New

Position Papers

Write award-winning position papers that establish your credibility before the conference even begins.

Fundamentals

What Makes a Strong Position Paper

Every position paper must include these essential components as recommended by leading MUN programs:

Past Actions & Country History

Detail your country's previous involvement with the issue, including votes on resolutions, domestic policies, and historical context that shapes current positions

Core Problems Identification

Clearly articulate what your country believes are the fundamental issues that must be addressed, showing deep understanding of root causes

National Interests & Priorities

Explain how the issue affects your country specifically and why certain aspects matter more than others to your nation

Proposed Solutions

Present specific, implementable solutions that align with your country's capabilities and interests while addressing global concerns

Challenges & Obstacles

Acknowledge potential difficulties in implementation and how your country plans to overcome them, showing realistic understanding

Call for International Cooperation

Indicate willingness to work with other nations while maintaining your country's core principles and red lines

Formatting Requirements

Follow these standard formatting guidelines to ensure your position paper meets conference requirements:

Length

One page per topic (typically 2 pages total for most committees), strictly enforced at most conferences

Font & Spacing

12-point Times New Roman or Arial font, single-spaced with 1-inch margins on all sides

Header Information

Include committee name, country, topic, delegate name(s) and school at the top of each topic section

Paragraph Structure

Use clear paragraph breaks between sections, no indentation needed, left-aligned text throughout

Citations

Use footnotes or endnotes for citations, Chicago or MLA style preferred, include bibliography if required

Third Person Voice

Write from your country's perspective using third person (e.g., 'Germany believes...' not 'We believe...')

Four Pillars of Research

UN delegate preparation guidance recommends researching these four essential areas:

The UN System

Understand how your committee works, its powers and limitations, past actions, and relationship to other UN bodies

Country History & Culture

Deep dive into your assigned country's government structure, economy, demographics, and cultural values that influence policy

Country's Topic Policies

Research your country's specific stance through government websites, UN speeches, voting records, and domestic legislation

Other Countries' Positions

Understand potential allies and opponents by researching how other nations approach the issue, especially regional partners

Effective Research Sources

Use these credible sources to build a strong foundation for your position paper:

Official UN Documents

UN.org, committee websites, past resolutions, Secretary-General reports, and special rapporteur findings

Government Resources

Foreign ministry websites, national development plans, official statements, and embassy publications

Reputable Think Tanks

Council on Foreign Relations, Brookings Institution, Chatham House, regional policy institutes

Academic Sources

JSTOR, Google Scholar, university publications, peer-reviewed journals on international relations

Quality News Outlets

BBC, Reuters, Al Jazeera, regional newspapers for local perspectives, Foreign Affairs magazine

NGO Reports

Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, relevant specialized NGOs working on your topic

Citation Best Practices

Maintain credibility with proper citation practices:

When to Cite

Any specific statistic, direct quote, unique idea, or controversial claim requires citation

How to Cite

Use consistent format throughout, include author, title, publication, date, and URL/page number

Citation Frequency

Aim for 5-8 citations per page, balancing thorough research with readability

Source Diversity

Use multiple types of sources to show comprehensive research, avoid over-relying on one source

Structure

Classic Three-Section Structure

The most widely accepted format for position papers:

Committee: [Committee Name]
Country: [Country Name]
Topic: [Topic Title]
Delegate: [Your Name]
School: [Your School]

The [Country Name] recognizes the critical importance of [topic] in [context of why it matters globally]. As a nation that [brief relevant characteristic], [Country] brings a unique perspective to this discussion.

[SECTION 1: Background & Past Actions]
[Country Name] has consistently [describe stance] on matters relating to [topic]. In [year], [Country] [specific action taken, such as signing a treaty, passing legislation, or supporting a resolution]. This commitment is evident in our [specific policy/program], which has [measurable outcome]. Furthermore, [Country] has worked with [international bodies/regional organizations] to [collaborative effort].

Our nation's approach is shaped by [key factor such as geography, history, or economic situation]. The [specific challenge or opportunity] has led [Country] to prioritize [specific aspect of the topic]. We have invested [specific resources] in addressing this issue domestically, demonstrating our commitment to finding sustainable solutions.

