New

Interim Measures

Temporary orders issued by international courts or tribunals to preserve rights or prevent harm pending final judgment.

Updated April 23, 2026


How Interim Measures Work in International Law

Interim measures are temporary orders issued by international courts or tribunals to protect the rights of parties involved in a dispute while the court deliberates on the final judgment. These measures are crucial because they maintain the status quo and prevent irreversible harm that could undermine the effectiveness of the eventual decision. For example, an international court may order a state to refrain from certain actions, such as demolishing property or engaging in military activity, to avoid aggravating the dispute.

The process for granting interim measures typically requires the requesting party to demonstrate urgency and the risk of irreparable harm. Courts assess whether delaying action until the final judgment could cause damage that cannot be repaired. The measures are provisional and remain in effect only until the court delivers its final ruling or decides otherwise.

Why Interim Measures Matter

Interim measures serve as a vital tool in international dispute resolution by safeguarding the rights and interests of parties during potentially lengthy legal proceedings. Without these measures, a party could take actions that render the final judgment ineffective or moot. For instance, if a state illegally occupies disputed territory and is not restrained by interim measures, the court's eventual ruling on sovereignty could become meaningless.

Moreover, interim measures enhance the credibility and authority of international courts by demonstrating their ability to manage disputes proactively. They also promote fairness by ensuring that parties do not suffer undue harm or disadvantage while awaiting justice.

Interim Measures vs Provisional Measures

The terms "interim measures" and "provisional measures" are often used interchangeably in international law, but some tribunals may differentiate them based on procedural contexts. Generally, both refer to temporary orders aimed at preserving rights pending final decisions. "Provisional measures" is a term commonly used in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and other bodies, while "interim measures" is frequently used in arbitration settings.

Regardless of terminology, the core purpose remains the same: to prevent harm and preserve the status quo during litigation.

Real-World Examples

  • In the International Court of Justice (ICJ) case between Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (2018), Qatar requested interim measures to protect the rights of its nationals and companies affected by the UAE's blockade. The ICJ ordered the UAE to ensure that certain humanitarian and legal services were not impeded.

  • The International Criminal Court (ICC) may issue interim measures to protect witnesses or evidence during investigations and trials, ensuring the integrity of proceedings.

  • In investment arbitration, tribunals often grant interim measures to prevent a host state from expropriating assets or interfering with ongoing operations of foreign investors until the dispute is resolved.

Common Misconceptions

  • Interim measures decide the case: Interim measures do not determine the merits of a dispute; they only seek to prevent harm before a final judgment.

  • They are permanent: These measures are temporary and cease once the final decision is rendered or the court modifies them.

  • All international courts grant interim measures: Not all tribunals have the authority or practice to issue such measures; it depends on their rules and jurisdiction.

  • They are always enforceable: Enforcement can be challenging in international law, relying on the cooperation of states or parties involved.

Conclusion

Interim measures are indispensable in international law, providing a mechanism to prevent harm and protect rights during disputes. They ensure that judicial decisions remain meaningful and that justice is not undermined by actions taken before the court reaches its final decision. Understanding their function helps clarify how international law maintains order and fairness amid complex geopolitical conflicts.

Example

In 2018, the International Court of Justice issued interim measures ordering the United Arab Emirates to ensure humanitarian services to Qatar were not impeded during their diplomatic dispute.

Frequently Asked Questions