Pakistan's Gulf Gambit: Saving the MoU

Pakistan's Gulf Gambit: Saving the Islamabad MoU From Iran's Missiles

After Iran struck Bahrain and Kuwait on June 28, Pakistan told the UN Security Council on July 2, 2026 it has intensified shuttle diplomacy to keep the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding — and its own mediator role — alive.

Pakistan's message to the UN Security Council on July 2, 2026 was less a statement of principle than a rescue operation: Islamabad is racing to preserve the 14-point Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding it midwifed on June 18, because if that framework collapses under Iran's fresh strikes on Bahrain and Kuwait, Pakistan loses the single most valuable diplomatic asset it has acquired in a generation — its status as the only capital both Washington and Tehran will still take calls from. The mediator has become the guarantor, and the guarantor now needs the deal to hold more than either signatory does.

The strike that put the MoU on life support

On June 28, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps launched ballistic missiles and drones at the US Ali Al Salem Air Base in Kuwait and the US Fifth Fleet headquarters in Bahrain, in retaliation for American strikes on five Iranian coastal targets near Sirik and Qeshm, Al Jazeera reported. Bahrain sounded air-raid sirens; Kuwait activated air defences; Oman, Qatar and the UAE condemned the attack within hours.

The strikes came exactly ten days after Presidents Donald Trump and Masoud Pezeshkian electronically signed the Islamabad MoU — a 14-point framework committing both sides to the "immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts," the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, and 60 days of negotiations toward a final deal, as published by the BBC. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who countersigned as mediator, called it the "Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding" in a public post — the naming rights were themselves a diplomatic prize.

Bahrain, a non-permanent UNSC member for 2026–2027, convened the emergency session on July 2. Pakistan's Permanent Representative Ambassador Asim Iftikhar Ahmad used it to plant a flag: Islamabad, he said, has "stepped up its diplomatic engagement with key regional and international stakeholders to facilitate follow-up and implementation" of the MoU, per The Express Tribune. He condemned the Iranian strikes on GCC states, reiterated Pakistan's "principled position on the inadmissibility of any use of force outside the bounds of international law," and pledged solidarity with "our brothers and sisters in Bahrain and Kuwait."

Iran's ambassador, Amir-Saeid Iravani, retorted from the same chamber that US bases in the Gulf bring "nothing but insecurity," accusing Council members and Bahrain of blaming the victim, Al Jazeera's live coverage recorded. The UK's Chargé d'Affaires James Kariuki, in a text released by the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, called Iran's attacks "reckless" and "directly contrary to resolution 2817," while endorsing "the implementation of the US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding and the ongoing negotiations," according to gov.uk. That British sentence — condemn Iran, but save the Pakistani-brokered deal — is now the P3 consensus. Pakistan wrote it.

Why Islamabad, and not Doha or Muscat, holds the pen

The conventional Gulf mediators — Qatar and Oman — have been present but not primary in this crisis. Qatar co-facilitated the Bürgenstock implementation talks; Oman is negotiating the new Hormuz transit regime with Tehran. But the political architecture of the ceasefire was Pakistani.

The reasons are structural. Pakistan shares a 900-km border with Iran, hosts the world's second-largest Shia population, and has a Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement (SMDA) with Saudi Arabia signed on September 17, 2025 that treats an attack on one as an attack on both, Al Jazeera detailed. It is, in Chatham House's phrase, mediating from a "dazzling reinvention" of its own image — a former "strategic destabilizer" the Trump administration now treats as an indispensable channel, the think tank observed.

The connective tissue is personal. Field Marshal Asim Munir, Pakistan's army chief and de facto foreign-policy principal, has been on the phone with US Vice President JD Vance, envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi throughout the crisis. Trump referred to Sharif and Munir as "two fantastic people" during the April 8 ceasefire, and, according to the Council on Foreign Relations, "Pakistan actually achieved something many diplomats from wealthy democracies and leading global organizations had failed at for nearly five decades: producing direct talks between Washington and Tehran," CFR concluded.

Islamabad also enjoys something Doha does not: a diplomatic vacuum. India, the region's other rising power, was frozen out by Trump's tariffs, H-1B curbs and dispute over the May 2025 India-Pakistan crisis. As the BBC put it, Pakistan is "willing to play unconventional diplomatic games, unlike India," and its senior leaders "have gone out of the way to flatter the president," the broadcaster reported. Flattery — from the Trump Nobel nomination to a World Liberty Financial memorandum — was the entry ticket. Geography and Munir's cell phone did the rest.

What Pakistan is actually doing this week

Ambassador Ahmad's UNSC intervention was the visible tip of a shuttle already under way. Since the June 28 attacks, three tracks are running in parallel:

The GCC track. Pakistan is leaning on the SMDA implicitly: message to Tehran, don't hit Riyadh's neighbours or you force us into the pact. Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar reminded Araghchi of the defence commitment during the war's opening days, telling the Senate on March 3 he had personally asked Iran "to take care of our pact with Saudi Arabia," Al Jazeera reported. Pakistani F-16s are already forward-deployed to Saudi bases. That is the stick.