[SECTION 2: Current Position & Proposed Solutions]
[Country Name] firmly believes that [core position on the issue]. To address the challenges of [topic], we propose the following measures:

First, the establishment of [specific mechanism/program] that would [intended outcome]. This initiative would be funded through [funding mechanism] and overseen by [responsible body]. We envision this working in conjunction with existing frameworks such as [relevant current program].

Second, [Country] calls for [specific action] to ensure [desired result]. This would require [specific steps], with [Country] prepared to [specific commitment]. We believe this approach balances [competing interest 1] with [competing interest 2].

Third, enhanced cooperation through [specific type of partnership] would enable nations to [shared benefit]. [Country] offers its expertise in [relevant area] and seeks to learn from nations that have successfully [relevant achievement].

[SECTION 3: Conclusion]
The delegation of [Country Name] stands ready to work constructively with all member states to address [topic]. While we maintain that [non-negotiable principle], we remain open to dialogue on [areas of flexibility]. Together, we can [vision for success]. [Country] looks forward to contributing to a resolution that [desired outcome for all parties].

Problem-Analysis Structure

Effective for complex, multi-faceted issues:

[Header Information]

[INTRODUCTION]
The issue of [topic] represents one of the most complex challenges facing the international community. [Country Name], having experienced [relevant experience], understands both the urgency and the complexity of finding sustainable solutions.

[ROOT CAUSES ANALYSIS]
The delegation of [Country Name] identifies three primary factors contributing to [topic]:

First, [root cause 1] has led to [specific consequence]. In our region, this manifests as [specific regional example]. Studies by [credible source] indicate that [relevant statistic].

Second, [root cause 2] exacerbates the situation by [explanation]. [Country] has observed that [specific observation from national experience].

Third, the intersection of [factor 1] and [factor 2] creates [compound problem], which particularly affects [vulnerable group].

[COUNTRY'S STAKE AND ACTIONS]
As a nation that [relevant characteristic], [Country Name] has both a moral obligation and practical interest in addressing [topic]. We have:
- [Past action 1 with specific outcome]
- [Past action 2 with measurable result]
- [Current initiative with projected impact]

Our [specific national program/policy] serves as a model that could be adapted for international use, having achieved [specific success metric].

[COMPREHENSIVE SOLUTIONS]
Based on our analysis and experience, [Country Name] proposes a three-pillar approach:

Pillar I: Immediate Response
- [Urgent action needed]
- [Short-term measure with timeline]
- [Emergency funding/resource allocation]

Pillar II: Sustainable Development
- [Medium-term structural change]
- [Capacity building initiative]
- [Technology transfer or knowledge sharing]

Pillar III: Prevention and Resilience
- [Long-term preventive measure]
- [System for monitoring and evaluation]
- [Framework for continued cooperation]

[IMPLEMENTATION AND COMMITMENT]
[Country Name] pledges [specific commitment] and calls upon [specific actors] to [specific action]. We believe that with coordinated effort and shared responsibility, the international community can [achievable goal within timeframe].

Regional Perspective Structure

Ideal for representing regional powers or bloc positions:

[Header Information]

[REGIONAL CONTEXT]
As a leading member of [regional organization], [Country Name] speaks not only for our national interests but also in consideration of our [number] regional partners. The [region] faces unique challenges regarding [topic], including [regional-specific challenge 1] and [regional-specific challenge 2].

[HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE]
The [region]'s experience with [topic] dates back to [historical event/period]. This history informs our current approach, as we have learned that [lesson learned]. The [specific regional agreement/framework] established in [year] demonstrates our collective commitment to addressing these challenges.

[Country Name] has served as [leadership role] in regional efforts, including [specific initiative]. Our [particular strength/resource] positions us to bridge regional concerns with global solutions.

[REGIONAL CONSENSUS AND VARIATIONS]
The [regional organization] has reached consensus on several key points:
1. [Agreed principle 1]
2. [Agreed principle 2]
3. [Shared goal]

However, we acknowledge diverse approaches within our region. While [subset of countries] prioritizes [approach A], others including [Country Name] emphasize [approach B]. This diversity strengthens our collective response by [benefit of different approaches].

