BRICS Bridge: Cross-Border Payment Platform

Model Diplomat Research Team · Last reviewed June 22, 2026

TL;DR

A proposed cross-border payment and settlement platform for BRICS members designed to reduce reliance on the US dollar and Western financial infrastructure.
Is BRICS Bridge operational?
How does it differ from mBridge?
Would BRICS Bridge replace SWIFT?

Updated June 22, 2026

Go beyond the definition

Research BRICS Bridge like a delegate

Model Diplomat's AI drafts position papers, speeches, and country research with real sources — built for MUN and politics students.

Research it like a delegate

Research on modeldiplomat.com

Ask a follow-up about BRICS Bridge

Open a cited briefing in Model Diplomat search — timelines, positions, and sources you can use in committee or exam answers.

Start research on BRICS Bridge

Example

At the October 2024 BRICS summit in Kazan, Russian President Vladimir Putin promoted the BRICS Bridge proposal as a way for member states to settle trade outside the dollar-based SWIFT network.

Keep learning

Go deeper than the definition

Explore all Economics & Trade lessons Test yourself with a quiz

Take BRICS Bridge beyond the glossary

Ask the AI research engine built for diplomacy — get briefings, position papers, and speeches with sources you can cite in committee.

Research it like a delegate

BRICS Bridge (sometimes styled "BRICS Pay" in adjacent proposals) refers to a concept advanced primarily by Russia during its 2024 BRICS chairmanship for a multilateral payment and settlement system linking the central banks and commercial banking systems of BRICS member states. The idea was formally presented in the Russian Finance Ministry and Central Bank report "Improvement of the International Monetary and Financial System," released ahead of the Kazan Summit in October 2024.

The platform's stated goal is to enable cross-border transactions in local currencies and potentially in tokenized central bank assets (a form of wholesale CBDC interoperability), bypassing correspondent banking rails such as SWIFT and reducing exposure to secondary sanctions imposed by the United States and European Union. Conceptually, BRICS Bridge draws on the architecture of the Bank for International Settlements' mBridge project, which has experimented with multi-CBDC settlement among the central banks of China, Hong Kong, Thailand, and the UAE.

Key features under discussion have included:

Tokenized representations of national currencies issued by participating central banks
A shared distributed ledger or messaging layer for settlement instructions
Optional integration with existing national systems like Russia's SPFS, China's CIPS, and India's UPI

At the Kazan Summit, BRICS leaders endorsed continued study of payment infrastructure cooperation but did not formally launch BRICS Bridge. The joint declaration referred to expanding local-currency trade and exploring BRICS Clear (a settlement and depository concept) without committing to a binding timetable. Significant obstacles remain: China and India have shown caution about a project closely associated with sanctioned Russian entities, and the BIS in 2024 stepped back from mBridge amid concerns about sanctions circumvention. As of the Kazan declaration, BRICS Bridge remains a policy proposal under technical study rather than an operational system.

Frequently asked questions

Is BRICS Bridge operational?

No. As of the 2024 Kazan Summit, it remains a proposal under technical study; BRICS leaders endorsed continued cooperation on payments but did not launch the system.

How does it differ from mBridge?

mBridge is a BIS-led multi-CBDC pilot involving China, Hong Kong, Thailand, and the UAE. BRICS Bridge would be governed by BRICS members themselves and explicitly framed around reducing exposure to Western sanctions.

Would BRICS Bridge replace SWIFT?

Not directly. It is designed as an alternative settlement channel for BRICS-area trade rather than a global messaging replacement, and most BRICS banks still rely on SWIFT for non-BRICS transactions.