Gambia vs Sweden: UN Voting Alignment
How often do Gambia and Sweden vote the same way at the UN General Assembly? Agreement over every shared roll-call vote since 1946, by year, decade, and topic — plus the resolutions where they split.
Overall agreement
60.2%
of 3,399 shared UN General Assembly votes since 1946
Agreement by year
Agreement by decade
| Decade | Agreement | Shared votes |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 52.1% | 71 |
| 1970 | 60.9% | 588 |
| 1980 | 61.5% | 1,124 |
| 1990 | 62.0% | 469 |
| 2000 | 55.0% | 520 |
| 2010 | 61.1% | 627 |
Agreement by topic
| Topic | Agreement | Shared votes |
|---|---|---|
| Israel–Palestine | 61.4% | 696 |
| Nuclear weapons | 64.7% | 541 |
| Disarmament | 71.1% | 648 |
| Colonialism | 55.4% | 484 |
| Human rights | 35.9% | 697 |
| Economic development | 61.3% | 434 |
Biggest splits
| Resolution | Date | Gambia | Sweden |
|---|---|---|---|
R/69/227 | 2014-12-19 | yes | no |
R/69/188 | 2014-12-18 | no | yes |
R/68/144 UN. HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL--REPORTS | 2013-12-18 | yes | no |
R/65/224 HUMAN RIGHTS ADVANCEMENT | 2010-12-21 | yes | no |
R/63/191 HUMAN RIGHTS, REPORTS | 2008-12-18 | no | yes |
R/63/171 HUMAN RIGHTS ADVANCEMENT | 2008-12-18 | yes | no |
R/62/169 HUMAN RIGHTS, REPORTS, BELARUS | 2007-12-18 | no | yes |
R/62/168 HUMAN RIGHTS, REPORTS, IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF) | 2007-12-18 | no | yes |
R/61/164 Combating defamation of religions: resolution | 2006-12-19 | yes | no |
R/60/171 Situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran : | 2005-12-16 | no | yes |
Frequently asked questions
How often do Gambia and Sweden vote together at the UN?
Gambia and Sweden voted the same way in 60.2% of 3,399 shared UN General Assembly votes since 1946.
Do Gambia and Sweden agree on human rights votes?
On human rights resolutions, Gambia and Sweden mostly disagree: they voted the same way in 35.9% of 697 shared human-rights votes at the UN General Assembly.
When did Gambia and Sweden last disagree at the UN?
Among their biggest recent splits, on 2014-12-19 Gambia voted "yes" and Sweden voted "no" on R/69/227.