---
title: "Attitude, Persuasion & Moral-Political Attitudes"
description: "Grasp how attitudes form and change, the attitude-behaviour gap, persuasion routes, and moral, political and social attitudes as they apply to the civil"
url: "https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/lessons/upsc-ethics-gs4-attitude-persuasion-moral-political-attitudes"
---

[New](https://modeldiplomat.com/)

Attitude, persuasion & moral/political attitudes

Read 1 of 4

1/80 XP so far this lesson

Lesson 18 min 20 XP

# Attitude, persuasion & moral/political attitudes

UPSC GS-4 lesson on attitude structure, attitude-behaviour gap, persuasion routes, and moral/political/social attitudes for the civil services context.

## What an attitude is

Attitude is a learned, relatively enduring evaluative orientation toward an object, person, group, idea or situation. Gordon Allport (1935) defined it as "a mental and neural state of readiness, organized through experience, exerting a directive or dynamic influence upon the individual's response." The UPSC syllabus lists attitude explicitly: its **content, structure and function**.

## The tripartite (ABC) structure

The Rosenberg-Hovland model (Yale, 1960) decomposes every attitude into three components:

- **Affective** — feelings and emotions toward the object ("I am disgusted by corruption").
- **Behavioural / conative** — the disposition to act ("I refuse bribes and report them").
- **Cognitive** — beliefs and knowledge ("Corruption raises transaction costs and erodes trust").

A strong, integrated attitude has all three aligned; **attitudinal ambivalence** arises when components conflict (an officer who believes reservation is just but feels resentment toward beneficiaries).

## The four functions (Daniel Katz, 1960)

Katz's functional theory explains *why* people hold attitudes:

1. **Adjustive / utilitarian** — maximise reward, minimise punishment.
2. **Ego-defensive** — protect self-esteem (prejudice masking insecurity).
3. **Value-expressive** — articulate core values and self-concept (a probity-driven officer).
4. **Knowledge** — organise and simplify a complex world.

Functional matching matters: to change an ego-defensive attitude you address the underlying anxiety, not the facts.

## How attitudes form

Attitudes are **acquired, not innate**, through:

- **Classical conditioning** — pairing an object with affect.
- **Operant conditioning** — reinforcement of expressed views.
- **Observational learning** (Bandura's Bobo doll experiment, 1961) — modelling parents, peers, media.
- **Mere exposure** (Zajonc, 1968) — familiarity breeds liking.
- **Socialisation agents** — family (the primary source), school, peer group, religion, workplace and mass media.

## Moral, political and social attitudes

The syllabus names three specific clusters. A **moral attitude** is an evaluative orientation grounded in conceptions of right and wrong — integrity, justice, compassion. A **political attitude** orients the individual toward authority, ideology, the state and rights — it shapes whether a citizen trusts institutions or a civil servant respects constitutional neutrality (Article 311's protections presuppose a politically neutral service). A **social attitude** orients toward groups and norms; when negative and group-directed it becomes **prejudice**, with discrimination as its behavioural arm. Gordon Allport's *The Nature of Prejudice* (1954) and the **contact hypothesis** — that equal-status, cooperative contact reduces prejudice — are high-yield. For a civil servant, the prescribed attitude is **constitutional**: empathy toward the weaker sections (Articles 38, 46), tolerance, objectivity and probity, codified in the All India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968 and the Civil Services Values articulated by the Second ARC's 4th Report, *Ethics in Governance* (2007).

One question, then back to the lesson

Ask about this lesson