceted nature of resilience. Familiarity with concepts such as Dynamic Analysis and Engagement Strategies will be beneficial, as the summit is expected to delve into adaptive planning and stakeholder collaboration. Participants should be ready to engage in discussions about innovative solutions and cross-sector partnerships.

Consider how different stakeholders, including those often overlooked, contribute to or are affected by resilience initiatives. The Hidden Stakeholders lesson offers valuable insights into identifying and engaging all relevant parties. Furthermore, understanding the process of What Is Stakeholder Mapping? and participating in a Stakeholder Mapping Workshop can enhance one's ability to contribute effectively to discussions on building comprehensive resilience strategies. The summit's focus on reimagining resilience suggests a need for creative thinking and a willingness to challenge conventional approaches.

Country perspectives

Where the most-relevant 1 countries stand on the core issues in play. Click through for the full country profile.

Philippines

As the host nation, PHL is a key participant, sharing its experiences and challenges in building resilience against natural disasters and other threats.

Role in topic

PHL, as the host country, provides a crucial perspective on resilience, particularly concerning disaster preparedness and climate change adaptation. Its geographic location makes it highly susceptible to various natural hazards, offering valuable case studies and lessons learned in developing robust national and local resilience strategies. The summit in Clark will likely highlight PHL's efforts in integrating technology and community-based approaches to enhance its adaptive capacity.

Topics & background

The background behind each topic and the actors that shape it.

Integrated Security: Converging Physical, Cyber, and Human Threats

Integrated security emerged as a doctrine in the early 2000s as governments recognized that physical, cyber, and personnel threats could no longer be managed in silos. The 9/11 attacks, the 2007 cyber assault on Estonia, and the 2010 Stuxnet operation against Iranian centrifuges each demonstrated that adversaries routinely blended kinetic, digital, and insider vectors. In response, frameworks such as the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA, established 2018), the EU's NIS and NIS2 Directives, and ISO/IEC 27001 began pushing organizations toward unified risk management across domains. The core dispute today is how to operationalize convergence without overcentralizing authority or eroding civil liberties. States diverge on whether integrated security should be led by intelligence services, civilian regulators, or military commands, and on how far obligations should extend to private operators of critical infrastructure. Developing states, including the Philippines, face the additional challenge of building integrated frameworks while still maturing baseline capabilities in cyber defense, port and aviation security, and continuity of government. Current practice clusters around hybrid threat centers (such as the Helsinki-based European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats), national risk registers, and public-private information-sharing arrangements. Debates continue over standards harmonization, cross-border incident response, and the role of the UN in setting norms for protecting critical infrastructure against combined cyber-physical attacks.

Key players

Crisis Resilience: Governing Through Compounding Shocks

Crisis resilience as a policy concept matured after the 2008 financial crisis and gained urgency through the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and Fukushima accident, which exposed cascading failures across energy, supply chain, and governance systems. The COVID-19 pandemic then demonstrated that modern crises are rarely singular: health emergencies trigger economic, social, and security shocks simultaneously. The OECD, World Bank, and UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) have since promoted 'all-hazards' and 'resilience dividend' approaches that emphasize anticipation, absorption, and adaptation rather than mere response. The central debate concerns how states balance redundancy with efficiency. Lean, just-in-time systems—prized for two decades—proved brittle during pandemic-era shortages of semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, and food. Yet building strategic reserves, diversifying suppliers, and maintaining surge capacity carries fiscal costs that many developing states cannot easily bear. There is also contention over governance: whether resilience should be coordinated by dedicated national resilience offices, embedded in finance ministries, or distributed across sectoral regulators. Current international work focuses on the Sendai Framework's midterm review, the WHO Pandemic Agreement negotiations, and climate adaptation finance under the UNFCCC. For the Philippines and similar climate-exposed economies, resilience is increasingly framed as a development issue inseparable from disaster risk, debt sustainability, and digital continuity.

