---
title: "CyberSecThailand Summit 2026 — Bangkok | Model Diplomat"
description: "CyberSecThailand Summit 2026 is a professional conference in Bangkok, Thailand, Oct 8, 2026. Organized by Cybersecasia. Full prep on Model Diplomat."
url: "https://modeldiplomat.com/conferences/professional/cybersecthailand-summit-2026"
---

# CyberSecThailand Summit 2026

Oct 8, 2026[Bangkok, Thailand](https://www.google.com/maps/search/?api=1\&query=Bangkok%2C%20Thailand)In-person

[Registration open](https://cybersecasia.org/csth2026)

The CyberSecThailand Summit 2026 is a key regional event dedicated to addressing the complex and evolving challenges within the cybersecurity landscape. Hosted in Bangkok, [Thailand](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand), this summit serves as a critical platform for experts, policymakers, and industry leaders to converge and deliberate on strategies for enhancing digital resilience. Its focus encompasses a broad spectrum of cyber threats and the innovative defensive measures required to safeguard digital infrastructure and data. This gathering is particularly significant given Thailand's strategic position in Southeast Asia, a region undergoing rapid digital transformation. The summit aims to foster collaboration and knowledge exchange, contributing to the development of robust cybersecurity frameworks and practices across the region. Participants will engage in discussions designed to shape future policies and technological advancements in cybersecurity.

## Committees & topics

- Topics

  The Global Cybersecurity Landscape · Digital Transformation and Inclusive Governance · Artificial Intelligence in Cybersecurity · Cloud Security and Shared Responsibility · Operational Technology (OT) and Industrial Control System Security · Web Application Security · Building a Cybersecurity Culture · Securing Critical Infrastructure

## Why it matters

The increasing sophistication of cyber threats necessitates continuous dialogue and collaboration among nations and organizations. Events like the CyberSecThailand Summit 2026 are crucial for staying ahead of these threats, which can have far-reaching implications for national security, economic stability, and individual privacy. The discussions held here directly influence the preparedness of governments and industries to counter cyber warfare, espionage, and criminal activities.

Furthermore, the summit's location in Bangkok, [Thailand](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand), highlights the critical role of Southeast Asia in the global digital economy. As countries in this region continue to digitalize, they become more susceptible to cyberattacks, making robust cybersecurity measures indispensable. The insights and partnerships forged at this event are vital for protecting critical infrastructure and ensuring the secure flow of information, which underpins modern societies.

For Model Diplomat, understanding the outcomes and policy recommendations from such summits is essential for analyzing global digital governance and security trends. The event provides a lens through which to examine the interplay between technological advancements, national interests, and international cooperation in the digital domain. It also offers valuable insights into the regional dynamics of cybersecurity, which can inform broader geopolitical analyses.

## How to prepare

To effectively engage with the CyberSecThailand Summit 2026, it is imperative to conduct thorough research into the current cybersecurity postures and challenges faced by countries in Southeast Asia, particularly THA. Understanding their national cybersecurity strategies, key vulnerabilities, and international collaborations will provide a strong foundation for analysis. Consider exploring the concept of "dynamic analysis" to better grasp the evolving nature of cyber threats and defensive tactics.

Delegates should also prepare by identifying key stakeholders likely to be present, including government officials, private sector representatives, and academic experts. Utilizing a "stakeholder mapping workshop" can help in understanding their respective interests and potential influence on policy outcomes. Pay close attention to any "[hidden stakeholders](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/lessons/hidden-stakeholders)" whose perspectives might not be immediately obvious but are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the regional cybersecurity landscape.

Finally, developing a strong grasp of international cybersecurity norms and agreements, such as the "[Digital Geneva Convention proposal](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/glossary/digital-geneva-convention-proposal)", will be beneficial. This context will allow for a more nuanced understanding of the policy discussions and potential areas of consensus or divergence among participants. Consider how different "engagement strategies" might be employed to foster cooperation on complex cybersecurity issues.

## Country perspectives

Where the most-relevant 4 countries stand on the core issues in play. Click through for the full country profile.