[PROPOSED REGIONAL-GLOBAL FRAMEWORK]
[Country Name] proposes a framework that integrates regional mechanisms with global efforts:

At the regional level:
- Strengthen [existing regional mechanism] to [specific improvement]
- Establish [new regional initiative] modeled on [successful example]
- Enhance coordination through [specific coordination mechanism]

At the global level:
- Recognition of regional variations in [aspect of topic]
- Support for regional organizations to [specific capacity]
- Flexible implementation allowing for [regional adaptation]

[COUNTRY'S BRIDGE ROLE]
[Country Name] is uniquely positioned to facilitate dialogue between [region] and [other regions/global community]. We offer:
- Our experience in [relevant expertise]
- Diplomatic channels through [specific relationships]
- Resources including [specific contribution]

[CONCLUSION]
The path forward requires both regional solidarity and global cooperation. [Country Name] commits to [specific pledge] and encourages all nations to recognize that [core message about regional/global balance]. Together, we can transform regional successes into global solutions.

Research to Writing Workflow

Follow this systematic approach to transform research into a compelling position paper:

1. Initial Research Sweep

  • •Read your committee background guide thoroughly
  • •Identify 3-5 key aspects of each topic
  • •Note questions the committee wants addressed
  • •List potential solution areas mentioned
  • •Identify which countries are mentioned and why

2. Country Deep Dive

  • •Search '[Country] foreign ministry [topic]' for official positions
  • •Find 3 recent UN speeches by your country on related issues
  • •Identify your country's key allies and rivals on this topic
  • •Research domestic policies related to the topic
  • •Note any treaties or agreements your country has signed

3. Position Development

  • •Write your country's position in one sentence
  • •List 3 reasons why your country holds this position
  • •Identify 2-3 non-negotiable principles
  • •Find 2-3 areas where you could compromise
  • •Determine what your country wants from a resolution

4. Solution Crafting

  • •Brainstorm 5 possible solutions
  • •Evaluate each against your country's interests
  • •Research if similar solutions have been tried
  • •Consider funding and implementation mechanisms
  • •Refine to 3 strongest proposals

5. Writing and Refinement

  • •Create outline-solid using chosen structure template
  • •Write first draft without stopping to edit
  • •Add specific examples and statistics
  • •Ensure each paragraph advances your argument
  • •Edit for clarity, conciseness, and diplomatic tone

Diplomatic Language Guide

Master the art of diplomatic writing with these essential techniques:

Expressing Strong Positions

Use firm but respectful language that leaves room for negotiation

Showing Flexibility

Signal willingness to negotiate without abandoning core principles

Critiquing Without Attacking

Address problematic positions or actions diplomatically

Building Consensus Language

Use inclusive language that encourages cooperation

Technical Precision

Use specific UN terminology and avoid casual language

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Learn from frequent mistakes to strengthen your position paper:

The Laundry List

Avoid listing every possible solution without depth or prioritization

The History Essay

Don't spend excessive space on historical background at the expense of current positions and solutions

