Where is the Trans-Regional Seapower Symposium held?

The symposium is held in the city of Venice, ITA.

What is the primary focus of the T-RSS?

The primary focus of the T-RSS is on maritime security and cooperation among international naval forces.

Who typically attends the Trans-Regional Seapower Symposium?

Naval leaders and maritime experts from various countries typically attend the symposium.

15th edition of the Trans-Regional Seapower Symposium (T‑RSS)

Name: 15th edition of the Trans-Regional Seapower Symposium (T‑RSS)
Start: 2026-10-06T00:00:00Z
End: 2026-10-07T00:00:00Z
Location: Venice

Oct 6–7, 2026Venice, ItalyIn-person

Registration open

The Trans-Regional Seapower Symposium (T-RSS) is a significant international gathering focused on maritime security and cooperation. Hosted in Venice, ITA, this event brings together naval leaders and experts from around the globe to discuss critical issues facing the world's oceans and waterways. The symposium serves as a vital platform for fostering dialogue, sharing perspectives, and building consensus on strategies to address complex maritime challenges. The T-RSS aims to enhance understanding and collaboration among navies and maritime stakeholders. Participants engage in discussions covering a wide range of topics, from geopolitical shifts impacting maritime domains to technological advancements and their implications for naval operations. The symposium's format encourages open exchange, allowing for the development of shared approaches to promote stability and security in the global maritime environment.

Committees & topics

Topics
From Regional Waters to Global Influence: Generating Effects Across the Midland Seas of the World · The Geopolitical Background: Global and Regional Dynamics in Comparison · The Pivotal Role of Cooperation among Regional Alliances as Security Providers · Maritime Regional Security Complexes, Global Order and Sea-Based Flows: The Role of Navies · The New Arctic Chessboard: Seapower, Resources and the Race for Connectivity · Future-Proof Capabilities: A Naval Force Designed to Operate Across Oceans, Act Within Regions, and Deliver Effects on the Ground · Future Seas: Industrial Scale, Decisive Mass and Innovation for the Maritime Domain · Future-Proof Leadership: Preparing Maritime Commanders and Sailors for Complexity

Why it matters

The T-RSS is crucial because maritime security is intrinsically linked to global economic stability and geopolitical balance. The free flow of trade, energy resources, and communication cables relies heavily on secure sea lanes. Disruptions in these vital arteries, whether from piracy, territorial disputes, or environmental degradation, can have far-reaching consequences for nations worldwide.

Furthermore, the symposium provides a unique forum for diverse naval powers to engage in direct, high-level discussions. In an era of increasing geopolitical competition and evolving threats, such as hybrid warfare and cyberattacks targeting maritime infrastructure, these dialogues are indispensable. They allow for the identification of common interests, the de-escalation of potential conflicts, and the coordination of responses to shared challenges. The event's location in Venice, ITA, a city with a rich maritime history, further underscores the enduring importance of naval power and international cooperation.

The insights and relationships forged at the T-RSS can directly influence national security policies and international maritime law. By facilitating a deeper understanding of various national perspectives and operational doctrines, the symposium contributes to a more predictable and stable maritime order. This is particularly relevant as new maritime powers emerge and existing ones adapt to a rapidly changing global landscape.

How to prepare

Delegates preparing for the T-RSS should focus on understanding the diverse national interests and strategic priorities of participating countries. This involves conducting thorough research on the maritime security concerns of key naval powers, including their geopolitical alliances and economic dependencies on sea lanes. A comprehensive approach to stakeholder mapping will be invaluable in identifying potential allies and areas of divergence.

Consider the historical context of maritime power and how it has shaped current international relations. Understanding the evolution of naval doctrines and the impact of technological advancements on maritime warfare will provide a strong foundation for engaging in discussions. Delegates should also be prepared to articulate their nation's stance on critical issues such as freedom of navigation, resource exploitation in international waters, and the role of multilateral naval exercises.

Effective participation will also require strong engagement strategies. This includes preparing concise arguments, actively listening to differing viewpoints, and being open to finding common ground. Familiarity with the specific maritime challenges faced by different regions, from the Arctic to the Indo-Pacific, will enable more nuanced and productive contributions to the symposium's discussions. Analyzing the dynamic analysis of current maritime threats will also be beneficial.

Country perspectives

Where the most-relevant 5 countries stand on the core issues in play. Click through for the full country profile.

Italy

As the host nation, ITA emphasizes multilateral cooperation and maintaining stability in the Mediterranean and broader maritime domains.

Role in topic

ITA plays a central role in facilitating dialogue and cooperation among naval powers, leveraging its strategic position and historical maritime expertise to promote regional and global maritime security initiatives.

United States

The USA advocates for freedom of navigation, rules-based international order, and collaborative security efforts to counter global maritime threats.

