A closing argument (also called summation or closing statement) is the structured final address a party gives after evidence has been presented but before a verdict or decision is rendered. Unlike an opening statement, which previews what a party intends to prove, the closing argument is explicitly persuasive: it weaves the record of testimony, exhibits, and stipulations into a coherent narrative and asks the trier of fact to draw specific inferences.
In common-law criminal and civil trials, closings typically follow a fixed sequence. The party bearing the burden of proof (the prosecution or plaintiff) generally argues first, the defense responds, and in many U.S. jurisdictions the prosecution or plaintiff receives a rebuttal because it carries the burden. Judges instruct juries that closing arguments are not evidence, only advocacy.
Permissible content is bounded by professional conduct rules and case law. Counsel may argue reasonable inferences from admitted evidence, comment on witness credibility, and discuss the law as given in jury instructions. Counsel generally may not vouch personally for witnesses, reference excluded evidence, appeal to passion or prejudice, or misstate the law. In the United States, Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78 (1935), remains a touchstone for limits on prosecutorial summation, and Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965), bars comment on a defendant's silence.
Beyond the courtroom, the term is borrowed in adjacent professional settings:
- Arbitration and administrative hearings, where post-hearing briefs often substitute for or supplement oral closings.
- Model UN and competitive debate, where a closing speech or "rebuttal" performs an analogous synthesizing function.
- Legislative and inquiry proceedings, where counsel assisting a commission may deliver summations before findings issue.
Effective closings typically restate the burden of proof, organize evidence around contested elements, preempt the opponent's strongest points, and conclude with a concrete request for relief or verdict.
Example
In the 1995 *People v. Simpson* trial, defense attorney Johnnie Cochran's closing argument famously urged jurors, "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit," referring to the glove evidence.
Frequently asked questions
No. Judges routinely instruct juries that statements by counsel during closing are argument, not evidence; jurors must decide the case on testimony and exhibits admitted during trial.
Keep learning