Key players

Digital Trust in an Era of AI and Disinformation

Digital trust—confidence that online systems, identities, and information behave as expected—has moved from a technical concern to a geopolitical one. Early frameworks such as the EU's eIDAS regulation (2014) and India's Aadhaar system addressed identity assurance, while the 2018 Cambridge Analytica revelations, repeated ransomware attacks on hospitals, and the rapid spread of generative AI since 2022 broadened the agenda to platform integrity, content authenticity, and algorithmic accountability. The 2024 UN Global Digital Compact placed digital trust alongside connectivity and rights as a core pillar of international digital governance. The core dispute is who sets the rules. The EU has advanced binding regimes—the Digital Services Act, AI Act, and eIDAS 2.0 with its European Digital Identity Wallet—while the United States favors sectoral regulation and voluntary standards led by NIST. China promotes a sovereignty-based model with mandatory algorithm registration and data localization. Many Global South states, including the Philippines, are building national digital ID and e-government stacks while negotiating whether to align with EU, U.S., or domestic frameworks for cross-border data flows. Ongoing flashpoints include deepfake regulation, content provenance standards (such as C2PA), the future of end-to-end encryption, and liability for AI-generated harms. Trust in elections, financial systems, and public services increasingly depends on resolving these debates without fragmenting the global internet.

Key players

Disaster Risk Reduction Under the Sendai Framework

Modern disaster risk reduction (DRR) traces to the 1990s UN International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction and consolidated through the Hyogo Framework for Action (2005–2015) and its successor, the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. Sendai shifted the emphasis from response to prevention, set seven global targets covering mortality, economic loss, and infrastructure damage, and recognized disasters as deeply intertwined with climate change, urbanization, and inequality. UNDRR coordinates implementation, while the Warsaw International Mechanism addresses loss and damage under the UNFCCC. The central dispute is financing and accountability. The Sendai midterm review in 2023 found that progress on most targets is off-track, with disaster losses rising as climate hazards intensify. Developing states argue that DRR cannot be separated from climate adaptation finance and the new Loss and Damage Fund agreed at COP27 and operationalized at COP28. Donor states emphasize risk-informed investment, insurance mechanisms, and private-sector engagement, while small island and archipelagic states press for concessional finance and debt relief tied to disaster clauses. The Philippines, consistently ranked among the world's most disaster-exposed countries, has become an important laboratory for early warning systems, anticipatory action, and locally led adaptation. Debates ahead of the post-2030 successor framework center on integrating systemic risk, biological hazards, and cascading cyber-physical failures into DRR architecture.

Key players

Emergency Preparedness for All-Hazards Response

Emergency preparedness as a structured discipline grew out of Cold War civil defense, then evolved through the 1979 creation of the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency, the 2005 International Health Regulations revision after SARS, and the post-2011 emphasis on whole-of-society readiness. Preparedness encompasses planning, training, stockpiling, exercising, and public communication for hazards ranging from earthquakes and pandemics to industrial accidents and armed attacks. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed severe gaps in even highly ranked systems, prompting the Global Health Security Agenda's renewal and the ongoing WHO Pandemic Agreement negotiations. The key dispute is the balance between standing capacity and surge capability. States with strong fiscal positions maintain dedicated agencies, strategic reserves, and routine national exercises; others rely heavily on international assistance through mechanisms such as the UN Disaster Assessment and Coordination (UNDAC) system, INSARAG urban search-and-rescue teams, and the ASEAN Coordinating Centre for Humanitarian Assistance (AHA Centre). Tensions also persist over civil-military coordination, the role of armed forces in domestic emergencies, and data sharing across borders during fast-moving crises. Current priorities include integrating climate projections into contingency planning, modernizing public alerting (cell broadcast, Common Alerting Protocol), and preparing for biological, chemical, and radiological events. The Philippines' NDRRMC framework, ASEAN's One ASEAN One Response, and the EU Civil Protection Mechanism are leading regional models.