[Thailand](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand)

[Thailand is actively working to enhance its national cybersecurity capabilities and frameworks to protect its rapidly expanding digital economy and critical infrastructure.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand)

[Role in topic](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand)

[As the host nation, THA plays a central role in facilitating regional dialogue and cooperation on cybersecurity. It is a key player in developing and implementing national cybersecurity policies, and its experience with digital transformation makes it a relevant case study for other developing economies. The summit provides an opportunity for THA to showcase its progress and seek international partnerships.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand)

[Singapore](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/singapore)

[Singapore is a leader in cybersecurity innovation and policy within Southeast Asia, advocating for international cooperation and robust digital defense mechanisms.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/singapore)

[Role in topic](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/singapore)

[SGP often serves as a benchmark for cybersecurity best practices in the region. Its advanced digital infrastructure and proactive approach to cyber defense mean its representatives will likely share insights on cutting-edge technologies and policy frameworks, influencing regional standards and collaborative initiatives.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/singapore)

[United States](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)

[The United States prioritizes global cybersecurity stability and works with allies to counter state-sponsored and criminal cyber threats, often providing technical assistance and intelligence sharing.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)

[Role in topic](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)

[The USA is a major global actor in cybersecurity, with significant technological capabilities and a vested interest in securing international digital commons. Its participation would likely involve discussions on threat intelligence sharing, capacity building, and promoting international norms of responsible state behavior in cyberspace.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)

[China](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china)

[China is a significant cyber power with a focus on national digital sovereignty and developing its own robust cybersecurity industry and regulatory framework.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china)

[Role in topic](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china)

[CHN's perspective on cybersecurity is shaped by its emphasis on national security and control over its digital space. Its involvement would be crucial for discussions on global cybersecurity governance, particularly concerning data localization, supply chain security, and the role of state actors in cyberspace.](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china)

## Topics & background

The background behind each topic and the actors that shape it.

1

### The Global Cybersecurity Landscape

Cybersecurity emerged as a distinct policy domain in the late 1990s as the commercial internet expanded and incidents such as the Morris Worm (1988) and the Melissa virus (1999) demonstrated systemic vulnerabilities. Through the 2000s and 2010s, state-linked operations — Stuxnet against Iranian centrifuges (2010), the Sony Pictures hack (2014), NotPetya (2017), and the SolarWinds supply-chain compromise (2020) — transformed cybersecurity from a technical IT concern into a matter of national security and international law. The UN Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) and the successor Open-Ended Working Group (OEWG) on ICTs have since attempted, with mixed success, to codify norms of responsible state behavior in cyberspace. The current dispute centers on whether existing international law — particularly the UN Charter, international humanitarian law, and sovereignty principles — adequately governs cyber operations, or whether a binding treaty is needed. Western states generally favor extending existing law and voluntary norms, while Russia, China, and several non-aligned states have pushed for a new convention, including the recently adopted UN Convention against Cybercrime (2024). Ransomware, state-sponsored intrusions, and the targeting of hospitals and electoral systems remain top concerns. Today the field is shaped by rapid AI integration, growing supply-chain risk, and fragmentation along geopolitical lines, with the EU's NIS2 Directive, the US National Cybersecurity Strategy, and ASEAN's cyber cooperation frameworks setting divergent regulatory baselines.

Key players

- [United States](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)

  [Leading offensive and defensive cyber power; anchors Western norms agenda via CISA and NSA](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)
- [China](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china)

  [Major state cyber actor; advocates 'cyber sovereignty' and a treaty-based UN framework](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china)
- [Russia](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/russia)

  [Co-sponsor of the OEWG track and UN Cybercrime Convention; frequently implicated in disruptive operations](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/russia)
- [Israel](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/israel)

  [Global hub for offensive cyber tooling and defensive industry](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/israel)
- [United Kingdom](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom)

  [Co-leads Western cyber diplomacy through NCSC and the Counter Ransomware Initiative](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom)
- [Thailand](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand)

  [Host state advancing ASEAN cyber capacity-building and the 2019 Cybersecurity Act](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand)