The Vague Solution

Avoid proposing solutions without implementation details

The First Person Trap

Remember to maintain third person perspective throughout

The Unrealistic Promise

Don't make commitments your country cannot realistically fulfill

Deep Dive

Security Council - Cyber Warfare

Country: United Kingdom | Topic: Cyber Warfare Regulations

Committee: United Nations Security Council Country: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Topic: Establishing International Cyber Warfare Regulations Delegate: [Name] School: [School] [Strong opening establishing relevance and urgency] The United Kingdom views the establishment of international cyber warfare regulations as a critical security imperative for the 21st century. As a nation that has experienced significant cyber attacks, including the 2017 WannaCry ransomware attack that crippled our National Health Service, the UK understands firsthand the devastating potential of cyber warfare to disrupt civilian infrastructure and threaten national security. [Historical context and established credibility] The United Kingdom has been at the forefront of cybersecurity development since establishing the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) in 2016. Our £1.9 billion National Cyber Security Strategy (2016-2021) has strengthened our defensive capabilities while promoting responsible state behavior in cyberspace. The UK has consistently advocated for the application of international law to cyberspace, co-sponsoring UN General Assembly resolutions 73/27 and 74/247, which affirm that international law, including the UN Charter, applies to state activities in cyberspace. [Clear problem identification with specific examples] The absence of clear international regulations has created a dangerous grey zone where state and non-state actors operate with impunity. The NotPetya attack of 2017, which caused over $10 billion in global damages, and the SolarWinds breach of 2020 demonstrate how cyber operations can cause physical damage and economic destruction comparable to conventional warfare. The UK particularly notes that 65% of cyber attacks target civilian infrastructure, including hospitals, power grids, and financial systems, blurring the lines between military and civilian targets. [Comprehensive solution with specific mechanisms] The United Kingdom proposes a three-tiered framework for international cyber warfare regulations: First, we call for the establishment of clear thresholds distinguishing cyber operations that constitute acts of war from those below this threshold. The UK suggests adopting the Tallinn Manual's effects-based approach, where cyber operations causing death, injury, or significant physical damage would trigger the right to self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter. Second, the UK proposes creating an International Cyber Attribution Mechanism under UN auspices, building on our experience with the NCSC's attribution framework. This body would provide technical expertise to investigate significant cyber incidents and establish standardized attribution criteria, addressing the current challenge where only 17% of major cyber attacks are definitively attributed. Third, we advocate for mandatory confidence-building measures, including annual transparency reports on national cyber capabilities, notification procedures for cyber exercises, and establishment of 24/7 communication channels between national cyber emergency response teams. The UK commits to sharing our Cyber Security Information Sharing Partnership model, which has reduced cyber incident impact by 40% among participating organizations. [Acknowledgment of challenges and flexibility] The United Kingdom recognizes the challenges in verification and the dual-use nature of cyber tools. We remain flexible on enforcement mechanisms while insisting on the fundamental principle that states must not knowingly allow their territory to be used for internationally wrongful cyber acts. The UK is prepared to host technical workshops and provide capacity building support to developing nations, recognizing that cyber security is only as strong as the weakest link in our interconnected world. [Forward-looking conclusion with specific commitment] The United Kingdom stands ready to work with all Security Council members to establish a framework that protects civilian infrastructure while preserving states' legitimate security interests. We commit £50 million to support implementation of agreed measures and call for the establishment of a Group of Governmental Experts to draft specific regulatory provisions within six months. The international community must act decisively before a catastrophic cyber attack forces our hand under far worse circumstances.
Key Techniques Used
  • •Opens with national experience to establish credibility and personal stake
  • •Specific budget figures and programs demonstrate serious commitment
  • •References specific incidents with quantified impacts for evidence
  • •Three-tiered solution is clear, specific, and implementable
  • •Acknowledges challenges while maintaining firm position
  • •Cites existing frameworks (Tallinn Manual) showing knowledge depth
  • •Specific financial commitment and timeline show leadership
  • •Balances national security with international cooperation

