How do you properly use a motion to divide the question in a resolution?

To use the motion, a delegate formally proposes dividing the resolution or a clause into separate parts for individual voting. The committee then votes on whether to accept this division. If passed, each part is voted on separately, allowing for selective adoption or rejection.

Can a motion to divide the question be overridden or challenged?

Yes, like other procedural motions, it can be challenged or ruled out of order by the chair if deemed inappropriate. Additionally, if the committee votes against the motion, the resolution remains whole for voting.

What happens if a motion to divide the question fails?

If the motion fails, the committee must vote on the draft resolution or clause as a single entity without separation. This means delegates accept or reject the entire text collectively.

Is a motion to divide the question the same as making an amendment?

No, a motion to divide the question separates parts of a resolution for individual voting without changing their content, whereas an amendment modifies the wording or substance of the resolution or clauses.

When is the best time to propose a motion to divide the question?

It is best proposed during the voting procedure or immediately after the draft resolution has been presented and before the final vote, especially when there is clear division among delegates on specific clauses or sections.

Motion to Divide the Question

Positions at a glance

Supporters

The motion helps manage complex resolutions that cover multiple topics or proposals. Often, a draft resolution includes clauses that have varying levels of support among delegates. Without the ability to divide the question, delegates must accept or reject the entire package, which can force them to compromise on issues they strongly disagree with or reject the entire resolution despite agreeing with significant portions. Dividing the question enhances flexibility, encourages Consensus-building, and ensures that the assembly's decisions more accurately reflect the collective opinion on each specific issue.

Opponents

In a MUN committee debating a resolution on environmental policy, delegates might use the motion to divide the question to separate economic development clauses from environmental protection clauses. This allows delegates to support measures promoting economic growth while opposing certain environmental restrictions, leading to a more tailored and representative outcome.

Research it like a delegate

Research on modeldiplomat.com

Ask a follow-up about Motion to Divide the Question

Open a cited briefing in Model Diplomat search — timelines, positions, and sources you can use in committee or exam answers.

Start research on Motion to Divide the Question

Example

During a MUN session, a delegate successfully motioned to divide the question, allowing the committee to vote separately on economic and environmental clauses within the same draft resolution.

Sources

Keep learning

Go deeper than the definition

Courses

Mun Delegate Fundamentals Parliamentary Procedure

Explore all Model United Nations lessons Test yourself with a quiz

How It Works in Model United Nations

In Model United Nations (MUN) simulations, the "Motion to Divide the Question" is a formal procedural tool delegates use to split a Draft Resolution or a specific clause into separate parts for individual consideration and voting. Instead of voting on the entire resolution as a whole, delegates can isolate contentious or distinct sections, allowing for more nuanced decision-making. When this motion is successfully passed, the assembly votes on each divided part separately, which can lead to some parts being adopted while others are rejected.

Why It Matters

Motion to Divide the Question vs Amendment

While both motions affect the content of draft resolutions, they serve different purposes. An amendment modifies the wording or substance of a resolution or clause, potentially changing its meaning or Impact. In contrast, a motion to divide the question does not alter the content but rather separates the resolution or clauses for individual voting. Essentially, amendments change what is being voted on, whereas dividing the question changes how the voting occurs.

Real-World Examples

Common Misconceptions

One common misconception is that a motion to divide the question is the same as splitting the committee or breaking into smaller groups. In reality, it only affects the voting procedure on a resolution, not the committee's structure or debate format. Another misunderstanding is that the motion can be used to remove clauses; however, it only separates clauses for voting, not deletes them outright. Clauses are adopted or rejected based on the subsequent votes after the division.

Research Motion to Divide the Question like a delegate

Positions at a glance

Supporters

Opponents

Research it like a delegate

Ask a follow-up about Motion to Divide the Question

Sources

Go deeper than the definition

Take Motion to Divide the Question beyond the glossary

Research Motion to Divide the Question like a delegate

Positions at a glance

Supporters

Opponents

Research it like a delegate

How It Works in Model United Nations

Why It Matters

Motion to Divide the Question vs Amendment

Real-World Examples

Common Misconceptions

Ask a follow-up about Motion to Divide the Question

Frequently asked questions

How do you properly use a motion to divide the question in a resolution?

Can a motion to divide the question be overridden or challenged?

What happens if a motion to divide the question fails?

Is a motion to divide the question the same as making an amendment?

When is the best time to propose a motion to divide the question?

Sources

Go deeper than the definition

Take Motion to Divide the Question beyond the glossary

How It Works in Model United Nations

Why It Matters

Motion to Divide the Question vs Amendment

Real-World Examples

Common Misconceptions

Frequently asked questions

How do you properly use a motion to divide the question in a resolution?

Can a motion to divide the question be overridden or challenged?

What happens if a motion to divide the question fails?

Is a motion to divide the question the same as making an amendment?

When is the best time to propose a motion to divide the question?