--- title: "Danish Security Fair 2027 — Fredericia | Model Diplomat" description: "Danish Security Fair 2027 is a professional conference in Fredericia, Denmark, Aug 25–26, 2027. Dates, deadlines, fees, and prep links." url: "https://modeldiplomat.com/conferences/professional/danish-security-fair-2027" --- # Danish Security Fair 2027 Aug 25–26, 2027[Fredericia, Denmark](https://www.google.com/maps/search/?api=1\&query=Fredericia%2C%20Denmark)In-person [Registration open](https://www.danishsecurityfair.dk/en/) The Danish Security Fair 2027 is a significant event hosted in Fredericia, DNK, focusing on the latest innovations and solutions within the security sector. This gathering serves as a crucial platform for professionals to explore new technologies, discuss emerging threats, and foster collaborations aimed at enhancing security measures across various domains. It underscores DNK's commitment to advancing security infrastructure and knowledge. ## Committees & topics - Security Council 1 (UNSC) The Situation in Sudan - Security Council 2 (UNSC) Cybersecurity and the Protection of Critical Infrastructure - Committee on Digital Affairs & Sovereignty Digital Sovereignty, Cross-Border Data Flows and Platform Governance - Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) Sovereign Debt Restructuring in Developing Countries - UNESCO Protection of Cultural Heritage in Armed Conflict and the Ethics of AI in Education - UN Environment Programme (UNEP) Operationalising the Global Plastics Treaty and Closing the Emissions Gap - World Health Organisation (WHO) Implementation of the WHO Pandemic Agreement - Human Rights Council (HRC) Human Rights in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence ## Why it matters This event is critical for understanding the evolving landscape of global security. As threats become more sophisticated, forums like the Danish Security Fair 2027 provide an essential space for knowledge exchange and the development of robust countermeasures. The fair's focus on practical solutions and technological advancements directly contributes to strengthening national and international security frameworks. For policymakers and industry leaders, the fair offers insights into the future direction of security technology and policy. It highlights the importance of proactive strategies in addressing challenges ranging from cyber warfare to physical security breaches. By bringing together diverse stakeholders, the event facilitates a holistic approach to security, emphasizing that effective protection requires continuous innovation and collaboration. The discussions and exhibitions at the fair can influence investment decisions and policy reforms, shaping the security agenda for years to come. ## How to prepare To effectively engage with the Danish Security Fair 2027, participants should conduct thorough preparatory research on current security trends and the specific challenges faced by DNK and its regional partners. Understanding the geopolitical context, particularly concerning cyber threats and critical infrastructure protection, will be crucial. Attendees should also familiarize themselves with the key players in the European security market and DNK's strategic security priorities. Delegates should prepare to articulate their organization's contributions to security innovation and be ready to engage in discussions about cross-border cooperation. Reviewing lessons such as "[Engagement Strategies](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/lessons/engagement-strategies)" and "Dynamic Analysis" can provide valuable frameworks for maximizing participation. Identifying potential partners and areas of mutual interest beforehand will enable more productive networking and collaboration opportunities at the fair. Consider a "Stakeholder Mapping Workshop" to identify key individuals and organizations to connect with. ## Country perspectives Where the most-relevant 4 countries stand on the core issues in play. Click through for the full country profile. [Denmark](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/denmark) [Host and key innovator in security technology.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/denmark) [Role in topic](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/denmark) [As the host nation, DNK plays a central role in organizing and shaping the agenda of the Danish Security Fair 2027. The country is a significant contributor to security innovation, particularly in areas like cybersecurity and critical infrastructure protection, and uses this platform to showcase its advancements and foster international collaboration.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/denmark) [United States](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) [Major developer and exporter of security solutions.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) [Role in topic](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) [The USA is a global leader in security technology and defense. Its participation in the fair would likely involve showcasing cutting-edge solutions in cybersecurity, surveillance, and defense systems, and seeking opportunities for partnerships and market expansion within Europe.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) [United Kingdom](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom) [Strong focus on intelligence and cyber defense.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom) [Role in topic](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom) [The GBR has a robust intelligence and cyber defense sector. Its representatives would likely focus on sharing expertise in threat intelligence, digital forensics, and national security strategies, looking to collaborate on joint research and development initiatives.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom) [Germany](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/germany) [Key player in industrial security and data protection.