Role in topic

The USA, with its significant naval presence, is a key participant, contributing to discussions on global maritime security strategies, technological advancements, and interoperability among allied navies.

China

CHN focuses on protecting its growing maritime interests, including trade routes and territorial claims, while promoting a 'community of shared future in the oceans'.

Role in topic

CHN's participation is crucial for understanding evolving maritime power dynamics, particularly concerning its expanding naval capabilities and its stance on international maritime law and regional disputes.

India

IND emphasizes securing its vast coastline and maritime trade, promoting a free and open Indo-Pacific, and enhancing regional maritime partnerships.

Role in topic

IND is a significant voice in discussions on Indo-Pacific maritime security, anti-piracy efforts, and humanitarian assistance/disaster relief operations, reflecting its strategic importance in the Indian Ocean region.

United Kingdom

GBR supports a rules-based international system, freedom of navigation, and collective security through its global naval deployments and alliances.

Role in topic

GBR contributes its extensive naval experience and diplomatic influence to discussions on international maritime law, naval modernization, and addressing emerging threats in various maritime theaters.

Topics & background

The background behind each topic and the actors that shape it.

From Regional Waters to Global Influence: Generating Effects Across the Midland Seas of the World

The world's 'midland seas' — the Mediterranean, the Black Sea, the Baltic, the Red Sea, the Persian Gulf, the South China Sea and the Caribbean — have long been the connective tissue of global trade and strategic competition. Historically dominated by littoral powers or by the Pax Britannica and later the U.S. Navy, these semi-enclosed bodies have re-emerged as contested arenas as middle powers expand their fleets and great powers compete for influence over chokepoints. Some 80% of global trade by volume moves through these waters, and a handful of straits — Hormuz, Bab el-Mandeb, Malacca, the Turkish Straits, the Danish Straits — concentrate strategic risk. Recent crises have demonstrated how regional sea control translates into global effects: Houthi attacks in the Red Sea since late 2023 have rerouted container traffic around the Cape of Good Hope, Russia's Black Sea Fleet operations have disrupted Ukrainian grain exports, and Chinese gray-zone tactics in the South China Sea have tested freedom of navigation. Each regional sea is increasingly understood as a node from which both regional and global influence can be projected. The debate today centers on how navies — particularly those of middle powers — can generate strategic effects beyond their immediate basin, whether through forward presence, coalition operations, capacity-building, or persistent surveillance. The question is no longer simply about sea denial in home waters but about how regional seapower scales into global influence.

Key players

The Geopolitical Background: Global and Regional Dynamics in Comparison

The post-Cold War unipolar moment has given way to a multipolar, contested order in which regional dynamics increasingly shape global outcomes. Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 shattered European security assumptions and reactivated NATO; the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack and the ensuing Gaza war reignited the Middle East; and U.S.–China competition has hardened across the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea and the technology domain. These theaters are increasingly interconnected — Iran arms Russia, North Korea ships shells to the front, and Houthi missiles are Iranian-supplied — collapsing the analytical distinction between regional and global crises. Different regions exhibit distinct logics: Europe is shaped by a land war and rearmament under NATO's New Force Model; the Indo-Pacific is structured by deterrence around Taiwan and the First Island Chain, with AUKUS and the Quad as principal frameworks; the Middle East oscillates between Abraham Accords-style normalization and Iran-aligned 'axis of resistance' escalation; and Africa is increasingly contested by external actors including Russia (via Africa Corps, the successor to Wagner), China, Türkiye and the Gulf states. Comparing these dynamics reveals common drivers — energy and food security, demographic pressure, technology diffusion, and the erosion of arms-control regimes — but very different escalation thresholds and alliance architectures. Understanding this comparative picture is essential for any navy that must operate simultaneously across theaters.

Key players

The Pivotal Role of Cooperation among Regional Alliances as Security Providers

As no single state can secure the maritime commons alone, regional alliances and minilaterals have proliferated as security providers. NATO remains the most institutionalized, with Allied Maritime Command (MARCOM) coordinating Standing Naval Forces and operations such as Sea Guardian in the Mediterranean. In the Indo-Pacific, AUKUS (2021), the Quad, and the Japan-ROK-US trilateral have created overlapping coalitions focused on deterrence and technology. In the Red Sea, the U.S.-led Operation Prosperity Guardian and the EU's Operation Aspides have run in parallel since 2023–2024, illustrating both the possibilities and the limits of coalition coordination. The European Union, through its Common Security and Defence Policy, has matured as a maritime actor via operations Atalanta (counter-piracy off Somalia), Irini (Libya arms embargo) and Aspides (Red Sea escort). Regional bodies such as the African Union, ASEAN, the Gulf Cooperation Council and the Indian Ocean Rim Association add further layers, while frameworks like the Djibouti Code of Conduct and the Yaoundé Architecture address specific maritime crime challenges. The contemporary debate focuses on interoperability across these overlapping arrangements: how to deconflict operations in shared waters, share intelligence (including via maritime domain awareness platforms such as IFC-Singapore and MICA Center), and align rules of engagement. The T-RSS itself is a flagship venue for fostering this navy-to-navy cooperation across regions.

