Russia's War Tactics: Force and Culture

Russia Uses Force and Culture to Shape the War

Deadly strikes across Ukraine and Russia’s return to Venice both serve the same aim: normalize coercion while Kyiv scrambles to keep attention on the war.

Russia is using violence to reset the diplomatic calendar. The death toll from strikes across Ukraine has risen to at least 27, making this one of the deadliest rounds of attacks so far this year, with killings reported in Zaporizhzhia, Kramatorsk, Dnipro and the Poltava gas fields. The attacks landed just hours before the deadline for Kyiv’s proposed open-ended ceasefire, turning a humanitarian gesture into a test of resolve rather than a path to talks. (The Guardian)

Pressure on Kyiv, not compromise

The pattern matters more than the body count alone. Moscow has repeatedly paired battlefield pressure with public diplomacy around May 9, trying to frame itself as the side favoring “peace” while keeping the tempo of strikes high. That playbook was visible again this week: Ukraine said it would halt fire on May 6, while Russian messaging centered on Victory Day and rejected the idea of a broader pause. The result is leverage, not negotiation — Russia tries to force Kyiv into discussing ceasefires on Moscow’s timetable, under conditions Moscow can violate or redefine. (Le Monde; BBC)

Ukraine’s immediate loser is not just civilians, though they pay the highest price. It is also Kyiv’s effort to keep Western capitals focused on air defense, sanctions enforcement, and the costs of Russian escalation. When Russia can kill 27 people in a single wave and still command the diplomatic stage, the burden shifts to Ukraine to prove that restraint is not weakness. For background on the wider geopolitical frame, see Global Politics and International.

Venice shows Russia still wants normalization

The Venice Biennale dispute is the softer side of the same campaign. Russia’s pavilion is back at the 2026 edition after a four-year absence, despite opposition from the Italian government, EU officials, and a joint letter from 22 European culture ministers urging organizers to reconsider. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said the bloc sees Russia’s return as “morally wrong” and has moved to cut funding to the Biennale over the decision. (POLITICO; POLITICO)

That matters because Moscow benefits from any venue that makes its isolation look temporary. The Biennale gives the Kremlin exactly what it wants: proof that European institutions cannot sustain a unified cultural boycott while the war continues. Ukraine loses symbolic ground here too; Russia gains a platform to argue that sanctions are porous and that elite Europe is tiring of the war. The jury’s resignation over Russia’s participation only sharpened the split. (BBC; POLITICO)

What to watch next

The next decision point is May 9: Russia’s Victory Day parade, the likely moment for more ceasefire theater, and the Venice Biennale’s opening, where Europe will decide whether to tolerate Russian cultural re-entry or widen the boycott. If the strikes continue through that date, the message is plain: Moscow is still trading lives for leverage, and it believes the payoff is diplomatic normalcy.