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/germany) [Role in topic](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/germany) [DEU is a major industrial power with a strong emphasis on data protection and industrial security. Its presence at the fair would likely highlight solutions for protecting critical infrastructure, industrial control systems, and ensuring compliance with stringent data privacy regulations.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/germany) ## Topics & background The background behind each topic and the actors that shape it. 1 Security Council 1 (UNSC) ### The Situation in Sudan Sudan has been engulfed in civil war since April 2023, when long-standing tensions between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) under General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) under Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo ('Hemedti') erupted into open conflict in Khartoum. The fighting was the violent culmination of a power struggle that followed the 2019 ouster of Omar al-Bashir and the 2021 military coup that derailed Sudan's democratic transition. Combat quickly spread to Darfur, Kordofan, and Gezira, with the RSF accused of ethnically targeted atrocities echoing the Darfur genocide of the 2000s. The war has produced the world's largest displacement crisis, with more than ten million people uprooted internally or across borders into Chad, South Sudan, Egypt, and Ethiopia, alongside acute famine conditions declared in parts of Darfur. The Security Council's existing tools — the Resolution 1591 sanctions regime and Darfur arms embargo — have proven difficult to enforce, with credible reporting of external arms flows to the RSF via the UAE and to the SAF via Egypt and Iran. Mediation tracks in Jeddah, Manama, and through IGAD and the African Union have repeatedly stalled. The Council is now wrestling with humanitarian access, the protection of civilians, the prospect of expanded ICC referrals, and whether to broaden the sanctions regime beyond Darfur to cover the whole of Sudan. Russian and Chinese skepticism of coercive measures, alongside divisions among elected members with regional stakes, continues to shape the diplomatic terrain. Key players - [Sudan](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/sudan) [State on whose territory the conflict unfolds; SAF-led government holds the UN seat.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/sudan) - [United States](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) [Penholder on Sudan sanctions and lead in Jeddah mediation track.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) - [United Kingdom](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom) [Penholder on Sudan humanitarian and political files at the Council.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom) - [United Arab Emirates](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-arab-emirates) [Accused by UN experts of supplying the RSF; influential Gulf actor.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-arab-emirates) - [Russia](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/russia) [Sanctions skeptic with commercial and Wagner-linked interests in Sudan.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/russia) - [Egypt](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/egypt) [Neighbour backing the SAF and hosting large refugee populations.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/egypt) 2 Security Council 2 (UNSC) ### Cybersecurity and the Protection of Critical Infrastructure State and state-sponsored cyber operations against critical infrastructure — energy grids, financial systems, hospitals, water utilities, undersea cables, and satellite networks — have moved from peripheral concern to central security issue. Incidents such as NotPetya (2017), Colonial Pipeline (2021), the Viasat KA-SAT attack at the outset of Russia's invasion of Ukraine (2022), and a steady stream of ransomware and wiper campaigns have demonstrated that disruptive cyber effects can cascade across borders and sectors with limited warning and uncertain attribution. The UN normative framework rests on the 2015 GGE report, endorsed by the General Assembly, which set out eleven voluntary norms of responsible state behaviour and confirmed that international law, including the UN Charter, applies in cyberspace. Successor processes — the Open-Ended Working Group (OEWG) on ICT security running through 2025 and parallel GGE work — have broadened participation but not resolved core disputes over how international humanitarian law applies, what counts as a use of force, and whether a new binding treaty is needed. A future Programme of Action is under negotiation as a permanent UN mechanism. In the Security Council itself, cyber has surfaced through Arria-formula meetings and thematic debates rather than binding resolutions. Members differ sharply on whether the Council should treat major cyberattacks on critical infrastructure as threats to international peace and security warranting Chapter VII tools, or whether such questions belong solely in disarmament and technical fora. Key players - [United States](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) [Leading proponent of the 2015 GGE norms framework and Council attention to cyber threats.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) - [Russia](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/russia) [Original sponsor of the OEWG; favours a new binding cyber treaty under UN auspices.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/russia) - [China](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china) [Advocates cyber sovereignty and state-led governance of ICTs.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china) - [United Kingdom](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom) [Active on attribution and IHL applicability in cyberspace.