For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt.
Skip to main content
New

Travel Advisory Level 1 — Exercise Normal Precautions

Updated May 23, 2026

Travel Advisory Level 1 is the lowest of four U.S. State Department risk ratings, instructing travelers to exercise normal precautions in destinations presenting no country-specific elevated threat.

The U.S. Department of State's four-tier Travel Advisory system, in which Travel Advisory Level 1 — Exercise Normal Precautions constitutes the lowest threshold, was introduced on 10 January 2018 by the Bureau of Consular Affairs to replace the earlier patchwork of Travel Warnings and Travel Alerts. The system is administered under the statutory authority of the Secretary of State to protect U.S. citizens abroad, derived from 22 U.S.C. § 2671 (emergency assistance to nationals) and the consular functions enumerated in Article 5 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR). Level 1 signals that a destination presents the baseline risk profile inherent to any international travel and that no country-specific elevated threat — whether from crime, terrorism, civil unrest, health, natural disaster, kidnapping, or wrongful detention — currently warrants heightened caution. Every country receives an advisory level, and the Bureau publishes the full taxonomy at travel.state.gov, with each entry timestamped, indexed by ISO country code, and accompanied by an explanatory narrative.

The procedural mechanics begin within the relevant regional bureau and the receiving U.S. embassy or consulate, which submit a Consular Information Program (CIP) input through the Bureau of Consular Affairs' Office of Overseas Citizens Services (CA/OCS). Country desks coordinate with the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, the Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR), and where relevant the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC). Assignment of Level 1 requires that none of the eight standardized risk indicators — designated by the letters C (Crime), T (Terrorism), U (Civil Unrest), H (Health), N (Natural Disaster), E (Time-limited Event), K (Kidnapping or Hostage-taking), D (Wrongful Detention), and O (Other) — meet the threshold for an elevated rating. Reviews occur at minimum every six months for Level 1 and Level 2 destinations, and every ninety days for Levels 3 and 4, with off-cycle updates triggered by intervening events.

A Level 1 advisory does not mean an absence of risk; the explanatory text routinely reminds travelers to monitor local conditions, enroll in the Smart Traveler Enrollment Program (STEP), maintain situational awareness, and consult country-specific information pages covering entry requirements, dual nationality, customs regulations, and local laws. Level 1 advisories may nonetheless contain regional carve-outs flagged as "Do Not Travel" or "Reconsider Travel" zones for particular provinces or border areas — a construction sometimes called a mixed advisory. The system also accommodates time-limited supplements, such as advisories tied to major sporting events, elections, or hurricane season, which can temporarily elevate the rating without altering the underlying country assessment.

In recent practice, countries assigned Level 1 have included Iceland, Japan, Switzerland, Singapore, Canada, Australia, and most of the smaller Pacific and Caribbean states absent acute crises. The April 2024 update to Israel's advisory raised it well above Level 1 following the regional escalation that began on 7 October 2023; conversely, Japan has held Level 1 status continuously, with the Tokyo embassy under successive ambassadors issuing only event-specific health or weather supplements. The United Kingdom oscillated between Level 1 and Level 2 around the 2017 Manchester and London Bridge attacks. Decisions are formally cleared by the Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs, with significant changes briefed to the Under Secretary for Management and, when politically sensitive, coordinated with the relevant chief of mission and the National Security Council staff.

Level 1 must be distinguished from the United Kingdom Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) travel advice, the Canadian Global Affairs Travel Advice and Advisories, the Australian Smartraveller system, and the French Conseils aux Voyageurs maintained by the Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs — each of which uses its own gradation and may reach divergent conclusions for the same destination. It is also distinct from a Worldwide Caution, a global notice issued under separate authority addressing transnational threats to U.S. citizens irrespective of country, and from a Travel Health Notice, which is issued by the CDC under 42 C.F.R. Part 71 and concerns disease-specific risk rather than the composite security picture.

Controversies have attached principally to the timing and political optics of advisory changes. Host governments frequently protest elevations because of measurable downstream effects on tourism receipts, insurance premiums, and corporate duty-of-care decisions; Mexico's Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores has repeatedly objected to state-by-state ratings under the system. Conversely, watchdogs and congressional staff have questioned whether Level 1 ratings for jurisdictions with documented wrongful-detention risk — a category formally added with the introduction of the "D" indicator in July 2022 following the cases of Brittney Griner and Paul Whelan in the Russian Federation — adequately warn travelers. The 2020–2022 COVID-19 period saw the Department issue a blanket Level 4 advisory on 19 March 2020, the broadest single use of the system to date.

For the working practitioner, Level 1 functions as the operating baseline against which deviations carry diplomatic, commercial, and legal weight. Corporate security officers calibrate duty-of-care obligations against the advisory level; insurers reference it in war-risk and kidnap-and-ransom policies; universities use it to authorize study-abroad programs; and federal agencies tie official travel approval thresholds to the rating under the Foreign Affairs Manual (7 FAM 050). Diplomats posted abroad should recognize that the advisory level for their country of accreditation is a continuous signal of the bilateral risk environment as Washington perceives it — a perception that can itself become an instrument of, or an irritant within, the diplomatic relationship.

Example

In its January 2024 update, the U.S. State Department maintained Iceland at Travel Advisory Level 1 despite the Reykjanes Peninsula volcanic eruptions, attaching only a localized natural-hazard supplement.

Frequently asked questions

A Level 1 assignment requires that none of the indicator thresholds be met at the country-wide level. Sub-national zones within a Level 1 country may nonetheless carry elevated indicators, producing a 'mixed advisory' that travelers must read in full rather than relying on the headline tier.
Talk to founder