2

### Digital Transformation and Inclusive Governance

Digital transformation — the integration of digital technologies across government, industry, and society — accelerated dramatically after 2010 with cloud computing, mobile penetration, and platform economics, and again after 2020 as the COVID-19 pandemic forced rapid digitization of public services. Estonia's e-government model, India's India Stack (Aadhaar, UPI), and Singapore's Smart Nation initiative became reference architectures for Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI), now central to the UN's 2024 Global Digital Compact. The core dispute is over governance and equity: who sets standards, how data flows across borders, and how developing states can adopt DPI without entrenching dependencies on foreign vendors or surveillance regimes. The OECD, ITU, and World Bank promote interoperable open standards, while diverging data-localization rules (in China, the EU under GDPR, India, and Vietnam) complicate cross-border digital trade. Concerns about digital divides, accessibility, and the labor-market effects of automation persist. For Southeast Asia, ASEAN's Digital Economy Framework Agreement (under negotiation since 2023) and Thailand's Thailand 4.0 strategy illustrate the regional push to harmonize digital transformation with cybersecurity, data protection, and AI governance.

Key players

- [Thailand](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand)

  [Pursues Thailand 4.0 and chairs ASEAN digital initiatives during the host period](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand)
- [Singapore](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/singapore)

  [Regional standard-setter via Smart Nation and the ASEAN DEFA negotiations](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/singapore)
- [India](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/india)

  [Exports the India Stack DPI model and leads the G20 DPI agenda](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/india)
- [Estonia](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/estonia)

  [Pioneer of e-government and digital identity frameworks](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/estonia)
- [United States](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)

  [Home to dominant cloud and platform providers shaping global digital markets](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)
- [China](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china)

  [Promotes a state-centric digital model and exports infrastructure via the Digital Silk Road](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china)

3

### Artificial Intelligence in Cybersecurity

AI has been used in cybersecurity since the early 2000s for spam filtering and anomaly detection, but the field was transformed after 2017 with deep learning and again after 2022 with the rise of large language models. Defenders increasingly rely on AI for threat detection, SOC automation, and malware classification, while attackers use generative AI for phishing, deepfake-enabled social engineering, and autonomous vulnerability discovery — a dynamic highlighted by the UK's AI Safety Institute and the US Executive Order 14110 (2023). The central dispute concerns dual-use risk and regulation. The EU AI Act (2024) imposes risk-tiered obligations including on cybersecurity-relevant systems; the US has pursued voluntary commitments and NIST's AI Risk Management Framework; China has issued binding rules on generative AI and algorithmic recommendation. International coordination is fragmented across the Bletchley Process, the Seoul and Paris AI Summits, and the OECD AI Principles. Questions about model security, prompt injection, data poisoning, and the use of AI in offensive cyber operations remain unresolved. For the cybersecurity community, the immediate operational issues are AI-augmented attack tooling, the security of AI supply chains (including model weights and training data), and the governance of agentic systems that take autonomous action on networks.

Key players

- [United States](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)

  [Leads frontier AI development and AI-security policy through NIST, CISA, and AISI](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)
- [China](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china)

  [Major AI power with binding generative-AI rules and state-aligned model developers](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china)
- [United Kingdom](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom)

  [Convened the Bletchley AI Safety Summit and hosts the AI Safety Institute](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom)
- [France](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/france)

  [Host of the 2025 AI Action Summit and proponent of multilateral AI governance](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/france)
- [Israel](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/israel)

  [Significant exporter of AI-driven cybersecurity products](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/israel)
- [Japan](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/japan)

  [Leads the G7 Hiroshima AI Process on responsible AI](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/japan)

