A RACI matrix (sometimes called a responsibility assignment matrix or RAM) is a grid that maps tasks or deliverables against the people or roles involved in a project. Each cell is filled with one or more letters from the acronym:
- R – Responsible: the person or team that actually performs the work.
- A – Accountable: the single individual ultimately answerable for the outcome and who signs off on completion. Best practice is exactly one "A" per task.
- C – Consulted: subject-matter experts whose input is sought before a decision or action; two-way communication.
- I – Informed: stakeholders kept up to date on progress or decisions; one-way communication.
The tool is widely used in management consulting, government program design, and large NGO or intergovernmental secretariats to prevent the two most common coordination failures: duplicated effort and unclaimed tasks. For junior researchers and policy teams, a RACI matrix is useful when drafting deliverables across multiple desks—for example, a think-tank report involving a lead author, a peer reviewer, a communications team, and a funder.
Variants have proliferated. RASCI adds a "Support" role for those who assist the Responsible party. RACI-VS adds Verifier and Signatory. DACI swaps in Driver, Approver, Contributor, and Informed and is common in technology firms for decision-making rather than execution. CAIRO or RACIO adds "Out of the loop" to explicitly exclude parties.
Common pitfalls include assigning multiple "Accountable" roles (which dilutes ownership), over-consulting (which slows decisions), and treating the matrix as a one-time artifact rather than a living document updated as scope shifts. The Project Management Institute's PMBOK Guide lists responsibility assignment matrices among standard resource management tools, though it does not prescribe RACI specifically.
Example
When the UN Department of Global Communications coordinates a flagship campaign such as the 2023 SDG Summit rollout, a RACI-style matrix typically designates one bureau as Accountable for messaging sign-off while regional information centres are Consulted.
Frequently asked questions
No. The standard rule is exactly one Accountable party per task to ensure clear ownership; multiple Responsibles are fine, but multiple Accountables dilute authority and create confusion when sign-off is needed.
Keep learning