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom) - [France](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/france) [Promoter of the Paris Call for Trust and Security in Cyberspace.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/france) - [Estonia](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/estonia) [Hosts NATO CCDCOE; vocal on critical infrastructure protection norms.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/estonia) 3 Committee on Digital Affairs & Sovereignty ### Digital Sovereignty, Cross-Border Data Flows and Platform Governance The notion of 'digital sovereignty' — the assertion of state authority over data, infrastructure, and online services within national jurisdiction — has moved from a niche European concern to a defining axis of international digital policy. The EU has codified its approach through the GDPR (2018), Digital Services Act, Digital Markets Act, AI Act, and the Data and Data Governance Acts, while pursuing the Gaia-X cloud project. China's Cybersecurity Law (2017), Data Security Law (2021), and Personal Information Protection Law institutionalise a state-centric model with extensive data localisation. India, Brazil, Vietnam, Russia, and a growing number of states have adopted localisation or conditional transfer regimes of their own. These national frameworks coexist uneasily with a global digital economy built on cross-border data flows. The OECD, G7, and Japan's 'Data Free Flow with Trust' initiative seek interoperability, while the WTO e-commerce Joint Statement Initiative has struggled to conclude. The 2024 UN Global Digital Compact, adopted as part of the Pact for the Future, established a soft-law baseline on connectivity, data governance, AI, and digital public goods, but left implementation to subsequent processes including a planned international scientific panel on AI and a global dialogue on AI governance. At the same time, major platforms — Meta, Alphabet, ByteDance, X, Amazon, Microsoft — exercise quasi-regulatory power over speech, commerce, and information ecosystems, raising questions about platform liability, content moderation, algorithmic transparency, and the role of states from the Global South that host users but neither headquarters nor regulators of these companies. Key players - [United States](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) [Home jurisdiction of dominant platforms; champions open data flows with limited regulation.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) - [China](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china) [Operates a sovereign digital ecosystem and exports cyber-sovereignty norms.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china) - [Germany](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/germany) [Leading EU voice on digital sovereignty, Gaia-X, and platform regulation.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/germany) - [France](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/france) [Co-architect of EU digital rulebook and AI Act; hosts AI Action Summit follow-up.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/france) - [India](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/india) [Major digital market shaping DPI exports and a localisation-friendly data regime.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/india) - [Brazil](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/brazil) [Sets influential Global South precedent through LGPD and platform accountability cases.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/brazil) 4 Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) ### Sovereign Debt Restructuring in Developing Countries Developing-country debt distress has reached its highest level in a generation. UNCTAD estimates that more than half of low-income countries are in or at high risk of debt distress, with interest payments now exceeding combined spending on health or education in dozens of states. The pandemic, the post-2022 surge in global interest rates, currency depreciations, and commodity shocks compounded longer-term increases in borrowing from non-Paris Club creditors — notably China — and from private bondholders, which together account for the majority of external debt for many sovereigns. The G20's Debt Service Suspension Initiative (2020–2021) and the Common Framework for Debt Treatments Beyond the DSSI have produced only a small number of restructurings (Chad, Zambia, Ghana, Sri Lanka outside the framework), and have been criticised for delay, opacity, and unequal creditor participation. Zambia's restructuring took more than three years; comparability-of-treatment disputes between official and private creditors remain unresolved. African and Latin American debtors, supported by UNCTAD and a coalition led by states such as Kenya and Colombia, have pushed for a UN-anchored sovereign debt workout mechanism, building on GA Resolution 69/319 and the outcomes of the Fourth Financing for Development Conference (FfD4) in Sevilla in 2025. ECOSOC is the principal UN body where this debate intersects with the SDG financing gap, estimated by UN DESA at over USD 4 trillion per year. Core disputes concern where authority over restructuring should sit (IMF, G20, or UN), how to bring private creditors and Chinese policy banks into common rules, and how to embed climate and development considerations into debt sustainability analyses. Key players - [United States](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) [Largest IMF shareholder; resists UN-led restructuring architecture.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) - [China](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china) [Largest bilateral official creditor to developing countries; central to Common Framework cases.