Key players

Community Resilience and Locally Led Adaptation

Community resilience emerged as a counterweight to top-down emergency management, drawing on disaster sociology research after events such as Hurricane Katrina (2005) and the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, which showed that survival and recovery depended heavily on local social networks, trust, and prior preparation. The Sendai Framework, the Paris Agreement's adaptation goal, and the 2022 Principles for Locally Led Adaptation endorsed by over 100 organizations have all elevated community agency as central to resilience policy. The core dispute concerns power and resources. Donors and national governments often retain control over funding, planning, and data, while affected communities—particularly indigenous peoples, urban informal settlers, and small-island populations—argue that resilience investments fail when designed without their leadership. Debates focus on direct access modalities to climate funds (such as the Green Climate Fund's Enhanced Direct Access), recognition of traditional knowledge, and protection of community leaders, including environmental defenders. In the Philippines and across Southeast Asia, community-based DRR through barangay-level councils, people's organizations, and church and civil society networks has become a recognized model. Current questions include how to scale community resilience without bureaucratizing it, how to integrate mental health and social cohesion into resilience metrics, and how to ensure that digital tools strengthen rather than displace local institutions.

Key players

Physical Security of Critical Infrastructure and Public Spaces

Physical security policy has been reshaped by three waves: post-9/11 counterterrorism hardening of transport and government facilities; the 2010s rise of attacks on soft targets such as concerts, markets, and places of worship; and the more recent targeting of energy and undersea infrastructure, exemplified by the 2022 Nord Stream pipeline sabotage and repeated incidents involving subsea cables in the Baltic. Standards such as ISO 22341 (security by design), ASIS guidelines, and sector-specific regimes for ports (ISPS Code), aviation (ICAO Annex 17), and nuclear facilities (IAEA INFCIRC/225) form the international baseline. The central dispute is the boundary between security and openness. Aggressive hardening of public spaces can erode civil liberties, accessibility, and the urban character that makes cities livable. Privatization of security services raises accountability concerns, particularly where armed private guards operate at scale. States also disagree on attribution and response to gray-zone attacks on infrastructure that fall below the threshold of armed conflict, including drone incursions near airports and arson against telecommunications sites. Current priorities include counter-UAS systems, protection of energy and submarine cable networks, crowded-places guidance (such as the UK's Martyn's Law), and convergence with cybersecurity as physical access control, surveillance, and building systems become networked.

Key players

Cybersecurity and Norms for State Behavior in Cyberspace

Cybersecurity moved decisively onto the international agenda after the 2007 attacks on Estonia, the 2010 Stuxnet operation, and the 2017 WannaCry and NotPetya campaigns, which together demonstrated that cyber operations could disrupt states, hospitals, and global shipping. Since 2004, successive UN Groups of Governmental Experts and, since 2019, the Open-Ended Working Group on ICT have negotiated voluntary norms of responsible state behavior, including obligations not to target critical infrastructure and to assist states whose infrastructure is attacked from their territory. Parallel processes have produced the 2001 Budapest Convention on Cybercrime and, in 2024, the UN Convention against Cybercrime. The core dispute pits states favoring an open, multistakeholder internet governed by existing international law against those advocating a new treaty rooted in state sovereignty and information control. Russia and China have pressed for a more state-centric regime, while the United States, EU, and most democracies emphasize applicability of international humanitarian law, human rights, and existing norms. Ransomware, supply-chain compromises (notably SolarWinds in 2020), and AI-enabled attacks have sharpened questions about deterrence, attribution, and the role of private cybersecurity firms. For states like the Philippines, the agenda includes capacity building, protection of critical information infrastructure under national CICP frameworks, and participation in regional cooperation through ASEAN and the UN. The OEWG's successor mechanism, post-2025, will determine whether cyber norms are codified, expanded, or remain voluntary.

Key players

Resources

News, lessons, and country profiles to prep for i4C.PH – Resilience Reimagined Summit 2026.

Recent reporting to ground your prep

Arming an archipelago: Is time running out for Europe's oldest DMZ? | Euronews

Comprehensive approach to security: Federal Council launches consultation on Switzerland's security policy strategy

Georgia Considers Position in New South Caucasus Transit Era - Jamestown

North Korea's Nuclear Navy Developments

Lessons

Bite-sized lessons to build the basics

Hidden Stakeholders

Engagement Strategies

Dynamic Analysis

Stakeholder Mapping Workshop

Courses

Guided courses that go deeper on the topic

Advanced Negotiation

Multilateral Negotiation

Policy Brief Writing

Conflict Resolution

Philippines September 2026

By committee

Frequently asked questions

i4C.PH – Resilience Reimagined Summit 2026

Sep 15–17, 2026Clark, PhilippinesIn-person

Registration open

Committees & topics

Topics
Integrated Security: Converging Physical, Cyber, and Human Threats · Crisis Resilience: Governing Through Compounding Shocks · Digital Trust in an Era of AI and Disinformation · Disaster Risk Reduction Under the Sendai Framework · Emergency Preparedness for All-Hazards Response · Community Resilience and Locally Led Adaptation · Physical Security of Critical Infrastructure and Public Spaces · Cybersecurity and Norms for State Behavior in Cyberspace

Why it matters

How to prepare

Country perspectives

Where the most-relevant 1 countries stand on the core issues in play. Click through for the full country profile.

