---
title: "Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992): Mandal Case"
description: "Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992) is the Mandal Commission verdict that upheld 27% OBC reservation, set the 50% ceiling, and created the creamy layer rule."
url: "https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/glossary/indra-sawhney-v-union-of-india"
---

[New](https://modeldiplomat.com/)

#

Model Diplomat Research Team · Last reviewed June 22, 2026

TL;DR

- Indra Sawhney v.
- Union of India (1992) is the Supreme Court of India judgment upholding 27% reservation for Other Backward Classes while capping total reservations at 50% and barring the creamy layer.
- What is the 50% reservation ceiling established in Indra Sawhney?
- What is the creamy layer doctrine and whom does it exclude?
- Did Indra Sawhney permit reservation in promotions?

[Civil Service & Diplomatic Exams](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/civil-services/glossary)Updated June 22, 2026

Go beyond the definition

## Research Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992) like a delegate

Model Diplomat's AI drafts position papers, speeches, and country research with real sources — built for MUN and politics students.

## Timeline

1. 13 August 1990

   Singh's government issued an Office Memorandum on reserving 27% of vacancies in central government services and public-sector undertakings for the Other Bac…

2. 16 November 1992

   The 6:3 judgment delivered on remains the single most authoritative pronouncement on reservation in Indian constitutional law.

## Research it like a delegate

Research on modeldiplomat.com

## Ask a follow-up about Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992)

Open a cited briefing in Model Diplomat search — timelines, positions, and sources you can use in committee or exam answers.

[Start research on Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992)](https://modeldiplomat.com/search?q=Explain%20Indra%20Sawhney%20v.%20Union%20of%20India%20\(1992\)%20%E2%80%94%20key%20dates%2C%20actors%2C%20positions%2C%20and%20sources)

Example

In May 2021 the Supreme Court struck down Maharashtra's Maratha reservation in Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil v. Chief Minister, holding that exceeding the 50% ceiling fixed in Indra Sawhney (1992) was impermissible.

Keep learning

## Go deeper than the definition

[Explore all Civil Service & Diplomatic Exams lessons](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/civil-services)[Test yourself with a quiz](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/glossary/quiz/civil-services)

## Take Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992) beyond the glossary

Ask the AI research engine built for diplomacy — get briefings, position papers, and speeches with sources you can cite in committee.
