For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt.
Skip to main content
New

G77 plus China Coordination

Updated May 23, 2026

G77 plus China coordination is the practice by which 134 developing states and China align negotiating positions inside UN bodies through a rotating chair and thematic working groups.

The Group of 77 plus China is the largest intergovernmental coalition of developing states operating within the United Nations system, established on 15 June 1964 by the "Joint Declaration of the Seventy-Seven Developing Countries" issued at the close of the first session of the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD I) in Geneva. The founding signatories numbered 77; the membership has since expanded to 134 states, though the original name was retained for historical continuity. China is not a formal member but has associated itself with the Group's positions since the early 1990s, contributing politically and financially while preserving its independent vote — hence the formulation "G77 and China" used in UN documents. The Group has no charter, no secretariat treaty, and no binding decision rules; its coordination rests on consensus practice, a Ministerial Declaration adopted annually at the opening of the UN General Assembly, and the institutional memory carried by the chair country's permanent mission.

Coordination is organized around a rotating annual chairmanship that alternates among the three regional caucuses — African Group, Asia-Pacific Group, and the Group of Latin American and Caribbean States (GRULAC). The chair, always a head of state or government at the political level and an ambassador at the operational level, hosts the Group's office inside its UN mission in New York and assumes responsibility for convening meetings, drafting common positions, and speaking on behalf of the Group in plenary. Chapters exist in Geneva (UNCTAD, WTO, Human Rights Council), Nairobi (UNEP, UN-Habitat), Vienna (UNIDO, IAEA), Rome (FAO, IFAD, WFP), Paris (UNESCO), and Washington (the Group of 24 at the IMF and World Bank, which is the G77's financial counterpart). Each chapter elects its own chair and coordinates issues falling within that duty station's competence.

The procedural mechanics inside the General Assembly follow a predictable rhythm. Before each Main Committee takes up an agenda item, the G77 chair convenes an experts' meeting at which delegates table draft language; a facilitator — usually a mid-ranking diplomat from a member state with topical expertise — is appointed to consolidate text. The resulting common position is then defended in informal negotiations with the European Union, JUSCANZ (Japan, the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand), and other groupings. Where the Group cannot reach internal consensus, individual members retain the right to dissociate, a procedure used sparingly because it weakens collective leverage. Funding for travel and the chair's operational costs comes from voluntary contributions, with China and the larger middle-income members carrying a disproportionate share.

Recent chairmanships illustrate the Group's geographic rotation: Pakistan (2022), Cuba (2023), Uganda (2024), and Iraq (2025). The Havana Summit of September 2023, hosted by Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel and attended by UN Secretary-General António Guterres, produced a declaration on "Current Development Challenges: The Role of Science, Technology and Innovation" that became the reference document for G77 interventions during the SDG Summit and the subsequent Summit of the Future in September 2024. The Group has been central to negotiations on climate finance under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, particularly the operationalization of the Loss and Damage Fund agreed at COP27 in Sharm el-Sheikh (2022) and capitalized at COP28 in Dubai (2023), and to the UN Tax Convention process advanced under General Assembly resolution 78/230 of December 2023.

The G77 plus China should be distinguished from the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), with which it overlaps substantially in membership but not in mandate: NAM addresses political and security questions outside formal UN structures, while the G77 confines itself to economic, social, environmental, and development matters inside the UN system. It is likewise distinct from the BRICS grouping, which is a self-selected club of major emerging economies operating outside the UN, and from the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and the Least Developed Countries (LDC) Group, both of which are sub-coalitions whose members also belong to the G77 but caucus separately on issues where their interests diverge from the broader bloc — most visibly on climate ambition and graduation thresholds.

The Group's principal internal tension is heterogeneity. Saudi Arabia, Singapore, and Qatar share membership with Haiti, Chad, and Tuvalu, producing recurring fractures on fossil fuel phase-out language, common-but-differentiated-responsibilities (CBDR) interpretation, and trade liberalization. Critics — including several European missions and a number of academic observers — argue the consensus rule produces lowest-common-denominator positions that obscure the divergent interests of petrostates, emerging industrial powers, and climate-vulnerable states. Defenders counter that the Group remains the only forum where 80 percent of humanity speaks with one voice on systemic issues such as sovereign debt restructuring, international tax cooperation, and reform of the international financial architecture, as articulated in the Secretary-General's "Our Common Agenda" report and the Pact for the Future adopted in September 2024.

For the working diplomat, mastery of G77 coordination is indispensable in any UN portfolio touching development, finance, environment, or human rights. Drafting that ignores the Group's red lines — sovereignty, CBDR, the right to development, non-conditionality of assistance — will not survive committee. Conversely, securing the chair's endorsement or persuading a regional caucus to soften a position can determine whether a resolution passes by consensus or forces a recorded vote. Desk officers should track the chair's calendar, read the annual Ministerial Declaration as a roadmap of bloc priorities for the coming session, and cultivate working relationships with the facilitators who carry the technical pen on each negotiating file.

Example

Cuba, as G77 chair in 2023, convened the Havana Summit on 15–16 September 2023, where 134 developing states adopted a joint declaration on science and technology that framed the bloc's positions at the subsequent SDG Summit in New York.

Frequently asked questions

China has positioned itself since the early 1990s as a developing country that supports the G77 politically without subordinating its independent foreign policy to bloc discipline. The 'plus China' formulation, adopted in UN documents from 1994 onward, allows Beijing to associate with Group positions, co-sponsor resolutions, and contribute financially while retaining the right to vote and speak separately when its interests diverge.
Talk to founder