Key players

Maritime Regional Security Complexes, Global Order and Sea-Based Flows: The Role of Navies

Building on Barry Buzan's regional security complex theory, maritime security complexes describe how clusters of states whose security concerns are tightly linked through a shared sea — the Baltic, Black Sea, Mediterranean, Gulf, Indo-Pacific — interact with the broader global order. The sea is simultaneously a medium for flows (energy, containers, data via subsea cables, people, illicit goods) and a stage for competition. Roughly 99% of intercontinental data traffic moves through some 500 submarine cables, and the disruption of Nord Stream (2022), Baltic cable incidents (2023–2024) and Red Sea cable damage (2024) have shown how vulnerable these flows are. Navies are increasingly tasked not only with traditional sea control and deterrence but with protecting these flows: escorting merchant shipping, monitoring shadow fleets evading sanctions, patrolling cable routes, and countering gray-zone activity below the threshold of armed conflict. UNCLOS provides the legal scaffolding, but enforcement depends on naval presence and partnerships. The 2023 BBNJ Agreement on biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction adds a further governance layer. The question for navies is how to balance high-end warfighting readiness with the constabulary and protective missions that secure the global economy — and how regional naval forces can plug into a coherent global order without overstretching or duplicating effort.

Key players

The New Arctic Chessboard: Seapower, Resources and the Race for Connectivity

The Arctic has shifted from a periphery of the Cold War to a contested strategic frontier. Sea-ice retreat is opening the Northern Sea Route along Russia's coast and, prospectively, the Northwest Passage and a Transpolar Route, while exposing estimated reserves of 13% of the world's undiscovered oil and 30% of undiscovered gas, alongside critical minerals and fisheries. Russia has rebuilt Soviet-era bases, fielded the world's largest icebreaker fleet, and integrated the Northern Fleet into a dedicated military district. China has declared itself a 'near-Arctic state' and pursued a 'Polar Silk Road' through investment and research. The Arctic Council, the principal governance forum, has been effectively paralyzed since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, with the seven Western members suspending cooperation with Moscow. Finland's (2023) and Sweden's (2024) accession to NATO has made seven of the eight Arctic states NATO members, fundamentally altering the regional balance. Exercises such as Nordic Response and Cold Response now bring large allied naval and amphibious forces into the High North. The debate centers on how to prevent strategic competition from spilling into open conflict, how to govern emerging shipping lanes and resource extraction, and how navies — including from non-Arctic states with legitimate interests in freedom of navigation — should posture in a region where environmental, commercial and military stakes are converging.

Key players

Future-Proof Capabilities: A Naval Force Designed to Operate Across Oceans, Act Within Regions, and Deliver Effects on the Ground

Modern navies are being asked to do more across a wider geography with finite hulls. The blue-water deployments of the past decade — UK and French carrier strike groups to the Indo-Pacific, Italian and German frigates east of Suez, U.S. carriers shuttling between the Eastern Mediterranean and the Red Sea — have stressed force generation models. At the same time, the Red Sea campaign since 2023 has shown the cost-exchange problem of using multi-million-dollar interceptors against cheap drones, while Ukraine's use of uncrewed surface vessels against the Black Sea Fleet has demonstrated how asymmetric tools can contest sea control. Future-proof navies are therefore being designed for a 'three-layer' role: global reach via carrier and amphibious task groups, sea-based ballistic missile defense and SSNs; regional presence via frigates, OPVs and forward logistics; and effects ashore via Tomahawk-class land-attack, amphibious lift, marines, and integration with space, cyber and special operations. NATO's New Force Model, the U.S. Navy's Distributed Maritime Operations and the U.S. Marine Corps' Force Design 2030, and European Long-Term Capability Plans all point toward more distributed, networked and multi-domain fleets. The debate concerns how to balance high-end platforms with mass and attritable systems, how to integrate uncrewed and AI-enabled capabilities, and how to ensure that a navy designed for one ocean can plug into operations in another.