The Tehran track. Pezeshkian's June state visit to Islamabad — his first foreign trip since the February 28 US-Israeli strikes killed Khamenei — banked political goodwill Pakistan is now spending. Munir has continued direct calls with Araghchi and, per Al Jazeera, Pakistani officials say Tehran and Washington "remain in contact" through Islamabad even when public negotiations stall.

The Washington track. With Vance, Witkoff and Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner already inside the mediation architecture, Islamabad's message is that any US retaliatory escalation now voids Pakistan's ability to restrain Iran's next round. That framing gives Pakistan influence disproportionate to its GDP — because Trump has personally invested reputation in "his" MoU.

The real prize: oil, sanctions relief, and the pipeline

The evidence that Pakistan's diplomacy is working sits not in communiqués but in the futures curve. Brent crude for August delivery fell to $70.82 a barrel on July 2, 2026 — below its February 27 pre-war level and 38% down from the April 30 peak of $126, Al Jazeera reported. Roughly 172 vessels have transited Hormuz since June 18, still well below the pre-war average of 138 per day, the BBC found, but the trend is up. The US Treasury has issued a license permitting sales of Iranian crude until August 21.

For Pakistan, cheaper crude is not incidental — it is the point. As one Islamabad analyst told Al Jazeera, mediation may yield "narrow economic gains, mainly in the form of reduced energy import costs as the Strait of Hormuz reopens and potentially renewed momentum on the Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline if sanctions relief sustains," the outlet reported. Saudi Arabia's $3 billion additional support package on April 17 and the roll-over of a $5 billion facility bought Pakistan the fiscal room to keep mediating, Chatham House noted. Point 7 of the MoU commits the United States to terminating "all types of sanctions" against Iran, including "United Nations Security Council resolutions," under an agreed schedule — a phrase Pakistani officials read as opening the pipeline they abandoned under threat of secondary sanctions.

The vulnerabilities Pakistan is not talking about

The strategy has three exposures.

First, the SMDA with Saudi Arabia is undefined. It commits Pakistan to defend Riyadh, but no one — including Pakistani officials — will say what triggers it. If Iran hits a Saudi oil facility again, and MBS invokes the pact, Islamabad's mediator status collapses instantly. A retired Pakistani three-star general told Al Jazeera the dual role holds only "if any military deployment remains strictly defensive, time-bound, and transparently limited."

Second, the MoU is fragile by design. Iran's lead negotiator, Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, has already said the Strait "will not return to pre-war conditions" and Iran will "receive a fee for services" — directly contradicting Trump's public claim of a "toll-free" strait, Al Jazeera reported. At least 49 attacks on commercial vessels have been recorded in Hormuz since the war began. The IRGC's June 28 strikes suggest hardline factions in Tehran view the MoU as an American trap.

Second-and-a-half, the diplomatic architecture itself is under pressure. UNSC Resolution 2817, adopted 13-0-2 on March 11 with Russia and China abstaining, condemned Iran's attacks "in the strongest terms," Al Jazeera reported at the time. A follow-on Bahrain-drafted resolution on Hormuz maritime security was vetoed on April 7 by Russia and China. As the Gulf International Forum notes, GCC states are now building a "legal archive" through letters to the Secretary-General to seed future sanctions and international claims against Tehran, the Forum documented. Pakistan is walking that fence: condemning Iran verbally at the UNSC while acting as its interlocutor bilaterally.

Third, the domestic politics are ugly. Pakistan's Shia population — the world's second-largest — protested Khamenei's killing; Munir reportedly told Shia clerics, "if you love Iran so much, then go to Iran." That comment, and the F-16 deployments to Saudi Arabia, sit awkwardly with the public sentiment former ambassador Maleeha Lodhi described to the BBC as "overwhelmingly pro-Iran."

Diplomat View

The Islamabad MoU is best understood as a Pakistani foreign-policy patent, not a US-Iran deal. Every subsequent Gulf crisis — this week's included — is a test of whether that patent still generates rents. Our reading: Pakistan will keep the mediator role through the 60-day negotiation window that expires around August 17, 2026, because both Trump and Pezeshkian need the fiction of a going process more than they need a final deal. Beyond that, Islamabad's leverage decays sharply.

The forecast would change under three named conditions: (1) an Iranian strike that kills Americans in Bahrain or Kuwait, which forces a US retaliatory package Pakistan cannot restrain; (2) Saudi Arabia formally invoking the SMDA, which converts Pakistan from mediator to co-belligerent; or (3) a collapse of the Hormuz transit regime that pushes Brent back above $100, which imports oil-import inflation into an economy still on IMF life support. Absent those, expect Pakistan to bank prestige, cheap crude, and Trump's continued fondness for Munir — and to keep the UN podium warm.

What to watch next

• July–August 2026: Implementation talks at Bürgenstock on Hormuz transit fees and IAEA-supervised down-blending of Iran's enriched uranium; the 60-day MoU clock runs out around August 17.
• August 21, 2026: US Treasury Iran-oil sanctions license expires; renewal signals Washington's commitment to sanctions relief under MoU Point 7.
• End-2026: Bahrain's tenure on the UNSC continues through 2027, keeping the Gulf agenda live on the Council. Watch for a follow-on GCC-drafted resolution on Hormuz maritime security — and whether Pakistan votes for, abstains on, or quietly co-sponsors it.

Read today's full | | More on Global Politics