Human Rights Council - Indigenous Rights

Country: Brazil | Topic: Protecting Indigenous Land Rights

Committee: United Nations Human Rights Council Country: Federative Republic of Brazil Topic: Protecting Indigenous Land Rights in the Context of Development Delegate: [Name] School: [School] [Acknowledge complexity while establishing position] Brazil approaches the protection of indigenous land rights with the unique perspective of a nation hosting the world's largest rainforest and over 300 indigenous peoples comprising 900,000 individuals across 690 recognized territories. The Brazilian delegation acknowledges the inherent tension between development needs and indigenous rights, while firmly maintaining that sustainable development and indigenous protection are not mutually exclusive but rather mutually reinforcing. [Strong legal and constitutional foundation] Brazil's commitment to indigenous rights is enshrined in our 1988 Constitution, which recognizes indigenous peoples' original rights to their traditional lands and obligates the state to demarcate and protect these territories. Articles 231 and 232 guarantee indigenous peoples exclusive usufruct rights to their lands' resources and require their consultation on any activities affecting their territories. Since 1988, Brazil has demarcated 486 indigenous lands covering 13% of our national territory, with 98% of these lands located in the Amazon region. [Honest acknowledgment of challenges] Brazil candidly acknowledges ongoing challenges in implementing these protections. Illegal mining, logging, and land invasions threaten indigenous territories, with satellite data showing a 150% increase in deforestation on indigenous lands between 2018 and 2021. The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately affected indigenous communities, highlighting healthcare access disparities. Furthermore, the 'Marco Temporal' legal thesis, which would limit land claims to territories occupied in 1988, remains a contentious issue that Brazil's Supreme Court is addressing. [Recent positive developments and course correction] Under current leadership, Brazil has reinvigorated indigenous protection efforts. The reestablishment of the Amazon Fund has mobilized $1.3 billion for forest protection and sustainable development. Operation Guardians of the Biome has removed over 15,000 illegal miners from Yanomami territory. Brazil has increased the Indigenous health budget by 48% and launched the Indigenous Emergency Room program, reducing infant mortality in indigenous communities by 12% in one year. [Comprehensive policy proposals] Brazil proposes an integrated approach balancing indigenous rights with sustainable development: First, we advocate for the adoption of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) protocols that go beyond mere consultation. Brazil's experience with the Munduruku Consultation Protocol, developed by indigenous peoples themselves, provides a replicable model. This protocol has successfully prevented harmful projects while enabling community-supported sustainable development initiatives. Second, Brazil proposes establishing an International Fund for Indigenous Economic Alternatives, supporting indigenous-led enterprises in sustainable forest products, ecotourism, and carbon credit programs. Our Bolsa Verde program, providing payments for environmental services to 75,000 families, demonstrates the viability of this approach. Indigenous territories in Brazil store approximately 13.8 billion tons of carbon, making their protection crucial for climate goals. Third, we call for strengthening international monitoring mechanisms through satellite technology and indigenous-led monitoring systems. Brazil offers to share our PRODES and DETER satellite monitoring systems, which provide real-time deforestation alerts. Combined with indigenous territorial monitoring, this technology has reduced illegal incursions by 35% in participating territories. [Regional cooperation and leadership] Brazil emphasizes regional cooperation through the Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization (ACTO) and the Leticia Pact. We propose expanding these frameworks to include binding commitments on indigenous consultation and benefit-sharing from genetic resources. Brazil commits to hosting an international conference on indigenous land rights and climate protection, bringing together governments, indigenous leaders, and development institutions. [Specific commitments and vision] Brazil pledges to complete demarcation of all pending indigenous territories by 2030 and to achieve zero illegal deforestation in indigenous lands by 2028. We commit $500 million annually to indigenous healthcare, education, and territorial protection. The Brazilian delegation invites member states to recognize that protecting indigenous land rights is not an obstacle to development but rather a prerequisite for truly sustainable development that preserves our planet for future generations. The wisdom of our indigenous peoples teaches us that we do not inherit the earth from our ancestors but borrow it from our children. Brazil stands ready to work with all nations to ensure this borrowed treasure is protected through robust indigenous land rights.
Key Techniques Used
  • •Establishes credibility with specific numbers and constitutional framework
  • •Honest about challenges while showing recent improvements
  • •Proposes specific, tested solutions based on national experience
  • •Quantifies environmental benefits to appeal to climate concerns
  • •Regional leadership position while inviting global cooperation
  • •Specific timeline and financial commitments demonstrate seriousness
  • •Ends with indigenous wisdom, respecting their voice and perspective
  • •Balances development needs with rights protection throughout

