For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt.
Skip to main content
New

HCoC

Updated May 23, 2026

The Hague Code of Conduct against Ballistic Missile Proliferation, a politically binding 2002 transparency arrangement on ballistic missiles capable of delivering WMD.

The Hague Code of Conduct against Ballistic Missile Proliferation is a politically (not legally) binding transparency and confidence-building instrument addressing the spread of ballistic missiles capable of delivering weapons of mass destruction. It was adopted in The Hague on 25 November 2002, originally as the International Code of Conduct (ICOC), and has since grown to over 140 subscribing states.

Subscribing states commit to a set of general principles and modest practical measures, including:

  • Restraint in the development, testing, and deployment of ballistic missiles capable of delivering WMD.
  • Pre-launch notifications (PLNs) for ballistic missile and space-launch vehicle launches and test flights.
  • Annual declarations (ADs) outlining national ballistic missile and space-launch policies, including the number and class of launches conducted in the previous year.

The HCoC explicitly recognises that states should not be excluded from the peaceful uses of outer space, but stresses that space-launch programmes should not be used to conceal ballistic missile development. It complements, rather than replaces, the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), which is a supply-side export-control arrangement; the HCoC instead focuses on the demand side and on transparency among possessor and non-possessor states alike.

The Code has no verification mechanism and no enforcement body. The Austrian Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs serves as the Immediate Central Contact (Executive Secretariat), circulating notifications and declarations among subscribing states. Annual Regular Meetings are held in Vienna.

Several states of proliferation concern remain outside the Code, notably China, India (which subscribed in 2016), Iran, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia—though India's accession marked a significant expansion. Critics note that compliance with PLNs and ADs has been uneven, and that the HCoC's voluntary character limits its effect on actual missile programmes. Supporters argue it remains the only multilateral normative instrument specifically addressing ballistic missile proliferation.

Example

In October 2016, India formally subscribed to the HCoC, becoming its 138th subscribing state and the first nuclear-armed country in South Asia to join.

Frequently asked questions

No. It is a politically binding code with no treaty status, no verification regime, and no sanctions for non-compliance.
Talk to founder