4

### Cloud Security and Shared Responsibility

Cloud computing emerged commercially in the mid-2000s with AWS (2006), followed by Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud, and has since become the default infrastructure for enterprise and government workloads. Major incidents — the 2019 Capital One breach exploiting a misconfigured AWS WAF, the 2023 Storm-0558 intrusion into Microsoft cloud email used by US government agencies, and recurring Snowflake-related credential breaches in 2024 — have made clear that cloud security is a shared responsibility between providers and customers, but that the boundary is often poorly understood. The core policy dispute involves concentration risk, sovereignty, and jurisdiction. The US CLOUD Act (2018) and the EU's response through GAIA-X, the EUCS certification scheme, and data-localization rules reflect a transatlantic struggle over law-enforcement access and provider control. China's Cybersecurity Law, Data Security Law, and PIPL impose strict localization, while ASEAN states including Thailand and Indonesia have introduced their own data-protection regimes. CISA's 2024 review of the Microsoft Exchange Online intrusion sharply criticized cloud-provider security culture. Current debates focus on confidential computing, identity and access management at scale, supply-chain attestation, and how sovereign-cloud arrangements can coexist with global interoperability.

Key players

- [United States](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)

  [Home to the three largest hyperscalers and the CLOUD Act jurisdictional regime](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)
- [Germany](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/germany)

  [Drives EU sovereign-cloud efforts including GAIA-X and shapes EUCS](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/germany)
- [France](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/france)

  [Champion of the SecNumCloud high-assurance standard and EU cloud sovereignty](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/france)
- [China](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china)

  [Operates a parallel cloud ecosystem under strict data-localization laws](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china)
- [Singapore](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/singapore)

  [Regional cloud hub setting MAS and IMDA cloud-security baselines](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/singapore)
- [Thailand](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand)

  [Implements PDPA-aligned cloud guidance through ETDA and the NCSA](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand)

5

### Operational Technology (OT) and Industrial Control System Security

Operational technology — the industrial control systems (ICS), SCADA, and PLCs running power grids, water utilities, factories, and transport — was historically air-gapped and security-by-obscurity. The 2010 Stuxnet operation against Iran's Natanz facility demonstrated that OT was a viable target for state actors. Subsequent incidents — BlackEnergy and Industroyer against Ukraine's grid (2015, 2016), Triton/Trisis targeting safety instrumented systems in Saudi Arabia (2017), Colonial Pipeline (2021), and continuing GRU-linked attacks on Ukrainian and allied utilities — have made OT a central concern of national cyber strategies. The core dispute is how to secure long-lived industrial assets that were never designed for internet connectivity, in a context of IT/OT convergence, ransomware exposure, and geopolitical targeting. Standards such as IEC 62443, NIST SP 800-82, and the EU's NIS2 and CER directives are converging on baseline requirements, while CISA, ENISA, and Japan's METI publish sector-specific guidance. Vendor concentration (Siemens, Rockwell, Schneider Electric, ABB) creates systemic supply-chain risk. Today the priority issues are network segmentation, secure remote access, vulnerability disclosure for ICS, and protecting safety systems from both criminal and state-aligned actors.

Key players

- [United States](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)

  [Leads OT defense doctrine via CISA, the EPA, and sector risk-management agencies](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)
- [Germany](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/germany)

  [Home to Siemens and a major ICS-standards contributor through BSI](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/germany)
- [Ukraine](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/ukraine)

  [Frontline case study for OT defense under sustained state-grade attack](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/ukraine)
- [Israel](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/israel)

  [Hub for OT-security vendors and national INCD coordination](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/israel)
- [Japan](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/japan)

  [Drives OT resilience for manufacturing through METI and IPA guidance](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/japan)
- [Thailand](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand)

  [Securing OT in energy, water, and manufacturing under the 2019 Cybersecurity Act](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand)

6

### Web Application Security

Web application security became a discrete discipline in the early 2000s with the founding of OWASP (2001) and the publication of its Top 10 list, which codified risks such as injection, broken authentication, and cross-site scripting. As web applications became the primary interface for banking, government services, and e-commerce, breaches such as Heartbleed (2014), Equifax via Apache Struts (2017), Magecart skimming campaigns, and the Log4Shell vulnerability (2021) demonstrated how a single web-stack flaw can cascade across the global economy. The contemporary landscape is shaped by the shift to API-first architectures, single-page applications, and serverless backends, which have expanded the attack surface beyond classic web flaws to include broken object-level authorization, SSRF, and supply-chain risks in JavaScript dependencies. Regulators are catching up: PCI DSS 4.0 imposes new client-side security requirements, the EU Cyber Resilience Act (2024) extends obligations to software products, and OWASP has published dedicated API Security and LLM Top 10 lists. Key debates concern secure-by-design mandates, software bills of materials (SBOMs), liability for insecure software, and how bug-bounty and coordinated vulnerability disclosure regimes should be harmonized internationally.