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china) - [Zambia](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/zambia) [Test case for the Common Framework and lead voice for African debtors.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/zambia) - [Kenya](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/kenya) [Co-leads calls at FfD4 for a UN sovereign debt mechanism.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/kenya) - [Germany](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/germany) [Influential Paris Club creditor shaping European position on restructuring.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/germany) - [Brazil](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/brazil) [G20 presidency legacy on debt and taxation; champions Global South reform agenda.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/brazil) 5 UNESCO ### Protection of Cultural Heritage in Armed Conflict and the Ethics of AI in Education UNESCO's mandate over culture, education, and science has been stress-tested by overlapping crises. Armed conflicts in Ukraine, Gaza, Syria, Yemen, Mali, and Sudan have damaged or destroyed hundreds of sites of cultural significance, many under the 1954 Hague Convention and its protocols, and several inscribed on the World Heritage List. UNESCO has documented damage to historic centres, religious sites, museums, and archives, and has activated emergency mechanisms including enhanced protection listings and satellite monitoring with UNOSAT. ICC jurisprudence in Al Mahdi (2016) established that intentional attacks on cultural heritage can constitute war crimes, reinforcing UNESCO's normative role. In parallel, UNESCO's 2021 Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence — adopted by all 193 member states — has become the principal global soft-law instrument on AI ethics, supplemented by the 2023 Guidance on Generative AI in Education and Research. As generative AI is integrated into curricula, assessment, and research, UNESCO is grappling with risks to academic integrity, linguistic diversity, teacher autonomy, and equity between connected and unconnected learners, alongside the 2.6 billion people still offline. The organisation also continues to manage geopolitical strain: the United States rejoined UNESCO in 2023 after a five-year absence, while disputes over the politicisation of heritage listings — particularly in Jerusalem, Hebron, and Crimea — remain live. Key players - [France](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/france) [Host state; lead funder and convenor on heritage and AI ethics.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/france) - [United States](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) [Recently re-joined member; influential on AI governance and funding.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) - [China](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china) [Major contributor; active on heritage listings and AI capacity-building.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china) - [Italy](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/italy) [Leads Blue Helmets for Culture initiative protecting heritage in conflict.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/italy) - [Ukraine](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/ukraine) [Frontline state for heritage protection under the 1954 Hague Convention.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/ukraine) - [United Arab Emirates](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-arab-emirates) [Hosts ALIPH-supported heritage initiatives and AI ministry pioneering policy.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-arab-emirates) 6 UN Environment Programme (UNEP) ### Operationalising the Global Plastics Treaty and Closing the Emissions Gap UNEP sits at the intersection of two of the most consequential environmental negotiations of the decade. Following UNEA Resolution 5/14 in 2022, member states negotiated an Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee process toward a legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment. After five INC rounds — concluding with INC-5 in Busan in late 2024 and a resumed session in 2025 — states remain divided over whether the treaty should cap primary plastic polymer production, regulate chemicals of concern, and create a dedicated financial mechanism, or focus narrowly on downstream waste management. In parallel, UNEP's annual Emissions Gap Report continues to show that current Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement put the world on track for roughly 2.5–2.9°C of warming by 2100, far above the 1.5°C goal reaffirmed at COP28's first Global Stocktake. The 2025 NDC submission cycle and the operationalisation of the Loss and Damage Fund, hosted at the World Bank under UNFCCC and Paris guidance, place new demands on developing-country capacity and on developed-country finance commitments, including the new collective quantified goal agreed at COP29 in Baku. UNEP is also the secretariat host for major MEAs including the Minamata Convention on Mercury, CITES, CMS, and the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions, giving it leverage in linking plastics, chemicals, and climate agendas. Key players - [Kenya](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/kenya) [Host of UNEP HQ and a leading voice for an ambitious plastics treaty.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/kenya) - [Norway](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/norway) [Co-chair of the High Ambition Coalition to End Plastic Pollution.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/norway) - [Saudi Arabia](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/saudi-arabia) [Leading the 'like-minded group' opposing production caps in the plastics treaty.