For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt.
Skip to main content
Research//Security Council

DRC — Security Council Background Guide (2025)

Comprehensive MUN background guide on the Democratic Republic of Congo in the 2025 Security Council session, covering key issues, history, and policy positions.

Updated

Security Council Background Guide: The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)

Conference Year: 2025


Topic Background

The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) has been a focal point of regional instability and humanitarian crises for over two decades. Rich in natural resources yet plagued by armed conflict, political instability, and weak governance, the DRC remains one of the most complex and challenging issues before the United Nations Security Council (UNSC).

Historically, the DRC’s conflict roots trace back to the aftermath of the Rwandan genocide in 1994, which triggered massive refugee flows and armed groups crossing into eastern Congo. The First and Second Congo Wars (1996–1997 and 1998–2003) involved multiple neighboring states and armed factions, resulting in millions of deaths and widespread human rights abuses. Despite the formal end of large-scale conflict, eastern DRC continues to experience violence fueled by ethnic tensions, competition over mineral wealth, and the presence of numerous armed groups, including the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), and various Mai-Mai militias.

The ongoing instability has severe humanitarian consequences, with millions displaced and frequent reports of sexual violence and exploitation. Political challenges persist, including delayed elections, governance deficits, and corruption. The DRC’s strategic importance—due to its size, resources, and location—means that its stability affects broader Central African security dynamics.

The issue remains on the UNSC agenda in 2025 due to escalating violence in the eastern provinces (North Kivu, South Kivu, Ituri), the slow progress of security sector reform, and the need to support the DRC government in consolidating peace and stability. The presence of the United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO) continues to be debated within the Council and by Congolese society, with calls for recalibration or withdrawal. Additionally, regional tensions, including cross-border armed incursions and illicit resource exploitation, have intensified, requiring coordinated international action.


Key Actors

States:

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo: The primary state concerned, grappling with internal security, governance, and development challenges.
  • Rwanda and Uganda: Neighboring countries historically involved in DRC conflicts, accused of supporting armed groups, but also key partners in regional stabilization efforts.
  • Burundi and Tanzania: Part of the East African regional framework, contributing to peacekeeping and diplomatic initiatives.
  • United States and European Union member states (France, Belgium, UK): Active in diplomatic efforts, humanitarian aid, and supporting MONUSCO mandates.
  • China: Increasingly involved through investments and peacekeeping contributions, with a focus on resource access and regional stability.
  • Russia: Emerging actor with strategic interests, often advocating for state sovereignty and non-intervention in UNSC debates.

International Organizations:

  • United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO): The largest UN peacekeeping mission, tasked with protecting civilians, supporting stabilization, and facilitating disarmament.
  • African Union (AU): Engaged in regional diplomatic efforts and peacebuilding initiatives.
  • International Conference on the Great Lakes Region (ICGLR): A regional body coordinating efforts to address cross-border security and development.
  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA): Leading humanitarian response and protection efforts.

Bloc Positions

1. Western Powers (United States, United Kingdom, France, Belgium, EU):
This bloc generally supports robust UN engagement, including maintaining or adjusting MONUSCO’s mandate to better protect civilians and support disarmament. They emphasize human rights, accountability for armed groups, and support for democratic governance. They often push for sanctions against individuals or entities perpetuating conflict and advocate for increased humanitarian assistance.

2. African States and Regional Actors (South Africa, Kenya, Tanzania, AU, ICGLR):
Regional actors prioritize African-led solutions and emphasize sovereignty and non-interference. They often advocate for gradual drawdown or transformation of MONUSCO into a more support-oriented mission. They focus on regional cooperation frameworks to address cross-border threats and support the DRC’s government-led stabilization efforts. They are sensitive to local perceptions of UN peacekeepers and stress the importance of political dialogue.

3. BRICS and Emerging Powers (China, Russia, India, Brazil):
This bloc tends to emphasize respect for state sovereignty and non-intervention. They are cautious about imposing sanctions or measures that could undermine the DRC government. China and Russia often advocate for peacekeeping mandates that prioritize stability over regime change and stress economic development and resource management. They support engagement that balances security with respect for national ownership.

4. Human Rights and Civil Society Advocates (Norway, Sweden, Canada):
Though smaller in Security Council membership, these countries emphasize protection of civilians, accountability for sexual and gender-based violence, and support for civil society. They push for stronger mandates on human rights monitoring and integration of gender perspectives in peacekeeping and political processes.


Past UN Action

  • Resolution 1925 (2010): Established MONUSCO by merging MONUC with a stabilization force, focusing on protection of civilians and stabilization.
  • Resolution 2053 (2012): Extended MONUSCO’s mandate with emphasis on supporting the electoral process.
  • Resolution 2147 (2014): Established the Force Intervention Brigade with an offensive mandate against armed groups.
  • Resolution 2556 (2020): Extended MONUSCO’s mandate with a focus on protecting civilians and facilitating the 2018 elections.
  • Resolution 2677 (2023): Latest mandate renewal focusing on adapting MONUSCO’s role towards enabling the DRC’s security forces and promoting political dialogue.

In addition to resolutions, the Secretary-General’s periodic reports on the DRC provide comprehensive updates on security, humanitarian, and political developments, informing Council deliberations.


Questions a Resolution Should Answer

  1. How should MONUSCO’s mandate be adapted to balance protection of civilians with support for the DRC’s security sector reform and sovereignty concerns?
  2. What measures should the Security Council endorse to enhance accountability for armed groups and prevent their financing, including through illicit resource exploitation?
  3. How can the Council support regional cooperation frameworks like the ICGLR and the AU to address cross-border security challenges?
  4. What role should the Security Council play in supporting the DRC’s upcoming electoral processes and political reconciliation efforts?
  5. How can the UN better integrate gender perspectives and address sexual and gender-based violence in its peacekeeping and humanitarian mandates?
  6. What steps should be taken to improve humanitarian access and protect displaced populations within the DRC?
  7. How might the Security Council engage with the DRC government and regional partners to ensure sustainable peace and development beyond peacekeeping?

Further Reading

  • UN Documents:
    Official Security Council resolutions, Secretary-General reports on MONUSCO, and briefings on the DRC provide authoritative insights into the UN’s evolving approach and mandate details.

  • Think-Tank Reports:
    Analyses from institutions such as the International Crisis Group, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and the African Center for Strategic Studies offer in-depth assessments of conflict dynamics, peacekeeping effectiveness, and policy recommendations.

  • News Outlets:
    Reputable international and regional media sources, including Reuters, Al Jazeera, and African news agencies, provide timely updates on security incidents, political developments, and humanitarian conditions on the ground.


This background guide aims to equip delegates with a nuanced understanding of the DRC’s complex challenges and the Security Council’s critical role in fostering peace, security, and development in the region.

Want deeper research?

Get AI-powered research with live sources, follow-up questions, and export to position papers.