Key players

- [United States](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)

  [Drives secure-by-design policy via CISA and hosts the largest web-platform vendors](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)
- [United Kingdom](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom)

  [NCSC issues influential web and API security guidance](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom)
- [Germany](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/germany)

  [BSI shapes EU Cyber Resilience Act implementation for web software](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/germany)
- [Singapore](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/singapore)

  [CSA Singapore promotes the Safe App Standard for mobile and web apps](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/singapore)
- [India](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/india)

  [Major exporter of web-development services and CERT-In disclosure regime](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/india)
- [Thailand](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand)

  [Implements PDPA and ETDA secure-application guidance for digital services](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand)

7

### Building a Cybersecurity Culture

The recognition that 'people' are as critical as 'process' and 'technology' dates to early information-security models, but the modern emphasis on cybersecurity culture grew out of the realization in the 2010s that the overwhelming majority of breaches — Verizon's annual DBIR consistently reports above 70% — involve a human element such as phishing, misdelivery, or credential reuse. ENISA, NIST (notably SP 800-50 and the NICE Workforce Framework), and the UK NCSC have published successive guidance reframing security awareness as ongoing behavioral and organizational change rather than one-off training. The central challenge is workforce: ISC2 estimates a global cybersecurity workforce gap of roughly four million people, with acute shortages in the Asia-Pacific. States and firms differ on whether to prioritize formal credentialing (CISSP, CompTIA, regional schemes), university pipelines, or apprenticeship and reskilling. Cultural questions — psychological safety for reporting incidents, just-culture approaches to human error, and inclusion of women and underrepresented groups — are increasingly seen as security-relevant. Today the discussion centers on measurable security behaviors, executive accountability (reinforced by SEC cyber-disclosure rules and NIS2 management liability), and integrating cybersecurity into broader digital literacy programs in schools and SMEs.

Key players

- [United Kingdom](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom)

  [NCSC pioneers behavioral and cultural approaches to security awareness](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom)
- [United States](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)

  [Sets workforce frameworks via NIST NICE and SEC accountability rules](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)
- [Singapore](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/singapore)

  [CSA's SG Cyber Safe and workforce strategies are regional benchmarks](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/singapore)
- [Australia](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/australia)

  [ASD and the Cyber Security Strategy emphasize culture and skills uplift](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/australia)
- [Estonia](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/estonia)

  [Integrates cyber hygiene into national digital-literacy education](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/estonia)
- [Thailand](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand)

  [NCSA and ETDA drive national cyber-awareness and workforce development](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand)

8

### Securing Critical Infrastructure

Critical infrastructure protection became a formal policy domain after the US Marsh Commission report (1997) and PDD-63 (1998), which identified sectors — energy, water, finance, telecoms, healthcare, transport — whose disruption would cause cascading societal harm. Subsequent incidents reshaped the field: the Ukraine grid attacks (2015, 2016), WannaCry's impact on the UK NHS (2017), NotPetya's global spillover (2017), Colonial Pipeline (2021), the Viasat KA-SAT hack at the start of Russia's invasion of Ukraine (2022), and ongoing 'Volt Typhoon' intrusions into US infrastructure attributed to China (disclosed 2023–2024). The core dispute is normative and operational. Diplomatically, states agreed at the UN GGE and OEWG that critical infrastructure should be off-limits in peacetime, yet pre-positioning and disruptive operations continue. Domestically, governments are tightening regulation: the EU's NIS2 and CER Directives, the US National Cybersecurity Strategy and TSA pipeline directives, Japan's Economic Security Promotion Act, and Thailand's designation of Critical Information Infrastructure under the 2019 Cybersecurity Act all impose stronger obligations. Public-private information sharing, supply-chain risk (including vendors such as Huawei and Kaspersky), and resilience of space and undersea-cable assets are recurring themes. The debate today is how to translate norms into deterrence and accountability, how to defend converged IT/OT environments, and how to ensure that smaller states and operators can meet rising baseline expectations.