Philippines

As the host nation, PHL is a key participant, sharing its experiences and challenges in building resilience against natural disasters and other threats.

Role in topic

Topics & background

The background behind each topic and the actors that shape it.

Integrated Security: Converging Physical, Cyber, and Human Threats

Key players

Crisis Resilience: Governing Through Compounding Shocks

Key players

Digital Trust in an Era of AI and Disinformation

Key players

Disaster Risk Reduction Under the Sendai Framework

Key players

Emergency Preparedness for All-Hazards Response

Key players

Community Resilience and Locally Led Adaptation

Key players

Physical Security of Critical Infrastructure and Public Spaces

Key players

Cybersecurity and Norms for State Behavior in Cyberspace

Key players

Resources

News, lessons, and country profiles to prep for i4C.PH – Resilience Reimagined Summit 2026.

Recent reporting to ground your prep

Arming an archipelago: Is time running out for Europe's oldest DMZ? | Euronews

Comprehensive approach to security: Federal Council launches consultation on Switzerland's security policy strategy

Georgia Considers Position in New South Caucasus Transit Era - Jamestown

North Korea's Nuclear Navy Developments

Lessons

Bite-sized lessons to build the basics

Hidden Stakeholders

Engagement Strategies

Dynamic Analysis

Stakeholder Mapping Workshop

Courses

Guided courses that go deeper on the topic

Advanced Negotiation

Multilateral Negotiation

Policy Brief Writing

Conflict Resolution

Philippines September 2026

By committee

i4C.PH – Resilience Reimagined Summit 2026

Committees & topics

Why it matters

How to prepare

Country perspectives

Topics & background

Integrated Security: Converging Physical, Cyber, and Human Threats

Crisis Resilience: Governing Through Compounding Shocks

Digital Trust in an Era of AI and Disinformation

Disaster Risk Reduction Under the Sendai Framework

Emergency Preparedness for All-Hazards Response

Community Resilience and Locally Led Adaptation

Physical Security of Critical Infrastructure and Public Spaces

Cybersecurity and Norms for State Behavior in Cyberspace

Resources

Joint Maritime Conference 2026

Asian Defense & Security Exhibition (ADAS) 2026

49th FAEA Annual Conference

The 17th Global Labour University International Conference

Frequently asked questions

i4C.PH – Resilience Reimagined Summit 2026

Committees & topics

Why it matters

How to prepare

Country perspectives

Topics & background

Integrated Security: Converging Physical, Cyber, and Human Threats

Crisis Resilience: Governing Through Compounding Shocks

Digital Trust in an Era of AI and Disinformation

Disaster Risk Reduction Under the Sendai Framework

Emergency Preparedness for All-Hazards Response

Community Resilience and Locally Led Adaptation

Physical Security of Critical Infrastructure and Public Spaces

Cybersecurity and Norms for State Behavior in Cyberspace

Resources

Joint Maritime Conference 2026

Asian Defense & Security Exhibition (ADAS) 2026

49th FAEA Annual Conference

The 17th Global Labour University International Conference

Frequently asked questions

Committees & topics

Why it matters

How to prepare

Country perspectives

Topics & background

Resources

Related conferences

Joint Maritime Conference 2026

Asian Defense & Security Exhibition (ADAS) 2026

49th FAEA Annual Conference

The 17th Global Labour University International Conference

Frequently asked questions

Committees & topics

Why it matters

How to prepare

Country perspectives

Topics & background

Resources

Related conferences

Joint Maritime Conference 2026

Asian Defense & Security Exhibition (ADAS) 2026

49th FAEA Annual Conference

The 17th Global Labour University International Conference

Frequently asked questions