---
title: "Economic Journey: Planning to 1991 Reforms (GS-1)"
description: "India's economy moved from Nehruvian planning and the licence-permit raj to 1991 liberalization. Trace the Industrial Policy Resolutions and Mahalanobis model"
url: "https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/lessons/upsc-post-independence-economic-journey-planning-the-licence-raj-1991-reforms"
---

[New](https://modeldiplomat.com/)

Economic journey: planning, the licence raj & 1991 reforms

Read 1 of 4

1/80 XP so far this lesson

Lesson 18 min 20 XP

# Economic journey: planning, the licence raj & 1991 reforms

India's economic arc from Nehruvian planning and the licence-permit raj to the 1991 liberalization, tracing the Industrial Policy Resolutions, Mahalanobis model and structural refo

## The architecture of planned development

Independent India adopted a 'mixed economy' in which the state commanded the heights while a regulated private sector survived at the margins. The **Industrial Policy Resolution of 6 April 1948** first reserved arms, atomic energy and railways exclusively for the state and earmarked six basic industries for new public investment. The **Directive Principles**, especially Articles 38, 39 and 41, supplied the constitutional mandate for a welfare-oriented, redistributive economy.

The institutional engine was the **Planning Commission**, established by a Cabinet Resolution on 15 March 1950 (not a constitutional or statutory body), with the Prime Minister as ex-officio chairman. The **First Five Year Plan (1951–56)** followed the Harrod–Domar growth model and prioritised agriculture and irrigation in the wake of Partition dislocation and the 1950–51 food crisis; it exceeded its modest 2.1% target, achieving 3.6% growth.

## The Mahalanobis model and heavy industry

The **Second Five Year Plan (1956–61)** marked the decisive turn. Drafted around the **Mahalanobis two-sector and four-sector models** by statistician P.C. Mahalanobis, it privileged capital-goods and heavy industry on the logic that domestic machine-building capacity was the precondition for long-run growth. The **Industrial Policy Resolution of 30 April 1956**—often called the 'economic constitution' of the era—divided industry into three schedules: Schedule A (17 industries) exclusively for the state, Schedule B (12 industries) where the state would progressively expand, and Schedule C left to the private sector but subject to licensing. This Resolution gave statutory teeth to the 'socialistic pattern of society' adopted by the Congress at its **Avadi session (1955)**.

The public-sector behemoths of this era—the steel plants at Bhilai (Soviet aid), Rourkela (West German) and Durgapur (British), plus Bharat Heavy Electricals and Hindustan Machine Tools—were the temples of Nehru's industrial vision.

## The licence–permit–quota raj

The legal scaffolding of control was the **Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951**, which required a licence for establishing, expanding or relocating most industrial units. Layered on top were the **Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), 1973**, which capped foreign equity at 40% and forced firms such as IBM and Coca-Cola to exit in 1977, and the **Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (MRTP) Act, 1969**, which subjected large 'houses' to additional clearances. Import substitution behind high tariffs, canalised imports through the State Trading Corporation, and bank nationalisation (14 banks in July 1969; six more in 1980) completed the edifice.

The cumulative result was the so-called **'Hindu rate of growth'**—a phrase coined by economist Raj Krishna for the roughly 3.5% average annual GDP growth of 1950–1980. Critics (Jagdish Bhagwati, T.N. Srinivasan, and the 1955 work of B.R. Shenoy who alone dissented from the Plan-Frame) argued that the regime bred rent-seeking, capacity under-utilisation and a captive consumer. Defenders credit it with building an industrial base, scientific institutions and self-reliance from a colonial starting point.

One question, then back to the lesson

Ask about this lesson