Key players

- [United States](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)

  [Coordinates CI defense through CISA and sector risk-management agencies](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)
- [China](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china)

  [Subject of Western attribution for CI pre-positioning operations](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china)
- [Russia](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/russia)

  [Associated with disruptive CI operations including against Ukraine](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/russia)
- [Ukraine](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/ukraine)

  [Real-world testbed for CI resilience under sustained attack](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/ukraine)
- [Japan](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/japan)

  [Implements CI security under the Economic Security Promotion Act](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/japan)
- [Thailand](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand)

  [Host state implementing the CII regime under the 2019 Cybersecurity Act](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand)

## Resources

News, lessons, and country profiles to prep for CyberSecThailand Summit 2026.

Recent reporting to ground your prep

[Arming an archipelago: Is time running out for Europe's oldest DMZ? | Euronews](https://modeldiplomat.com/story/ala-arming-an-archipelago-is-time-running-out-for-europes-oldest-dmz-euronews)

[Comprehensive approach to security: Federal Council launches consultation on Switzerland's security policy strategy](https://modeldiplomat.com/story/che-comprehensive-approach-to-security-federal-council-launches-consultation-on)

[Europe's June Heatwave: Infrastructure Crisis](https://modeldiplomat.com/story/europes-june-heatwave-infrastructure-crisis)

[Ukraine Drone Strikes Crimea Power Grid](https://modeldiplomat.com/story/ukraine-drone-strikes-crimea-power-grid)

Lessons

Bite-sized lessons to build the basics

[Hidden Stakeholders](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/lessons/hidden-stakeholders)

[Engagement Strategies](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/lessons/engagement-strategies)

[Dynamic Analysis](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/lessons/dynamic-analysis)

[Stakeholder Mapping Workshop](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/lessons/stakeholder-workshop)

Courses

Guided courses that go deeper on the topic

[Cross-Cultural Communication](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/courses/cross-cultural)

[Advanced Negotiation](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/courses/advanced-negotiation)

[Multilateral Negotiation](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/courses/multilateral-negotiation)

[Policy Brief Writing](https://modeldiplomat.com/learn/courses/policy-brief)

The states in play, with the data that shapes their stance

[Thailand](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand)

[Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/thailand)

[United States](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)

[Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-states)

[China](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china)

[Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/china)

[Russia](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/russia)

[Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/russia)

[Israel](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/israel)

[Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/israel)

[United Kingdom](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom)

[Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/united-kingdom)

[Singapore](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/singapore)

[Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/singapore)

[India](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/india)

[Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/india)

[Estonia](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/estonia)

[Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/estonia)

[France](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/france)

[Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/france)

[Japan](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/japan)

[Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/japan)

[Germany](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/germany)

[Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/germany)

[Ukraine](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/ukraine)

[Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/ukraine)

[Australia](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/australia)

[Country dossier](https://modeldiplomat.com/country/australia)

## Frequently asked questions

-
-
-

Free account

Save conferences, research any topic with AI, build position papers, and keep your daily prep streak — free.

[Create free account](https://modeldiplomat.com/sign-up?next=%2Fconferences%2Fprofessional%2Fcybersecthailand-summit-2026)

Already a member? [Log in](https://modeldiplomat.com/sign-in?next=%2Fconferences%2Fprofessional%2Fcybersecthailand-summit-2026)

Free account

Save conferences, research any topic with AI, build position papers, and keep your daily prep streak — free.

[Create free account](https://modeldiplomat.com/sign-up?next=%2Fconferences%2Fprofessional%2Fcybersecthailand-summit-2026)

Already a member? [Log in](https://modeldiplomat.com/sign-in?next=%2Fconferences%2Fprofessional%2Fcybersecthailand-summit-2026)