Key players

Future Seas: Industrial Scale, Decisive Mass and Innovation for the Maritime Domain

The war in Ukraine and the Red Sea campaign have exposed a stark reality: Western defense industrial bases were optimized for low-rate, exquisite production, not for sustained high-intensity operations. Missile inventories have been drawn down faster than they can be replaced, and shipbuilding capacity has consolidated dramatically since the Cold War. By contrast, China now accounts for over half of global commercial shipbuilding output and is delivering naval vessels at a pace unmatched since World War II, while South Korea and Japan retain world-class yards. 'Decisive mass' has re-entered strategic vocabulary: the recognition that quality without quantity cannot sustain deterrence or warfighting in a protracted conflict. Initiatives such as the U.S. Replicator program, the EU's EDIRPA and ASAP munitions acts, AUKUS Pillar II on advanced capabilities, and NATO's Defence Production Action Plan attempt to expand capacity, accelerate procurement of uncrewed systems, and rebuild magazine depth. Innovation is increasingly drawn from the commercial sector — Starlink-like communications, commercial space ISR, autonomy software — while navies experiment with hybrid fleets of crewed and uncrewed platforms. The debate revolves around how to scale industrial output without sacrificing innovation, how to integrate dual-use technology rapidly, and how allied navies can pool demand, share supply chains and standardize munitions to achieve credible mass.

Key players

Future-Proof Leadership: Preparing Maritime Commanders and Sailors for Complexity

The complexity of contemporary maritime operations — multi-domain, multinational, legally intricate, politically sensitive and conducted under intense media scrutiny — places unprecedented demands on naval leadership. Commanders in the Red Sea must make split-second decisions on engaging Houthi drones under international humanitarian law; task force commanders in the Eastern Mediterranean coordinate with a dozen flags; submarine captains operate under strategic ambiguity in contested basins. At the same time, navies worldwide face recruitment and retention crises, with the U.S., Royal, French, German and other navies missing targets in recent years. The profession of arms at sea is also being reshaped by technology: AI-enabled decision support, human-machine teaming with uncrewed platforms, cyber threats to shipboard systems, and the integration of space and information operations into routine tasking. Doctrine such as NATO's Alliance Maritime Strategy, the U.S. tri-service maritime strategy 'Advantage at Sea,' and various national concepts emphasize mission command, ethical judgment under autonomy, and continuous learning. The debate addresses how naval education and training institutions — war colleges, academies, and through-career professional military education — must evolve to produce leaders comfortable with ambiguity, fluent in technology, grounded in international law, and capable of leading diverse crews in coalitions. Talent management, diversity, and the wellbeing of sailors deployed for long periods are integral to this conversation.

Key players

Resources

News, lessons, and country profiles to prep for 15th edition of the Trans-Regional Seapower Symposium (T‑RSS).

Recent reporting to ground your prep

Hilton-Becerra Race Sets Up High-Stakes Clash

Trump's Legal Battles Impact 2026 Elections

Arming an archipelago: Is time running out for Europe's oldest DMZ? | Euronews

Comprehensive approach to security: Federal Council launches consultation on Switzerland's security policy strategy

Lessons

Bite-sized lessons to build the basics

Gender Dynamics Across Cultures

What Is Stakeholder Mapping?

Hidden Stakeholders

Engagement Strategies

Courses

Guided courses that go deeper on the topic

Persuasion & Influence

Crisis Management

Advanced Negotiation

Multilateral Negotiation

The states in play, with the data that shapes their stance

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

Country dossier

By committee

Frequently asked questions

15th edition of the Trans-Regional Seapower Symposium (T‑RSS)

Oct 6–7, 2026Venice, ItalyIn-person

Registration open

Committees & topics

Topics
From Regional Waters to Global Influence: Generating Effects Across the Midland Seas of the World · The Geopolitical Background: Global and Regional Dynamics in Comparison · The Pivotal Role of Cooperation among Regional Alliances as Security Providers · Maritime Regional Security Complexes, Global Order and Sea-Based Flows: The Role of Navies · The New Arctic Chessboard: Seapower, Resources and the Race for Connectivity · Future-Proof Capabilities: A Naval Force Designed to Operate Across Oceans, Act Within Regions, and Deliver Effects on the Ground · Future Seas: Industrial Scale, Decisive Mass and Innovation for the Maritime Domain · Future-Proof Leadership: Preparing Maritime Commanders and Sailors for Complexity

Why it matters

How to prepare

Country perspectives

Where the most-relevant 5 countries stand on the core issues in play. Click through for the full country profile.

Italy

As the host nation, ITA emphasizes multilateral cooperation and maintaining stability in the Mediterranean and broader maritime domains.

Role in topic

United States

The USA advocates for freedom of navigation, rules-based international order, and collaborative security efforts to counter global maritime threats.

Role in topic

China

CHN focuses on protecting its growing maritime interests, including trade routes and territorial claims, while promoting a 'community of shared future in the oceans'.

Role in topic

India

IND emphasizes securing its vast coastline and maritime trade, promoting a free and open Indo-Pacific, and enhancing regional maritime partnerships.

Role in topic

United Kingdom

GBR supports a rules-based international system, freedom of navigation, and collective security through its global naval deployments and alliances.

Role in topic