An arbitral award is the final, reasoned decision rendered by an arbitral tribunal that resolves the legal dispute submitted to it. Unlike a court judgment, an award derives its authority from the parties' consent to arbitrate, expressed in a treaty, contract clause, or compromis (special agreement). Awards are generally binding and final, with only narrow grounds for challenge or refusal of enforcement.
In public international law, arbitral awards are issued by tribunals such as those constituted under the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), Annex VII of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), or ad hoc panels. Famous examples include the Alabama Claims award (1872) between the United States and the United Kingdom, and the South China Sea arbitration award rendered by a PCA-administered tribunal in 2016 between the Philippines and China.
In international commercial and investment arbitration, awards are governed by instruments such as the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, which obliges contracting states to enforce awards subject to limited exceptions (Article V), and the 1965 ICSID Convention, whose Article 54 requires member states to enforce ICSID awards as if they were final domestic judgments.
Typical components of an award include:
- Identification of the parties, tribunal, and seat of arbitration
- A summary of the procedural history and submissions
- The tribunal's findings of fact and reasoning on the applicable law
- The dispositif (operative part) setting out the binding orders
- Allocation of costs and, where relevant, dissenting or separate opinions
Awards may be partial (deciding some issues), interim (provisional measures), or final. Grounds for annulment or non-recognition are narrow and usually procedural — for example, lack of jurisdiction, denial of due process, or conflict with public policy — rather than re-examination of the merits.
Example
In July 2016, an Annex VII tribunal administered by the Permanent Court of Arbitration issued an arbitral award in *Philippines v. China*, ruling that China's "nine-dash line" claims in the South China Sea had no legal basis under UNCLOS.
Frequently asked questions
An ICJ judgment is rendered by a standing UN court under its Statute, whereas an arbitral award is issued by a tribunal whose composition and mandate are defined by the disputing parties themselves. Both are binding on the parties to the case.
Keep learning