The first country of asylum concept allows a state to decline examining an asylum claim on the merits if the applicant has already been recognised as a refugee, or otherwise enjoys sufficient protection, in another country to which they can be readmitted. It is one of several "admissibility" tools states use to allocate responsibility for refugee protection, alongside the related but distinct safe third country concept.
The term is most clearly codified in EU law. Article 35 of the recast Asylum Procedures Directive (2013/32/EU) defines a country as a first country of asylum for an applicant if they have been recognised as a refugee there and can still avail themselves of that protection, or otherwise enjoy "sufficient protection," including benefit from the principle of non-refoulement, and will be readmitted. UNHCR has issued guidance cautioning that "sufficient protection" should be effective and accessible in practice, not merely formal.
Key features distinguishing it from related concepts:
- First country of asylum requires that protection has already been granted or is already available to the specific individual.
- Safe third country concerns a state the applicant merely transited or has a connection to, where they could seek protection.
- Both differ from Dublin responsibility-allocation rules among EU member states.
In practice, the concept is invoked when applicants move onward after receiving status elsewhere—for example, recognised refugees in Turkey, Kenya, or Jordan who then travel to Europe. Critics, including UNHCR and NGOs such as ECRE, argue the standard is often applied without sufficient individual assessment of whether protection is genuinely effective, durable, and accessible, particularly where the prior host country lacks full implementation of the 1951 Refugee Convention or imposes geographic limitations (as Turkey does, having ratified the Convention with the geographic reservation limiting it to European refugees).
Misapplication can result in chain refoulement, where an applicant is returned to a country that subsequently returns them to persecution, violating Article 33 of the 1951 Convention.
Example
In the 2010s, several EU member states sought to declare Turkey a first country of asylum for Syrian applicants who had been registered there before travelling onward, a practice central to the March 2016 EU-Turkey Statement.
Frequently asked questions
First country of asylum requires that the applicant has already been granted protection or enjoys sufficient protection there; safe third country applies where the applicant merely could have sought protection in a transit or connected state.
Keep learning