The phrase "abolished national-origins immigration quotas" refers to the dismantling of the discriminatory framework established by the Emergency Quota Act of 1921 and entrenched by the Immigration Act of 1924 (the Johnson-Reed Act). That earlier regime capped annual immigration from each country at a percentage of the foreign-born population of that nationality recorded in an earlier census—initially 1910, then deliberately rolled back to the 1890 census precisely to suppress arrivals from Southern and Eastern Europe (Italians, Poles, Jews) and to bar nearly all Asians under the "aliens ineligible for citizenship" clause. The abolition was accomplished by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-236), commonly called the Hart-Celler Act after sponsors Senator Philip Hart and Representative Emanuel Celler, signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson at the foot of the Statue of Liberty on 3 October 1965.
Hart-Celler replaced national-origins quotas with a preference system organized around two principles: family reunification and skilled labor. It set a per-country ceiling (eventually 20,000) applied uniformly regardless of national origin, with an annual Eastern Hemisphere cap of 170,000 and, for the first time, a numerical limit on the Western Hemisphere of 120,000. Visas were distributed across preference categories favoring relatives of U.S. citizens and permanent residents, professionals, scientists, artists of exceptional ability, and refugees. Immediate relatives—spouses, minor children, and parents of adult citizens—were exempted from the numerical caps altogether, a feature that drove later "chain migration" patterns. The Act completed a liberalization begun by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter Act), which had removed outright racial bars to naturalization but retained the quota structure.
The demographic consequences were profound and largely unanticipated by legislators, who had predicted little change. Immigration shifted decisively from Europe toward Asia and Latin America: arrivals from Korea, the Philippines, India, China, and Mexico surged in the decades after 1965, reshaping the ethnic composition of the United States. The reform is widely regarded as a product of the Civil Rights era, reflecting the same egalitarian logic as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Subsequent statutes built on this foundation, including the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 and the Immigration Act of 1990, which raised ceilings and added the diversity visa lottery; as of 2026 the preference-and-per-country framework established in 1965 remains the structural basis of U.S. legal immigration.
For the FSOT (Foreign Service Officer Test), this topic appears in the Job Knowledge section under U.S. history, government, and society. Examiners test recognition of the Hart-Celler Act by name and year, its abandonment of the 1924 national-origins formula, its dual emphasis on family reunification and skills, and its place within Great Society and civil-rights legislation. A common question angle contrasts the 1924 quota logic with the 1965 preference system, or asks candidates to identify the law that ended racially weighted immigration. Comparative-government and policy questions may also link it to broader debates on diversity, demography, and American national identity.
Example
President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Hart-Celler Act beneath the Statue of Liberty on 3 October 1965, abolishing the national-origins quotas that since 1924 had favored Northern and Western European immigrants.
Frequently asked questions
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, known as the Hart-Celler Act (Public Law 89-236), signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson on 3 October 1965. It replaced country-based quotas with a preference system.