Contempt of court is a legal mechanism by which courts enforce their authority and orders. It generally falls into two categories: civil contempt, which aims to coerce compliance with a court order (for example, paying child support or producing documents), and criminal contempt, which punishes conduct that obstructs justice or disrespects the court. A further distinction is drawn between direct contempt (committed in the presence of the judge, such as outbursts during a hearing) and indirect or constructive contempt (committed outside the courtroom, such as violating an injunction or publishing material that prejudices a trial).
In common law jurisdictions, contempt powers are typically inherent to the judiciary, though many countries have codified them. In the United Kingdom, the Contempt of Court Act 1981 governs publication-related contempt and introduced the "strict liability rule" for media coverage that creates a substantial risk of serious prejudice to active proceedings. In the United States, federal courts derive contempt power from 18 U.S.C. § 401 and Rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. India's Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 distinguishes civil from criminal contempt and has been the basis for several high-profile prosecutions, including the 2020 Supreme Court case against advocate Prashant Bhushan over tweets criticising the judiciary.
Penalties vary by jurisdiction but commonly include fines, imprisonment, or both. In civil contempt, confinement typically ends when the contemnor complies ("the keys to the cell are in their pocket"). Contempt sits in tension with freedom of expression and press freedom, and the European Court of Human Rights has reviewed several contempt cases under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, notably Sunday Times v. United Kingdom (1979), which prompted reform of UK contempt law.
For researchers, contempt is relevant to rule-of-law indicators, judicial independence assessments, and analyses of press freedom in transitional democracies.
Example
In August 2020, the Supreme Court of India held senior advocate Prashant Bhushan guilty of criminal contempt over two tweets criticising the Chief Justice and the Court, fining him one rupee.
Frequently asked questions
Civil contempt is coercive, designed to force compliance with a court order and ends once the party complies. Criminal contempt is punitive, sanctioning past conduct that obstructed or disrespected the court.
Keep learning