---
title: "US-China Relations and the Indo-Pacific Contest"
description: "Trace US-China relations from normalization to strategic competition and the contest over the Indo-Pacific, framed precisely for the Guokao international"
url: "https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/lessons/china-foreign-policy-us-china-relations-the-indo-pacific"
---

[New](https://modeldiplomat.com/)

US-China relations & the Indo-Pacific

Read 1 of 3

1/70 XP so far this lesson

Lesson 18 min 20 XP

# US-China relations & the Indo-Pacific

Lesson 4 of 8: US-China relations from normalization to strategic competition, and the contest over the Indo-Pacific, framed for the Guokao international section.

## From Normalization to Strategic Competition

US-China relations rest on three foundational instruments that every Guokao candidate must name precisely. First, the **Shanghai Communiqué of 28 February 1972**, issued after President Richard Nixon's visit, in which Washington acknowledged that "all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China." Second, the **Joint Communiqué on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations**, effective **1 January 1979**, by which the United States recognized the People's Republic of China as the sole legal government of China and severed formal ties with Taipei. Third, the **17 August 1982 Communiqué**, in which Washington stated it intended gradually to reduce arms sales to Taiwan. These three documents constitute Beijing's "three joint communiqués," the bedrock of its position.

The United States balances them against the **Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96-8, 10 April 1979)** and the **Six Assurances of 1982**, which together commit Washington to provide Taiwan defensive arms and to maintain the capacity to resist coercion. Beijing rejects the TRA as a violation of the communiqués. This asymmetry—China's "one China principle" versus Washington's "one China policy"—is a high-yield distinction for the exam.

## The Pivot and the Trade War

Engagement defined the era from Deng Xiaoping's 1979 visit through China's **WTO accession on 11 December 2001**. The turn came with the Obama administration's **"Pivot to Asia" (rebalance), announced 2011**, articulated by Secretary Hillary Clinton in *Foreign Policy* ("America's Pacific Century"). The Trump administration's **National Security Strategy of December 2017** formally designated China a "strategic competitor" and "revisionist power," ending the bipartisan engagement consensus. The trade war followed: **Section 301 tariffs** from 2018, the **Phase One trade deal of 15 January 2020**, and export controls targeting Huawei and SMIC.

The Biden administration sustained competition while adding "guardrails," codified in the **CHIPS and Science Act (9 August 2022)** and the **7 October 2022 semiconductor export controls**. The framing crystallized as "invest, align, compete" (Secretary Antony Blinken, May 2022) and "de-risking, not decoupling" (adopted at the 2023 G7 Hiroshima Summit). Flashpoints include the **August 2022 Pelosi visit to Taiwan**, which triggered PLA live-fire exercises encircling the island, and the **February 2023 balloon incident**. The **Woodside summit (Xi-Biden, 15 November 2023)** restored military-to-military communication.

Candidates should retain the conceptual vocabulary: Graham Allison's "Thucydides Trap" (2017), Beijing's framing of a "new type of major-country relations" (proposed by Xi, 2013), and the demand for relations built on "mutual respect, peaceful coexistence, and win-win cooperation."

One question, then back to the lesson

Ask about this lesson