ECOSOC - Sustainable Development

Country: Kenya | Topic: Technology Transfer for SDGs

Committee: United Nations Economic and Social Council Country: Republic of Kenya Topic: Technology Transfer for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals Delegate: [Name] School: [School] [Position as regional tech leader] Kenya stands before this distinguished body as Africa's recognized technology hub and a testament to how developing nations can leapfrog traditional development stages through strategic technology adoption. As the birthplace of M-Pesa, the world's leading mobile money platform serving 51 million users across seven countries, Kenya understands both the transformative potential of technology transfer and the conditions necessary for its success. [Concrete evidence of tech transformation] Kenya's journey from technology recipient to regional innovator illustrates the multiplier effect of effective technology transfer. Our ICT sector now contributes 8.4% to GDP, up from 0.9% in 2000. The Silicon Savannah has attracted $1.5 billion in tech investments over the past five years, creating 300,000 direct jobs. M-Pesa alone has lifted 2% of Kenyan households out of extreme poverty, according to MIT studies. Furthermore, our e-governance platform has reduced business registration time from 30 days to 24 hours, demonstrating technology's role in achieving SDG 16 (effective institutions). [Current initiatives showing leadership] Kenya is actively facilitating South-South technology cooperation. Our Konza Technopolis masterplan includes capacity building programs for 10 African nations. The Kenya Climate Innovation Center has supported 280 clean technology enterprises, reducing 2.5 million tons of CO2 emissions. Our Universal Health Coverage program, leveraging biometric technology and mobile platforms, has registered 19 million Kenyans, advancing SDG 3. These initiatives demonstrate that developing nations can be technology innovators, not merely recipients. [Clear problem diagnosis] Despite progress, Kenya recognizes systemic barriers to technology transfer that prevent achieving the SDGs by 2030. Intellectual property restrictions limit access to essential technologies, with climate adaptation technologies costing developing nations $140-175 billion annually by 2030. The digital divide persists, with 37% of the global population lacking internet access. Technology transfer often fails due to inadequate local capacity building, inappropriate technology selection, and absence of enabling regulatory frameworks. Current mechanisms under UNFCCC Article 4.5 and TRIPS Agreement flexibilities remain underutilized. [Detailed multi-stakeholder solutions] Kenya proposes a comprehensive Technology Transfer Acceleration Framework: First, establish Regional Technology Adaptation Centers building on Kenya's Climate Innovation Center model. These centers would modify technologies for local contexts, provide training, and facilitate South-South cooperation. Kenya offers to host the African center and share our experience in adapting Israeli agricultural technology for smallholder farmers, which increased yields by 40%. Second, create a Global Technology Pool for SDG-critical technologies, similar to the Medicines Patent Pool but expanded to include renewable energy, water purification, and agricultural technologies. Patent holders would receive compensation through a UN-administered fund, while developing nations gain affordable access. Kenya's pharmaceutical industry demonstrates this model's viability, having reduced ARV costs by 90% through generic production. Third, implement Technology Transfer Performance Bonds where technology providers commit to genuine capacity building, not merely equipment delivery. Success metrics would include local job creation, knowledge retention, and indigenous innovation capacity. Kenya's partnership with China on the Standard Gauge Railway, which trained 5,000 local technicians, exemplifies effective capacity transfer. Fourth, establish a Blockchain-based Technology Transfer Registry ensuring transparency, preventing duplicate efforts, and tracking impact. Kenya's adoption of blockchain for land registries, reducing property fraud by 30%, demonstrates this technology's potential for governance applications. [Financial mechanisms and commitments] Kenya proposes financing through a 0.1% levy on international technology licensing fees, potentially generating $5 billion annually for the Technology Transfer Fund. We commit to contributing 0.5% of our ICT sector revenues to support regional technology adaptation. Additionally, Kenya offers 1,000 annual scholarships for technology training at our universities and innovation centers. [Forward-looking conclusion with African wisdom] The Kenyan delegation believes technology transfer is not charity but investment in our collective future. As our Swahili proverb states, "Haba na haba, hujaza kibaba" - little by little fills the measure. Through systematic technology transfer coupled with local innovation, we can achieve the SDGs. Kenya stands ready to bridge the technology divide, transforming Africa from a technology consumer to a global innovation partner. The time for half-measures has passed; bold action on technology transfer will determine whether we meet our 2030 commitments or explain our failure to future generations.
Key Techniques Used
  • •Positions Kenya as success story and regional leader, not aid recipient
  • •Specific examples (M-Pesa) that international audience recognizes
  • •Quantifies everything - GDP contribution, jobs created, poverty reduced
  • •Shows Kenya as solution provider, not just problem identifier
  • •Addresses IP concerns with creative solutions
  • •Detailed implementation mechanisms show serious thought
  • •Financial commitment despite being developing nation shows leadership
  • •Uses African proverb to maintain cultural authenticity
  • •Challenges traditional donor-recipient dynamic throughout

Reading Between the Lines

Understand what position papers reveal about committee dynamics:

Identifying Natural Allies

Countries with similar solutions or shared concerns become natural partners. Look for complementary strengths.

