Anti-corruption compliance refers to the internal programs organizations build to ensure they do not engage in, facilitate, or benefit from bribery, kickbacks, embezzlement, or improper payments to public officials or private counterparties. For multinational companies, NGOs, and development agencies, a credible program is both a legal obligation and a reputational necessity.
The field is anchored in several extraterritorial statutes and instruments. The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) of 1977 prohibits payments to foreign officials to obtain or retain business and imposes books-and-records requirements on issuers. The UK Bribery Act 2010 is broader, criminalizing commercial bribery and creating a corporate offense of "failing to prevent bribery" — with an affirmative defense for organizations that maintain "adequate procedures." At the multilateral level, the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention (1997) and the UN Convention against Corruption (UNCAC, 2003) commit states parties to criminalize foreign bribery and cooperate on enforcement.
A typical program includes:
- Risk assessment keyed to country, sector, and transaction type (often referencing Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index).
- Written policies covering gifts, hospitality, facilitation payments, political contributions, and charitable donations.
- Third-party due diligence on agents, distributors, and joint-venture partners, who are a leading source of liability.
- Training and certifications for employees in higher-risk roles.
- Internal controls and audit, whistleblower channels, and documented investigation procedures.
- Discipline and remediation when violations are found.
Enforcement guidance from the U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division's "Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs" and the UK Ministry of Justice's guidance on the Bribery Act emphasize that programs must be well-designed, adequately resourced, and demonstrably working in practice — not "paper" programs. Penalties for failures can reach billions of dollars, as seen in resolutions involving Siemens (2008), Odebrecht (2016), Airbus (2020), and Glencore (2022).
For IR researchers, compliance regimes are also instruments of foreign policy, projecting domestic legal standards into global commercial conduct.
Example
In January 2020, Airbus SE entered a coordinated $3.9 billion global settlement with U.S., UK, and French authorities over FCPA, Bribery Act, and Sapin II violations, and committed to overhaul its anti-corruption compliance program under deferred prosecution agreements.
Frequently asked questions
Yes. It reaches foreign issuers listed on U.S. exchanges and any person, regardless of nationality, who takes a corrupt act in furtherance of a bribe while in U.S. territory.
Keep learning