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/saudi-arabia) - [China](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china) [Largest producer of plastics and major emitter; pivotal to any compliance regime.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china) - [United States](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) [Major plastics producer and climate financier; position on production caps closely watched.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) - [Brazil](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/brazil) [COP30 host; bridge between forest, biodiversity, and climate negotiations.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/brazil) 7 World Health Organisation (WHO) ### Implementation of the WHO Pandemic Agreement The COVID-19 pandemic exposed systemic failures in pandemic preparedness, equity of access to medical countermeasures, and the architecture of the International Health Regulations (2005). In response, the World Health Assembly established an Intergovernmental Negotiating Body in 2021 to draft a new convention, agreement, or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. After three years of negotiation, the World Health Assembly adopted the WHO Pandemic Agreement in May 2025 alongside targeted amendments to the IHR, marking the first major treaty negotiated under Article 19 of the WHO Constitution since the FCTC. The Agreement enters its implementation phase with several core obligations still to be operationalised through an annex on Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing (PABS), under continued INB negotiation. Disputes persist over technology transfer terms (voluntary vs. mandatory), allocation of pandemic-related health products, One Health surveillance obligations, and sustainable financing for preparedness — particularly for low- and middle-income countries. The Pandemic Fund hosted at the World Bank remains under-capitalised relative to assessed needs. At the same time, WHO faces budgetary strain following the United States' 2025 notification of withdrawal, ongoing measles and mpox outbreaks, and the broader challenge of integrating non-communicable disease commitments from the 2025 UN High-Level Meeting on NCDs into national health systems. Key players - [Switzerland](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/switzerland) [Host state of WHO and a key voice on equitable access mechanisms.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/switzerland) - [United States](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) [Largest historical donor; announced withdrawal reshapes negotiating dynamics.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) - [China](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china) [Major manufacturer of vaccines and APIs; central to PABS and tech-transfer talks.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china) - [South Africa](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/south-africa) [Leader of the Africa Group and architect of the equity agenda in negotiations.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/south-africa) - [India](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/india) [World's largest vaccine producer; pivotal on IP and technology transfer.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/india) - [Brazil](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/brazil) [Strong proponent of binding equity provisions and One Health approach.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/brazil) 8 Human Rights Council (HRC) ### Human Rights in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence The rapid diffusion of generative AI systems since 2022 has forced human rights bodies to confront a new generation of risks: large-scale disinformation and electoral interference, non-consensual intimate imagery, biased automated decision-making in welfare, migration and policing, surveillance enabled by facial recognition, and harms to labour rights and linguistic minorities. The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights has issued successive reports — including the 2021 and 2024 reports to the Council on the right to privacy in the digital age and on AI — calling for moratoria on the highest-risk applications and for human-rights due diligence by states and companies. The Council operates against a thickening regulatory backdrop: the EU AI Act (2024), the Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI (2024) — the first binding international AI treaty — UNESCO's 2021 Recommendation on the Ethics of AI, the 2024 UN Global Digital Compact, and the GA's 2024 resolution on safe, secure and trustworthy AI led by the United States, alongside a parallel China-led resolution on AI capacity-building. The B-Tech Project at OHCHR continues to operationalise the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights in the tech sector. The Council is now debating whether to establish a Special Rapporteur on the human rights implications of AI, how ICCPR Articles 17 and 19 apply to algorithmic content curation, and how to ensure that human rights — including non-discrimination, due process, and freedom of expression — are embedded in national AI laws and procurement, particularly in jurisdictions with limited technical capacity. Key players - [United States](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) [Lead sponsor of the 2024 GA AI resolution; home to leading AI firms.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) - [China](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china) [Co-sponsor of AI capacity-building resolution; advocates state-led AI governance.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china) - [United Kingdom](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom) [Convenor of the AI Safety Summit series and active HRC member.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom) - [Netherlands](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/netherlands) [Lead state on responsible military AI (REAIM) and human-rights due diligence.