Spotting Compromise Areas

When multiple papers propose variations of similar solutions, these become fertile ground for consensus building.

Finding Your Niche

If many papers focus on one aspect, specialize in an underaddressed area to become indispensable to comprehensive solutions.

Anticipating Opposition

Papers revealing fundamental disagreements help you prepare counter-arguments and compromise positions.

Strategic Positioning

Use your position paper to set up successful committee performance:

The Bridge Builder

Position your country as natural mediator between opposing camps by acknowledging both perspectives

The Technical Expert

Demonstrate deep expertise in specific aspects to become the go-to delegation for technical details

The Regional Leader

Speak for regional interests while showing flexibility on global implementation

The Innovative Thinker

Propose creative solutions others haven't considered to stand out from day one

Award-Winning Elements

What distinguishes exceptional position papers:

Depth of Research

  • •Multiple types of sources cited appropriately
  • •Understanding of nuanced country positions
  • •Awareness of previous attempts and why they failed
  • •Integration of current events and recent developments

Quality of Analysis

  • •Clear cause-and-effect reasoning
  • •Acknowledgment of complexity without losing clarity
  • •Balance between idealism and pragmatism
  • •Original insights or connections

Solution Innovation

  • •Specific, implementable proposals
  • •Clear funding and oversight mechanisms
  • •Consideration of potential obstacles
  • •Building on existing frameworks creatively

Writing Excellence

  • •Clear, concise prose without jargon
  • •Logical flow between paragraphs
  • •Appropriate diplomatic tone throughout
  • •Error-free grammar and formatting

FAQ

How do I write a position paper for a country whose position I disagree with?

Focus on understanding why the country holds its position based on national interests, history, and constraints. You're representing their government's view, not your personal opinion. Research their official statements and find aspects you can authentically argue. Remember, even controversial positions usually have some logical basis from that country's perspective.

What if I can't find my country's specific position on the topic?

Look for positions on related issues, regional bloc stances, or similar countries' positions. Consider your country's general foreign policy principles, economic interests, and security concerns. Review voting records on related resolutions. When truly uncertain, take a moderate position that aligns with your country's known interests and values.

How much of my position paper should be background vs. solutions?

Aim for roughly 30% background/context, 70% current position and solutions. Background should directly support your argument, not just fill space. Every historical reference or statistic should build toward your proposed solutions. Chairs want to see your critical thinking and problem-solving, not just research ability.

Should I cite sources in my speeches during committee?

While you don't need formal citations during speeches, referencing credible sources strengthens your arguments. Say things like 'According to the World Bank...' or 'As documented in Security Council Resolution 2331...' This shows your positions are research-based, not just opinion.

Can I propose solutions that require changing international law?

Yes, but acknowledge the difficulty and propose realistic pathways. Show you understand the process (treaty negotiations, ratification requirements, etc.) and timeline. Often it's better to work within existing frameworks creatively than propose entirely new international law.

How do I handle classified or sensitive information about my country?

Stick to publicly available information from credible sources. If real positions are classified, infer from public statements, voting records, and known interests. Never invent classified information or claim insider knowledge you don't have.

What if my country recently changed its position on the topic?

Acknowledge the evolution and explain it as responding to new circumstances or leadership. Show continuity where possible while explaining new directions. This actually demonstrates sophisticated understanding of how foreign policy develops.

How technical should my solutions be?

Include enough detail to show feasibility but not so much that it becomes unreadable. A good rule: explain the what, why, and how, but leave highly technical implementation details for working papers. Your position paper should be understandable to delegates from all backgrounds.

Continue learning

Explore related MUN guides to deepen your skills.

Beginner's Guide to MUN

The complete foundation — research, procedure, documents, and strategy

Opening Speeches

Turn your position paper into powerful opening statements

Resolutions

Transform position paper proposals into operative clauses

Country Research

193+ country profiles with foreign policy positions and voting records

Keep exploring

Opening Speeches GuideResolutions GuideBeginner's Guide to MUN