Traditionally, international investment agreements (IIAs) such as bilateral investment treaties (BITs) imposed obligations almost exclusively on host states while granting rights to foreign investors. The concept of investor obligations reflects a recent rebalancing trend in international investment law, requiring investors themselves to meet substantive standards of conduct as a condition of treaty protection or as standalone duties.
Investor obligations typically cover areas including:
- Compliance with host-state law, often as a precondition to accessing investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS).
- Human rights due diligence, drawing on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (2011).
- Environmental protection and climate-related conduct.
- Anti-corruption, frequently referencing the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention (1997) or the UN Convention against Corruption (2003).
- Labour standards, often referencing core ILO conventions.
- Corporate social responsibility (CSR) clauses.
The clearest treaty examples appear in newer-generation agreements. The 2016 Morocco–Nigeria BIT is widely cited as a model, containing explicit articles on investor obligations regarding environmental and social impact assessments, anti-corruption, and human rights. The Pan-African Investment Code (2016) and the 2019 Netherlands Model BIT similarly incorporate investor responsibilities. The investment chapter of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) Investment Protocol, adopted in 2023, also moves in this direction.
In ISDS practice, tribunals have used investor misconduct to deny jurisdiction or claims. In World Duty Free v. Kenya (ICSID, 2006), the tribunal dismissed a claim tainted by bribery. In Cortec Mining v. Kenya (ICSID, 2018), the tribunal denied protection where the investor failed to comply with mandatory environmental licensing.
The debate over investor obligations is central to UNCITRAL Working Group III discussions on ISDS reform and to UNCTAD's IIA reform agenda. Proponents argue obligations restore legitimacy and policy space for states; critics warn vague duties create legal uncertainty and may chill investment flows, particularly in developing economies seeking capital.
Example
In the 2016 Morocco–Nigeria BIT, both parties agreed that investors must conduct environmental and social impact assessments and uphold human rights standards as binding obligations.
Frequently asked questions
It depends on the instrument. Some newer treaties like the 2016 Morocco–Nigeria BIT contain binding obligations, while many older BITs reference investor conduct only through preambles or non-binding CSR clauses.
Keep learning