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/netherlands) - [Brazil](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/brazil) [Shaping Global South AI regulation through PL 2338 and HRC initiatives.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/brazil) - [South Korea](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/south-korea) [Co-host of REAIM and active on AI safety institute cooperation.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/south-korea) ## Resources News, lessons, and country profiles to prep for Danish Security Fair 2027. Recent reporting to ground your prep [US Job Openings at 6.7M](https://modeldiplomat.com/story/us-job-openings-at-67m-implications-for-2026-elections) [Trump's Economic Reset](https://modeldiplomat.com/story/trumps-economic-reset-aiming-to-tackle-high-gas-prices) [Supreme Court's Voting Rights Impact on 2026](https://modeldiplomat.com/story/supreme-courts-voting-rights-ruling-reshapes-2026-elections) [Mifepristone Ruling Sparks 2026 Political Tug](https://modeldiplomat.com/story/mifepristone-ruling-creates-political-wedge-for-democrats-in-2026) Lessons Bite-sized lessons to build the basics [Hidden Stakeholders](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/lessons/hidden-stakeholders) [Engagement Strategies](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/lessons/engagement-strategies) [Dynamic Analysis](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/lessons/dynamic-analysis) [Stakeholder Mapping Workshop](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/lessons/stakeholder-workshop) Courses Guided courses that go deeper on the topic [Advanced Negotiation](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/courses/advanced-negotiation) [Multilateral Negotiation](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/courses/multilateral-negotiation) [Policy Brief Writing](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/courses/policy-brief) [Conflict Resolution](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/courses/conflict-resolution) The states in play, with the data that shapes their stance [Denmark](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/denmark) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/denmark) [Sudan](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/sudan) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/sudan) [United States](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states) [United Kingdom](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom) [United Arab Emirates](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-arab-emirates) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-arab-emirates) [Russia](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/russia) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/russia) [Egypt](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/egypt) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/egypt) [China](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china) [France](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/france) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/france) [Estonia](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/estonia) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/estonia) [Germany](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/germany) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/germany) [India](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/india) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/india) [Brazil](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/brazil) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/brazil) [Zambia](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/zambia) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/zambia) [Kenya](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/kenya) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/kenya) [Italy](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/italy) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/italy) [Ukraine](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/ukraine) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/ukraine) [Norway](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/norway) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/norway) [Saudi Arabia](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/saudi-arabia) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/saudi-arabia) [Switzerland](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/switzerland) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/switzerland) [South Africa](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/south-africa) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/south-africa) [Netherlands](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/netherlands) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/netherlands) [South Korea](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/south-korea) [Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/south-korea) ## Frequently asked questions - - - Free account Save conferences, research any topic with AI, build position papers, and keep your daily prep streak — free. [Create free account](https://modeldiplomat.com/sign-up?next=%2Fconferences%2Fprofessional%2Fdanish-security-fair-2027) Already a member? [Log in](https://modeldiplomat.com/sign-in?next=%2Fconferences%2Fprofessional%2Fdanish-security-fair-2027) Free account Save conferences, research any topic with AI, build position papers, and keep your daily prep streak — free. [Create free account](https://modeldiplomat.com/sign-up?next=%2Fconferences%2Fprofessional%2Fdanish-security-fair-2027) Already a member? [Log in](https://modeldiplomat.com/sign-in?next=%2Fconferences%2Fprofessional%2Fdanish-security-fair-2027)